Man who SFPD shot DID have gun... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Just Alex · 07-21-2011, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I guess if they shot the guy at close range, in the hand, there could be some powder burn.

Right, and it absolutely impossible to differentiate if he was the one holding the gun or just jogging near by. I personally can't believe that this young outstanding citizen would even carry a gun. Its a police cuspiracy, my brava !!!

Just Alex · 07-21-2011, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

correct depends on how close they were. im sure some security cameras have the full story.

But wait. Security cameras have low resolution and we would want you to get confused if he was running and holding a gun or a pack of lollipops for poor under privileged children.

brassmonkey · 07-21-2011, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex

But wait. Security cameras have low resolution and we would want you to get confused if he was running and holding a gun or a pack of lollipops for poor under privileged children.

_Richard_ · 07-21-2011, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex

But wait. Security cameras have low resolution and we would want you to get confused if he was running and holding a gun or a pack of lollipops for poor under privileged children.

that's an interesting point.. i have seen a few instances where rendering has done some crazy things to video

crockett · 07-21-2011, 12:46 PM

Quote:

He was on parole in Washington State after serving part of a 22-month sentence for attempting to promote the prostitution of a 14-year-old girl, and was in violation of his parole by being in San Francisco, according to police.

Reason enough to shoot him right there TBFH.

blackmonsters · 07-21-2011, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

That may rank as the dumbest thing I have read all month.

Then you obviously don't read your own post.

Simply put : The cops that shot him have residue on their hands and they could
contaminate his hands by touching him.

Get a grip.

I'm not saying the guy didn't shoot, I'm just saying that the test is not 100%
when the shooters have touched the guy after shooting him 5 times.

blackmonsters · 07-21-2011, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Alex

Right, and it absolutely impossible to differentiate if he was the one holding the gun or just jogging near by. I personally can't believe that this young outstanding citizen would even carry a gun. Its a police cuspiracy, my brava !!!

http://www.startribune.com/local/eas...&prepage=2&c=y

Quote:

Originally Posted by startribune

Presence of gunshot residue on victim's hand doesn't prove suicide, a retired FBI forensic scientist testifies.

In other words, the victim was shot by someone else but still had gunshot residue on
her hand as if she shot herself.

dillonaire · 07-21-2011, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

there's witnesses on the other side saying he was running with his hands in the air. how is a damn audio prove anything? anyway if he didnt live the wrong way maybe he would be alive. they didnt secure the scene because there was a ton of gangsters in their face and they were scare.

You dont know this neighborhood. Its a bad neighborhood and that guy should be shot for just being in that neighborhood because chances are if you are in that neighborhood and you are not the cops you are doing something wrong.

Just Alex · 07-21-2011, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

http://www.startribune.com/local/eas...&prepage=2&c=y

In other words, the victim was shot by someone else but still had gunshot residue on
her hand as if she shot herself.

Quote:

Ramsey County Medical Examiner Michael B. McGee could not determine with any degree of medical certainty whether Barbara (Bobbi) Winn's death on May 8, 1981, was an accident, a suicide or a homicide.

1981? How about Billy the Kid back in 1881?

Fuck off dude.