Is Dot XXX Using Alts to make ICM's Case? - GoFuckYourself.com

Redrob · 12-17-2011, 09:20 PM

According to Amanda36C,

Quote:

Dot XXX later decided to pose as a random guest with the name “D Man” (I know this because the ip # of both “Dot XXX” and “D Man” are exactly the same). They, under this “D Man” alias, went on to cleverly defend ICM at every turn, being certain to add, at least once per posting, a slight comment to distance themself, so as not to seem too supportive of Dot XXX. They added: “not sure I support .XXX…”, then they got back on the same path of defending its policies, their TOS and presenting little-known facts that not everyone would know, such as information about ICM’s Founder’s Program. This was just a day after Dot XXX posted, under the exact same ip.

Link to Blog Post

anexsia · 12-17-2011, 10:17 PM

"The fact that they can’t figure out how to use a proxy to hide their IP address when they are trying to be sneaky seems to be a pretty clear indication that they do not know enough about how the web works to actually successfully enforce any of their so-called “best practices” policies." lol.

looky_lou · 12-17-2011, 11:49 PM

Interesting read. No .xxx for me.

epitome · 12-17-2011, 11:53 PM

I do not support .XXX but,

Why would ICM do such a thing?

They have been nothing but transparent through this entire process. They sought our approval before even going after the ICANN for approval. They represent us. They formed IFFOR to help the adult industry and are giving $10 of every domain to...well, who knows.

They want to help us by giving us billing. They want to advertise to the world that pornographers are fine people that support bestiality (or whatever their latest commercial hints at).

I could go on and on with a Markham Wall of Text™ but I don't need to. Everybody knows that ICM is only here to support the industry and is not here to rape us. They've even made their domains affordable and they are competitively priced.

I bet detractors are using fake nicks to build up opposition. Who are you, "redrob?"

baddog · 12-17-2011, 11:59 PM

So, DotXXX here is Lawley?

Redrob · 12-18-2011, 12:02 AM

Just another pornographer.....nobody, really.

However. being poor, I can't afford an alt.

2intense · 12-18-2011, 12:23 AM

just fuck .xxx

JFK · 12-18-2011, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

So, DotXXX here is Lawley?

That would be interesting

CurrentlySober · 12-18-2011, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

I can't afford an alt.

i cant afford an 'a' - let alone and 'alt'...

cherrylula · 12-18-2011, 05:55 AM

oh the drama... lol

edit:

just read this page: http://amanda36c.wordpress.com/2011/...gistry-dotxxx/

and I think I just lost a few IQ points.... (helpme) lol

cherrylula · 12-18-2011, 06:06 AM

Really people... lol... before you spout off on this issue, GO READ the actual drama. I see Amanda is paranoid as a performer, understandable, but this battle over TOS is almost funny. It almost looks like they posted on an alt name to dumb it down for her. lol srsly

part of what the alt poster posted:

Quote:

Once again the TOS on their website doesn’t apply to domains registered under .XXX – why would you even think that it would? ICM is in the business of selling domain names what would they possibly want with Amanda or anyone elses content? ICANN would never allow that either so if you’re going to talk facts — have some instead of making ridiculous claims like ICM will use your content to build their own websites.

um, lol, yeah.

MrCain · 12-18-2011, 06:25 AM

This does not surprise me at all. Go to twitter and search for @dotxxx and #dotxxx. Almost all positive tweets and retweets are coming from bot accounts and people that sell retweets on fiverr.

Redrob · 12-18-2011, 10:18 AM

Using alts has always been the tool of trolls, holders of secrets, manipulators of opinion and troublemakers in general.

Hence, on GFY rule #11:

Quote:

One username allowed. Fake usernames will be immediately banned. If it is determined that a user has circumvented the banned user terms laid out below and re-registered with a second username to access the board. The user will have the original banned username deleted!

If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.

baddog · 12-18-2011, 10:27 AM

The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

Redrob · 12-19-2011, 06:53 AM

I'd have to agree with you Baddog.

candyflip · 12-19-2011, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

Didn't they hire someone at some point from the board to do just this? Something about it a long standing member as well?

That would make sense as to why they're trying their best to hide their identity.

Just one theory. But then again, that could have all been smoke and mirrors too.

pornguy · 12-19-2011, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

They are following the Obama laws of transparency.

Caligari · 12-19-2011, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.

And a good opinion at that, one which should set off alarm bells in people's heads.

.

Operator · 12-19-2011, 09:23 AM

baddog's from where it all began

Redrob · 12-19-2011, 07:08 PM

Gee, DotXXX was on GFY today and didn't answer my questions.......

Maybe, I'm on ignore....nice.

BlackCrayon · 12-19-2011, 07:28 PM

i always figured the dot xxx guy on here was vaughn.

Redrob · 12-19-2011, 07:38 PM

That would explain a lot.....

Chris · 12-19-2011, 08:01 PM

ive always wondered who dotxxx was

the person who took the job most def does not want to be known for a reason

Achmed · 12-19-2011, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

Using alts has always been the tool of trolls, holders of secrets, manipulators of opinion and troublemakers in general.

Hence, on GFY rule #11:

If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.

I can make a think of 4 guy here that make these names.

Got to go, lady of the nights waiting for me.

Redrob · 12-19-2011, 09:18 PM

As-Salamu Alaykum.

12-17-2011, 11:49 PM	#3
looky_lou Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,771	Interesting read. No .xxx for me. __________________ PUSSY - PUSSY - PUSSY! Wet & Puffy - Wet & Pissy - We Like To Suck Puffy Cash

12-18-2011, 12:02 AM	#6
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	Just another pornographer.....nobody, really. However. being poor, I can't afford an alt. Last edited by Redrob; 12-18-2011 at 12:07 AM..

12-18-2011, 12:23 AM	#7
2intense Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Google Posts: 12,461	just fuck .xxx __________________ Most Affordable Firewall & Malware Protection for Linux Servers

12-18-2011, 05:55 AM	#10
cherrylula lol Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 15,969	oh the drama... lol edit: just read this page: http://amanda36c.wordpress.com/2011/...gistry-dotxxx/ and I think I just lost a few IQ points.... (helpme) lol Last edited by cherrylula; 12-18-2011 at 06:01 AM..

12-18-2011, 06:25 AM	#12
MrCain Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 3,332	This does not surprise me at all. Go to twitter and search for @dotxxx and #dotxxx. Almost all positive tweets and retweets are coming from bot accounts and people that sell retweets on fiverr. __________________ Sigmund

12-17-2011, 10:17 PM	#2
anexsia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 5,735	"The fact that they can’t figure out how to use a proxy to hide their IP address when they are trying to be sneaky seems to be a pretty clear indication that they do not know enough about how the web works to actually successfully enforce any of their so-called “best practices” policies." lol.

12-17-2011, 11:53 PM	#4
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	I do not support .XXX but, Why would ICM do such a thing? They have been nothing but transparent through this entire process. They sought our approval before even going after the ICANN for approval. They represent us. They formed IFFOR to help the adult industry and are giving $10 of every domain to...well, who knows. They want to help us by giving us billing. They want to advertise to the world that pornographers are fine people that support bestiality (or whatever their latest commercial hints at). I could go on and on with a Markham Wall of Text™ but I don't need to. Everybody knows that ICM is only here to support the industry and is not here to rape us. They've even made their domains affordable and they are competitively priced. I bet detractors are using fake nicks to build up opposition. Who are you, "redrob?"

12-17-2011, 11:59 PM	#5
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	So, DotXXX here is Lawley?

12-18-2011, 10:27 AM	#14
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

12-19-2011, 06:53 AM	#15
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	I'd have to agree with you Baddog.

12-19-2011, 09:23 AM	#19
Operator So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Location: ΠπΠ Posts: 2,419	baddog's from where it all began

12-19-2011, 07:08 PM	#20
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	Gee, DotXXX was on GFY today and didn't answer my questions....... Maybe, I'm on ignore....nice.

12-19-2011, 07:28 PM	#21
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	i always figured the dot xxx guy on here was vaughn. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

12-19-2011, 07:38 PM	#22
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	That would explain a lot.....

12-19-2011, 08:01 PM	#23
Chris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: icq: 71462500 Skype: Jupzchris Posts: 27,880	ive always wondered who dotxxx was the person who took the job most def does not want to be known for a reason __________________ [email protected]

12-19-2011, 09:18 PM	#25
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,790	As-Salamu Alaykum.