GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is Dot XXX Using Alts to make ICM's Case? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1050300)

Redrob 12-17-2011 09:20 PM

Is Dot XXX Using Alts to make ICM's Case?
 
According to Amanda36C,
Quote:

Dot XXX later decided to pose as a random guest with the name “D Man” (I know this because the ip # of both “Dot XXX” and “D Man” are exactly the same). They, under this “D Man” alias, went on to cleverly defend ICM at every turn, being certain to add, at least once per posting, a slight comment to distance themself, so as not to seem too supportive of Dot XXX. They added: “not sure I support .XXX…”, then they got back on the same path of defending its policies, their TOS and presenting little-known facts that not everyone would know, such as information about ICM’s Founder’s Program. This was just a day after Dot XXX posted, under the exact same ip.
Link to Blog Post

anexsia 12-17-2011 10:17 PM

"The fact that they can’t figure out how to use a proxy to hide their IP address when they are trying to be sneaky seems to be a pretty clear indication that they do not know enough about how the web works to actually successfully enforce any of their so-called “best practices” policies." lol.

looky_lou 12-17-2011 11:49 PM

Interesting read. No .xxx for me.

epitome 12-17-2011 11:53 PM

I do not support .XXX but,

Why would ICM do such a thing?

They have been nothing but transparent through this entire process. They sought our approval before even going after the ICANN for approval. They represent us. They formed IFFOR to help the adult industry and are giving $10 of every domain to...well, who knows.

They want to help us by giving us billing. They want to advertise to the world that pornographers are fine people that support bestiality (or whatever their latest commercial hints at).

I could go on and on with a Markham Wall of Text™ but I don't need to. Everybody knows that ICM is only here to support the industry and is not here to rape us. They've even made their domains affordable and they are competitively priced.

I bet detractors are using fake nicks to build up opposition. Who are you, "redrob?"

baddog 12-17-2011 11:59 PM

So, DotXXX here is Lawley?

Redrob 12-18-2011 12:02 AM

Just another pornographer.....nobody, really.

However. being poor, I can't afford an alt.

2intense 12-18-2011 12:23 AM

just fuck .xxx

JFK 12-18-2011 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18637397)
So, DotXXX here is Lawley?

That would be interesting:2 cents:

CurrentlySober 12-18-2011 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob (Post 18637401)
I can't afford an alt.

i cant afford an 'a' - let alone and 'alt'... :(

cherrylula 12-18-2011 05:55 AM

oh the drama... lol

edit:

just read this page: http://amanda36c.wordpress.com/2011/...gistry-dotxxx/

and I think I just lost a few IQ points.... (helpme) lol

cherrylula 12-18-2011 06:06 AM

Really people... lol... before you spout off on this issue, GO READ the actual drama. I see Amanda is paranoid as a performer, understandable, but this battle over TOS is almost funny. It almost looks like they posted on an alt name to dumb it down for her. lol srsly

part of what the alt poster posted:

Quote:

Once again the TOS on their website doesn’t apply to domains registered under .XXX – why would you even think that it would? ICM is in the business of selling domain names what would they possibly want with Amanda or anyone elses content? ICANN would never allow that either so if you’re going to talk facts — have some instead of making ridiculous claims like ICM will use your content to build their own websites.
um, lol, yeah.

MrCain 12-18-2011 06:25 AM

This does not surprise me at all. Go to twitter and search for @dotxxx and #dotxxx. Almost all positive tweets and retweets are coming from bot accounts and people that sell retweets on fiverr.

Redrob 12-18-2011 10:18 AM

Using alts has always been the tool of trolls, holders of secrets, manipulators of opinion and troublemakers in general.:2 cents:

Hence, on GFY rule #11:

Quote:

One username allowed. Fake usernames will be immediately banned. If it is determined that a user has circumvented the banned user terms laid out below and re-registered with a second username to access the board. The user will have the original banned username deleted!
If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.

baddog 12-18-2011 10:27 AM

The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

Redrob 12-19-2011 06:53 AM

I'd have to agree with you Baddog.

candyflip 12-19-2011 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18638029)
The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

Didn't they hire someone at some point from the board to do just this? Something about it a long standing member as well?

That would make sense as to why they're trying their best to hide their identity.

Just one theory. But then again, that could have all been smoke and mirrors too.

pornguy 12-19-2011 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18638029)
The fact that DOTXXX on this board feels it is so important to hide their identity makes it difficult for me to believe anything they say. Try being transparent.

They are following the Obama laws of transparency.

Caligari 12-19-2011 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob (Post 18638015)
If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.

And a good opinion at that, one which should set off alarm bells in people's heads.

.

Operator 12-19-2011 09:23 AM

baddog's from where it all began

Redrob 12-19-2011 07:08 PM

Gee, DotXXX was on GFY today and didn't answer my questions.......

Maybe, I'm on ignore....nice.

BlackCrayon 12-19-2011 07:28 PM

i always figured the dot xxx guy on here was vaughn.

Redrob 12-19-2011 07:38 PM

That would explain a lot.....

Chris 12-19-2011 08:01 PM

ive always wondered who dotxxx was

the person who took the job most def does not want to be known for a reason

Achmed 12-19-2011 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob (Post 18638015)
Using alts has always been the tool of trolls, holders of secrets, manipulators of opinion and troublemakers in general.:2 cents:

Hence, on GFY rule #11:



If ICM is asking us to trust them, why do they need alts?

To me, using alts speaks volumes about the ethics and motives of the individuals involved.

Media manipulation to gain acceptance is a tool of repressive organizations and controlling governments; not, people that want us to trust them to do the right thing.

Trust is something that when lost is difficult to recover.

Just my opionion.


I can make a think of 4 guy here that make these names.

Got to go, lady of the nights waiting for me.

Redrob 12-19-2011 09:18 PM

As-Salamu Alaykum.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123