ant-porn ideas might blow in Michele Bachmann's face

[victoriavain]

Michele Bachmann has pledged to end internet porn. If free porn is gone then paid accounts will increase making porn makers wealthy enough to control politicians. Using Libertarian principles, it is easy to understand how social engineering will blow up in your face... no pun intended.

[blackmonsters]

Ah hah!

You have the Reader's Digest keyboard.

[TheSquealer]

This all makes perfect sense.





Unless your i.q. is over 35. Then its full of holes.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

This all makes perfect sense.

Unless your i.q. is over 35. Then its full of holes.

My IQ is 135 so I am just fine. If all you can do is throw insults maybe you are the one who is intellectually compromised.

[porno jew]

i think you are on to something. feel free to join my mensa group on facebook.

[blackmonsters]

I'm almost there.

Still working on the part where internet porn is killed but we still have pay sites on
the internet.

[SASCH]

There is something off with that lady just sayin'

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

My IQ is 135 so I am just fine. If all you can do is throw insults maybe you are the one who is intellectually compromised.

"end internet porn"

does not mean

"i want to end tube sites"

or

"i'm going after tgp's"

or

"i really want to see porn subscriptions thrive"

Furthermore, the US is not the internet and there is no possible way to regulate any of this.

Any tard who's been following her rants understands that she means all porn. Not just the porn you don't like because it hurts your other porn sites.


Its not your fault 135. Your complete and total inability to reason through a simple logical problem to a successful conclusion is the fault of the presence of estrogen in your body. You cant do much about it. The good news is that menopause will eventually help. The bad news is that your pussy will dry up and you'll be a bitch.

[BestXXXPorn]

never mind... lol

[bronco67]

I think you inadvertently made a porn reference with your thread title.

Michelle Bachman is pretty fucking stupid. Who does she think will be voting that thing through? The US government is full of men. 100% of men like porn.

The math is right there.

[victoriavain]

As we all know the crack down is meant to put porn behind paid memberships. Another Idea is to force Porn onto a .xxx so the .xxx can be blocked by persona, local or any block geographical location including a whole country.

Squealer, I didn't know I had to spell it out. I thought I was talking to a highly porn educated group.

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

"end internet porn"

does not mean

"i want to end tube sites"

or

"i'm going after tgp's"

or

"i really want to see porn subscriptions thrive"

Furthermore, the US is not the internet and there is no possible way to regulate any of this.

Any tard who's been following her rants understands that she means all porn. Not just the porn you don't like because it hurts your other porn sites.


Its not your fault 135. Your complete and total inability to reason through a simple logical problem to a successful conclusion is the fault of the presence of estrogen in your body. You cant do much about it. The good news is that menopause will eventually help. The bad news is that your pussy will dry up and you'll be a bitch.

[victoriavain]

Yes, I added a hook for a good debate. There is one disgusting creep talking about menopause and dried pussy. He is the type that doesn't like women in control of their own porn sites and think they are livestock to be degraded.

Originally Posted by bronco67

I think you inadvertently made a porn reference with your thread title.

Michelle Bachman is pretty fucking stupid. Who does she think will be voting that thing through? The US government is full of men. 100% of men like porn.

The math is right there.

I put the degrading shit back on ignore.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

As we all know the crack down is meant to put porn behind paid memberships.

You just made that up. Her stance is not "Porn is totally OK, as long as its being sold and people are getting rich off of it"

She wants to wipe porn off the internet. That's been her stated goal to appease the simple minded bible thumpers and get their vote. Just being against abortion these days is too passe' apparently

Another Idea is to force Porn onto a .xxx so the .xxx can be blocked by persona, local or any block geographical location including a whole country.

Her idea? You just made that up as well. Besides, obviously impossible to do, impossible to enforce. The USA is not the internet. It can't happen. It won't happen. I'd lecture you on International IP law, the fact that you can't put 100+ tld's from 100+ countries on a single domain and so on, but i'd bore myself and you wouldnt be able to keep up anyway.

Squealer, I didn't know I had to spell it out. I thought I was talking to a highly porn educated group.

Sure 135, you went to "go fuck yourself.com" and thought you were among educated people. Almost everyone is here precisely because they aren't educated.


135? Really?

[L-Pink]

Originally Posted by porno jew

i think you are on to something. feel free to join my mensa group on facebook.

[raymor]

Cda, cda ii, coppa, all if the major anti-porn laws have been about "protecting children", "keeping porn away from kids". Look at all of those (unconstitutional) porn bans during the Clinton years. They all created more problems for freely available porn than for content protected from access by kids (and people without credit cards).

The OP certainly does have a point. It's not like we don't know what a porn ban looks like. Clinton tried it three times and three times got overturned by the supreme court. It's always been based on the theory that you can't have it out there for just anyone to get, that access must be limited to adult members.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by raymor

Cda, cda ii, coppa, all if the major anti-porn laws have been about "protecting children", "keeping porn away from kids". Look at all of those (unconstitutional) porn bans during the Clinton years. They all created more problems for freely available porn than for content protected from access by kids (and people without credit cards).

The OP certainly does have a point. It's not like we don't know what a porn ban looks like. Clinton tried it three times and three times got overturned by the supreme court. It's always been based on the theory that you can't have it out there for just anyone to get, that access must be limited to adult members.

Thanks for the intelligent sounding contribution. I was starting to think only monkeys throwing shit was going to reply. That is why I left this site a long time ago. So much many degrading people allowed to hijack threads.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

There is one disgusting creep talking about menopause and dried pussy. He is the type that doesn't like women in control of their own porn sites and think they are livestock to be degraded.



I put the degrading shit back on ignore.

Well, I actually can't think of many other natural things that would cripple porn more than
menopause and dried pussy.

So this was on topic.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Well, I actually can't think of many other natural things that would cripple porn more than
menopause and dried pussy.

So this was on topic.

Hey, there is a market for GILF porn. Stop being a GILF playah hatah.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

Hey, there is a market for GILF porn. Stop being a GILF playah hatah.

Hey, I think most people get what you are saying but only in a "karma sense".

Meaning that what you want to happen is too big to focus on; but the principle will
still play out as karma when she loses elections to people who watch porn.

[BFT3K]

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

Yes, I added a hook for a good debate. There is one disgusting creep talking about menopause and dried pussy. He is the type that doesn't like women in control of their own porn sites and think they are livestock to be degraded.

Women in porn ARE continually degraded. You can buy them and trade them and get them to do almost anything you want for a price. What do you call shooting a DP scene? A bukakke shoot? A woman getting gangbanged?... Elevating women and their status in the world?

I have a lot of respect for anyone that can run a successful business. I don't have a great deal of respect for a 19 year old that can suck a cock on camera as if its a unique talent that deserves applause and recognition or as if no one else can do it or has done it. All it takes is a camera, a dick and a mouth.

Ones own denial of the reality does not change the reality.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Hey, I think most people get what you are saying but only in a "karma sense".

Meaning that what you want to happen is too big to focus on; but the principle will
still play out as karma when she loses elections to people who watch porn.

Yes, kind of like that but I am actually refering to human action and how it plays out. People will change their habits and modify their lifestyle to "Follow the cheese."

When one group is regulated out of business another group will jump at an opportunity to make money.

Example: Americans are regulated out of a market and Indians will just provide a service.

[victoriavain]

I can see that cock sucker is still commenting on my thread. Please blow your prostate snot on another location.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Women in porn ARE continually degraded. You can buy them and trade them and get them to do almost anything you want for a price. What do you call shooting a DP scene? A bukakke shoot? A woman getting gangbanged?... Elevating women and their status in the world?

I have a lot of respect for anyone that can run a successful business. I don't have a great deal of respect for a 19 year old that can suck a cock on camera as if its a unique talent that deserves applause and recognition or as if no one else can do it or has done it. All it takes is a camera, a dick and a mouth.

Ones own denial of the reality does not change the reality.

Another reality is that you are putting down porn just as much as any right-wing
zealot.


This thread is starting to read like a fishing trip by a Bachmann rep looking for
debate points.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Another reality is that you are putting down porn just as much as any right-wing
zealot.

This thread is starting to read like a fishing trip by a Bachmann rep looking for
debate points.

You are correct. Left wing people are just as much as a threat to liberty as Right wingers.

There is nothing wrong with a 19 year old that realized she can make money using her assets and markets it. She will have to learn entertainment and how to market herself. I wish her luck and lots of money!

also, since I read what he said from your quote I would like to add that Sucking a cock for a camera takes motivation and skill if you want to make a profit from it.

My husband and I are swingers and I have an adult domain monetization company as a second income. Now and then we run into people like Squealer. Best to just ignore them.

[porno jew]

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

This thread is starting to read like a fishing trip by a Bachmann rep looking for
debate points.

Who are you calling a Bauchmann Rep? I'm a Libertarian. Not a Bauchmann fan at all.

Legalize Drugs
Open Borders
End the Wars

--> Mind you own fucking business

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by porno jew

Nice ass on the chick ant.

[helterskelter808]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Besides, obviously impossible to do, impossible to enforce. The USA is not the internet. It can't happen. It won't happen. I'd lecture you on International IP law, the fact that you can't put 100+ tld's from 100+ countries on a single domain and so on, but i'd bore myself and you wouldnt be able to keep up anyway

The USA might not be the internet but it's home to most pornography online and it's the most powerful and influential country in the world. So, the fact that this will never ever happen notwithstanding...

• Out of those 100+ countries most can be written off immediately since they either prohibit pornography themselves or have no useful internet infrastructure.
  
• Nobody in the world would be able to host outside of .XXX on a US server.
  
• Nobody based in the US would be able to host outside of .XXX on any server.
  
• The US would probably pressure 'weaker' nations to bring in similar laws to put porn behind .XXX, just like countries around the world upped the minimum age for porn performers from 16 to 18 in the last decade or so.
  
• The US could employ methods to block foreign sites that do not conform to .XXX, ban Americans from signing up to non-XXX sites abroad and/or ban American companies from providing billing solutions to non-XXX sites abroad, thus encouraging foreign sites to go .XXX rather than lose a huge market.
  
• Etc.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by victoriavain

Who are you calling a Bauchmann Rep? I'm a Libertarian. Not a Bauchmann fan at all.

Legalize Drugs
Open Borders
End the Wars

--> Mind you own fucking business

By posting this thread, you made it everybody's business.

[victoriavain]

Question Authority! <--- Why the fuck should I?

LOL

But seriously, this does need to be brought to light and people need to know what they are dealing with.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

By posting this thread, you made it everybody's business.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

The USA might not be the internet but it's home to most pornography online and it's the most powerful and influential country in the world. So, the fact that this will never ever happen notwithstanding...

• Out of those 100+ countries most can be written off immediately since they either prohibit pornography themselves or have no useful internet infrastructure.
  
• Nobody in the world would be able to host outside of .XXX on a US server.
  
• Nobody based in the US would be able to host outside of .XXX on any server.
  
• The US would probably pressure 'weaker' nations to bring in similar laws to put porn behind .XXX, just like countries around the world upped the minimum age for porn performers from 16 to 18 in the last decade or so.
  
• The US could employ methods to block foreign sites that do not conform to .XXX, ban Americans from signing up to non-XXX sites abroad and/or ban American companies from providing billing solutions to non-XXX sites abroad, thus encouraging foreign sites to go .XXX rather than lose a huge market.
  
• Etc.

We can't control our AAA credit rating but somehow the internet will bow to
our demands.

OK.

[victoriavain]

Oh yeah, lots of damage could be done. Look at China.

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

The USA might not be the internet but it's home to most pornography online and it's the most powerful and influential country in the world. So, the fact that this will never ever happen notwithstanding...

• Out of those 100+ countries most can be written off immediately since they either prohibit pornography themselves or have no useful internet infrastructure.
  
• Nobody in the world would be able to host outside of .XXX on a US server.
  
• Nobody based in the US would be able to host outside of .XXX on any server.
  
• The US would probably pressure 'weaker' nations to bring in similar laws to put porn behind .XXX, just like countries around the world upped the minimum age for porn performers from 16 to 18 in the last decade or so.
  
• The US could employ methods to block foreign sites that do not conform to .XXX, ban Americans from signing up to non-XXX sites abroad and/or ban American companies from providing billing solutions to non-XXX sites abroad, thus encouraging foreign sites to go .XXX rather than lose a huge market.
  
• Etc.

[victoriavain]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

We can't control our AAA credit rating but somehow the internet will bow to
our demands.

OK.

Right, Govt. can not create prosperity. They can censor and do a very good job at it.

They will pass a bill called "Net Neutrality" or do it in the name of "Emergency prepardness"

They will fucking hack their own site and then pass a law to prevent it just to have a reason to sensor.

[TheSquealer]

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Another reality is that you are putting down porn just as much as any right-wing zealot.

Putting down porn? By what? By saying it takes no talent or skill for a 19 year old to suck a cock and less talent to film it?? I thought that was self evident. Not sure how you compare skill and talent of sucking cock to the morality of filming it and making it available for all to see.

I actually don't care what bible thumpers do or don't do. They exercise their rights under the constitution in terms of pushing for change they believe in. People in this business never will. Even the FSC is a total joke who has no idea what they stand for or what their purpose is, but that knows for sure they need your money. At one point they were going to fight piracy on your behalf. Yay. Of course they wanted to keep the name because that sounds better when asking for donations.

Ultimately porn in the US will be killed. Religious nuts are richer and more motivated and more organized. They are fighting for something they believe in. I don't plan on changing that, no do I plan on stepping into the breach in front of a bunch of disorganized, anti social idiots. Instead, i'll just quietly do my thing and fade into the background when the shit hits the fan. I spent years preparing for that moment.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Bachmann = a classic lose lose proposition ...

[LiveDose]

Ants fucking. Now that's sexy.

[blackmonsters]

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Putting down porn? By what? By saying it takes no talent or skill for a 19 year old to suck a cock and less talent to film it?? I thought that was self evident. Not sure how you compare skill and talent of sucking cock to the morality of filming it and making it available for all to see.

I actually don't care what bible thumpers do or don't do. They exercise their rights under the constitution in terms of pushing for change they believe in. People in this business never will. Even the FSC is a total joke who has no idea what they stand for or what their purpose is, but that knows for sure they need your money. At one point they were going to fight piracy on your behalf. Yay. Of course they wanted to keep the name because that sounds better when asking for donations.

Ultimately porn in the US will be killed. Religious nuts are richer and more motivated and more organized. They are fighting for something they believe in. I don't plan on changing that, no do I plan on stepping into the breach in front of a bunch of disorganized, anti social idiots. Instead, i'll just quietly do my thing and fade into the background when the shit hits the fan. I spent years preparing for that moment.

If you think sucking dick does not involve talent then you either only had one chick
blow you in life or you don't like blowjobs very much.



Go out and get a really shitty blowjob and wise up.




I hear your actual point though.
And that point would be that a lot of producers shoot piss poor garbage with piss poor
performers and people still buy it.

But then again they are the ones complaining about conversions.

Basically you are saying that it takes no talent to act; I've heard that one a
millions times.........always from people who can't act worth a shit.
They don't know what's involved and that's why they are no good themselves and
think it requires no talent. They think they are acting and know they have no talent;
but the flaw in the logic is that only they think they are acting.
Everybody else sees clearly that they, pardon the pun, SUCK!

[Paul Markham]

Originally Posted by raymor

Cda, cda ii, coppa, all if the major anti-porn laws have been about "protecting children", "keeping porn away from kids". Look at all of those (unconstitutional) porn bans during the Clinton years. They all created more problems for freely available porn than for content protected from access by kids (and people without credit cards).

The OP certainly does have a point. It's not like we don't know what a porn ban looks like. Clinton tried it three times and three times got overturned by the supreme court. It's always been based on the theory that you can't have it out there for just anyone to get, that access must be limited to adult members.

The same mistake is being made all the time by the easily scared. Ray thanks for the only sensible reply. The children can keep blabbing.

The mistake is to take seriously what a campaigning politician says to a crowd. If she doesn't know it's impossible she shouldn't be standing for the job of President.

If it were possible to take porn off the Internet is would be the biggest boost to the porn industry ever. Millions who are hooked to porn and get it for free will have to start buying or rely on what they downloaded already. It's not possible so another dream.

Banning free porn. So Pornhub charge $1 for a lifetime membership. If you can't or won't pay. They're better off without you.

The rest of the blah blah is just that. Blah blah.