Does Gravity Exist?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ilnjscb
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2009
    • 8972

    #51
    The strength of gravity is directly proportional to the amount of mass of each object. The gravitational force increases as the size of an object increases. On the other hand, the strength of gravity is inversely related to the square of the distance between two objects.

    Clearly has a relationship to mass. It also has a relationship to time, gravitational time dilation. We can't really define time, either, though we label it the 4th dimension. If gravity affects mass and space, effectively the third dimension, and time, effectively our way to perceive the 4th dimension, then it is clearly at least represented in 2 dimensions.

    Comment

    • MFCT
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2015
      • 1489

      #52
      Another way to look at gravity:

      Imagine space is a liquid. Imagine atomic & sub-atomic particles as drain holes, in which the liquid of infinite space is constantly flowing into forever. The constant draining action creates micro-vortices, but in the 4th dimension (spherical). The higher number of "drain holes" in a given area = higher gravity.

      A comparison of this effect to something you're already familiar with: let's say you're at the bottom of a pool and the drain opens up. You're now drawn to the drain. If you get close enough to the drain, you're stuck to it. Hence, gravity. Astonishingly simple, when viewed in this way.
      Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed.
      Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

      Comment

      • Cyber Fucker
        Hmm
        • Sep 2005
        • 12642

        #53

        Comment

        • CaptainHowdy
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2004
          • 94732

          #54
          Originally posted by Cyber Fucker
          . . .

          Comment

          • 2MuchMark
            Mark of 2Much.net
            • Aug 2004
            • 50977

            #55
            If you turn a bathroom scale upside down and stand on it, the measurement on the dial will be equal to the force of gravity your body exerts on the earth. Mind=blown?

            Comment

            • Smack dat
              So Fucking Banned
              • Jul 2016
              • 4613

              #56
              Originally posted by 2MuchMark
              If you turn a bathroom scale upside down and stand on it, the measurement on the dial will be equal to the force of gravity your body exerts on the earth. Mind=blown?
              Tried. Couldn't see readout. Mind= Not Blown

              Comment

              • ilnjscb
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2009
                • 8972

                #57
                Originally posted by Smack dat
                Tried. Couldn't see readout. Mind= Not Blown
                Because it won't

                Comment

                • Idigmygirls
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 498

                  #58
                  Are there any actual physicists on this board?

                  I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

                  I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

                  I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

                  For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

                  My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

                  By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

                  Here is the simple math:

                  Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

                  g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

                  New equation:

                  g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

                  I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

                  This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

                  I'll post when my first paper has been published!
                  Red Light Center - Adult Metaverse
                  https://www.redlightcenter.com

                  Comment

                  • MFCT
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2015
                    • 1489

                    #59
                    Idigmygirls, awesome work. Looking forward to that animation and do let us know about the publication. Plz take your theory to the next level by inventing an anti-gravity device. If you can identify exactly what gravity is down to that level of precision, then you can amplify it, nullify it, or otherwise use it to your advantage. Potentially free energy if you could, for example, put 2000 pounds of gravity on one side of a wheel and negative 2000 pounds on the other.
                    Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed.
                    Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

                    Comment

                    • 2MuchMark
                      Mark of 2Much.net
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 50977

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Idigmygirls
                      Are there any actual physicists on this board?

                      I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

                      I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).!
                      Tell me more, but skip the math because I won't understand it.

                      How is Gravity and Electromagnetism the same? Gravity is the force that acts between any 2 objects with mass. Electromagnetic force is the interaction between charges. Also, gravity can only attract but electromagnetic force can repel as well as attract. So how do you arrive at the idea that they are the same?

                      Comment

                      • jsmih
                        Confirmed User
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 334

                        #61
                        They actually now have observatories measuring gravity waves. These were used to detect colliding black holes 1.8 billion light years away. Pretty cool stuff

                        https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20170927

                        Comment

                        • CaptainHowdy
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 94732

                          #62
                          Originally posted by Idigmygirls
                          Are there any actual physicists on this board?

                          I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

                          I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

                          I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

                          For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

                          My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

                          By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

                          Here is the simple math:

                          Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

                          g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

                          New equation:

                          g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

                          I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

                          This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

                          I'll post when my first paper has been published!

                          Comment

                          • 2MuchMark
                            Mark of 2Much.net
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 50977

                            #63
                            Originally posted by jsmih
                            They actually now have observatories measuring gravity waves. These were used to detect colliding black holes 1.8 billion light years away. Pretty cool stuff

                            https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20170927
                            Super-cool. I read about this a couple of months ago. This and CERN LHC are 2 places I would love to visit one day.

                            Comment

                            • ilnjscb
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 8972

                              #64
                              Originally posted by Idigmygirls
                              Are there any actual physicists on this board?

                              I posted a paper a few years ago in which I postulated what was essentially a theory of quantum gravity.

                              I've now worked out all of the math, and my first in a series of actual scientific papers is shortly going to be published in a reputable scientific journal. Subsequent papers will show how my new mathematical framework (which I call Geometric Relativistic Transformations, or GRTs) prove that gravity and electromagnetism are actually the same force (actually, both are curved spacetime that can be described by a single force equation).

                              I'm starting to look for a good animator to produce a video that will explain my entire theory of quantum gravity from start to finish for those that are not inclined to read dense science and math of a journal paper.

                              For those who are interested, I can give you this part of the equation that should blow your mind for real

                              My technique generated a new equation for the Lorentz Factor (the number that tells us how spacetime gets warped by objects in relative motion).

                              By comparing my equation to the traditional equation (of Einstein fame in special relativity), the solution to unification of forces becomes obvious. You see, in the traditional equation, there is a division by zero at the speed of light. By substitution of terms with my new equation, we can get rid of that problem.

                              Here is the simple math:

                              Lorentz factor traditional equation is (where "g" is the lorentz factor):

                              g = 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) that is 1 over the square root of 1-(velocity squared/speed of light squared)

                              New equation:

                              g = sec(arsin(B)) where B is the relative velocity. sec = secant and asin = arcsine

                              I have proven that 1/(root: (1-v^2/c^2)) = g = sec(arsin(B))

                              This simple equation solves the problems with unification of relativity and quantum mechanics. Obviously I'm super excited

                              I'll post when my first paper has been published!
                              I would say it would be pretty miraculous if you could solve quantum gravity with trigonometry, which you appear to have tried. Since measurements indicate no granularity, I would think you'd need a derivative, at least and probably a double derivative.

                              Comment

                              Working...