GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Paul Markham - There is nothing wrong with the tube model.

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Paul Markham - There is nothing wrong with the tube model. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1055754)

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18749977)

Wasn't my argument at all you senile old coot. :1orglaugh

Paul Markham - There is nothing wrong with the tube model. Seems it was.

So prove there's nothing wrong with giving away so much free porn the need to buy is reduced. If I have to prove the obvious, then it's a waste of time.

Those cheesy sets were selling for $3,000 in 1990 to 2007 that's why I can sit here and laugh at you. Who sold you site to sell traffic, because free porn meant more porn sales. :upsidedow :1orglaugh

So everyone should rush out, turn their sites into free tubes and see their income grow. :1orglaugh

Prove it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18750868)

You are absolutely a certified idiot. Nobody gives a shit that you can sell decades worth of work for $3000 a pop to people throwing up cookie cutter sites when getting credit cards by lying was easy business. I sold my basic services for $5000 a pop from 2001 to 2007 so I'm not even impressed, laugh away.

I sold nothing to sell traffic you donkey. I opened an offline business that I ran for three years and still own to this day. Free porn is irrelevant, there is nothing wrong with the tube model as said in my very first fucking post. There isn't, you not liking it won't change that.

There is nothing wrong with the tube model.

Cheers Paul.

So who placed an order pretending to be Paul? :1orglaugh

paul markham

no traffic

no sales

and unsellable shit 80's content

good stuff paul

8am here I will grab an iced coffee and see how much money I made in my sleep

you have a cup of tea and ponder how pathetic your situation is :1orglaugh

Note to self.

Don't argue with failures. They have to hang on to what's left.

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 18748996)

It's going to be a funny day when Paul realizes tubes are the same as magazines.

Both rely on selling subscriptions and advertising to survive.

Just quoting the post Paul skipped over because he realizes it's true... :2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18751932)

He's trying to con newbies he's a playa and making money.

Proof or ban.

Love how you screenshot something that is clearly linked in my signature btw.

Idiot. :thumbsup

Paul, those blurry 160x120 webcam images look better than any content you've ever shot. How does that feel? :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18751932)

He's trying to con newbies he's a playa and making money. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Proof or ban Mr Markham. As you like to say to everyone else. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18751977)

Paul, those blurry 160x120 webcam images look better than any content you've ever shot. How does that feel? :1orglaugh

They made a lot more money than your little tool ever will. :1orglaugh

If GFY banned everyone who slung insults at each others businesses this would be a ghost town. Get with the program dude.

There is nothing wrong with the tube model. :1orglaugh

Which is why st pushes chaturbate tools. :upsidedow

http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1232138861.jpg

Now kindly :321GFY

And join my loser (ignore) list. you're not even worth debating with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18752023)

Bye again. :upsidedow

The process of wanking has changed. You used to turn the page and pull your pud then came the VHS and CD -- now you could pull your pud continually unless you wanted to freeze frame to a still with your remote. (Something else to distract your hand.) New computer science advanced wanking into this millennium -- the digitalized wank-o-rama but the mouse was the distraction to the "task at hand."

Where webcams has succeeded is that with cam 2 cam you can wank with a live girl (or person) in a "computer hands free state" flash your cock and get some appreciation from you wanking "partner" -- videos and magazines can not respond to you. Webcams is a rich man's sport. The poor wank for free at the tubes but on pay day they are "rich" and some can afford spending $30 on a cam site -- the persons spending that $30 saw the cam site on the tube when they were temporarily poor wanking to video content. Some "pay day spenders" will buy exclusive interesting video niche content but run-of-the-mill stuff can be had for free today ...

Now, some "traditional" cam sites sales are threatened by the tipping in free-chat to show business model some are using. However, a lot of high-end models and big time spenders want no part of that business model. Still, we will adapt to the market some to continue to be profitable because;

?It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.? ... Charles Darwin

^^ This continues to evidence itself as truth ...

Redundancy, Branding and Direct Type-ins -- this is the value in the poor converting tube traffic. Notwithstanding the copyright infringing "user uploads" that have created this traffic -- the traffic is cheap and accomplishes the above goals. The Affiliate role is to refer the quality traffic that converts so that they too can make their share of the profits.

I don't see anybody who is making real money defending giving it all away for free.

maybe they are too busy making real money to post in a pissing thread on gfy?