You All Got Taken For A Ride!: Internet Explorer/Intelligence Study A HOAX!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SallyRand
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jan 2008
    • 3487

    #1

    You All Got Taken For A Ride!: Internet Explorer/Intelligence Study A HOAX!

    Yeppers, you all got taken for a ride right here:

    http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1032667

    so head'em up and move'em out!

    You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make you mad!:


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14370878

    "BBC News Technology
    3 August 2011 Last updated at 07:04 ET
    Internet Explorer story was bogus

    A story which suggested that users of Internet Explorer have a lower IQ than people who chose other browsers appears to have been an elaborate hoax.

    A number of media organisations, including the BBC, reported on the research, put out by Canadian firm ApTiquant.

    It later emerged that the company's website was only recently set up and staff images were copied from a legitimate business in Paris.

    It is unclear who was behind the stunt.

    The story was reported by many high profile organisations including CNN, the Daily Mail, the Telegraph and Forbes.

    Questions about the authenticity of the story were raised by readers of the BBC website who established that the company which put out the research - ApTiquant - appeared to have only set up its website in the past month.

    Thumbnail images of the firm's staff on the website also matched those on the site of French research company Central Test, although many of the names had been changed.

    The BBC contacted Central Test who confirmed that they had been made aware of the copy but had no knowledge of ApTiquant or its activities.
    Research claims

    ApTiquant issued a press release claiming that it had invited 100,000 web users to take IQ tests and matched their results with the type of browser they used.

    It also supplied extensive research data.

    The results claimed to show that Internet Explorer users were generally of lower intelligence.

    The BBC sought alternative views for the original story, including Professor David Spiegelhalter of Cambridge University's Statistical Laboratory, who said: "I believe these figures are implausibly low - and an insult to IE users."

    No-one on ApTiquant's contact number was available for comment.

    Graham Cluley, senior security consultant at Sophos examined the source material for the BBC after concerns were raised.

    "It's obviously very easy to create a bogus site like this - as all phishers know it's easy to rip-off someone else's webpages and pictures," he said.

    Mr Cluley also looked at the pdf file containing the data that many people had downloaded from a variety of sources and said it did not appear to contain malware."





    Last edited by SallyRand; 08-03-2011, 04:03 AM.
  • seeandsee
    Check SIG!
    • Mar 2006
    • 50945

    #2
    who cares, but i think anybody using IE older than new one dont know better
    BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

    Contact here

    Comment

    • Emil
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2007
      • 5655

      #3
      If they did a study on this I bet they would get the same result.
      Free 🅑🅘🅣🅒🅞🅘🅝🅢 Every Hour (Yes, really. Free ₿itCoins.)
      (Signup with ONLY your Email and Password. You can also refer people and get even more.)

      Comment

      • seXXXhub
        Confirmed User
        • May 2011
        • 628

        #4
        i bet BBC is using IE ))

        Comment

        • wehateporn
          Promoting Debate on GFY
          • Apr 2007
          • 27176

          #5
          Originally posted by Emil
          If they did a study on this I bet they would get the same result.

          Comment

          • Agent 488
            Registered User
            • Feb 2006
            • 22511

            #6
            we all know you use IE gramps.

            Comment

            • PR_Glen
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2006
              • 9058

              #7
              gotta use it for testing for sure ;)
              webmaster at pimproll dot com

              Comment

              • u-Bob
                there's no $$$ in porn
                • Jul 2005
                • 33063

                #8
                Originally posted by Emil
                If they did a study on this I bet they would get the same result.

                Comment

                • Barry-xlovecam
                  It's 42
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 18083

                  #9

                  Comment

                  • TheDoc
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 13827

                    #10
                    You must be an ie user, only an ie user would be stupid enough to make a entire new thread for all of 5 people.
                    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                    It's all disambiguation

                    Comment

                    • TorchWood
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 45

                      #11
                      This is why teletext will always rule, it makes me feel like a genius every time :D

                      icq: 641315070


                      icq: 641942104

                      Comment

                      • CyberHustler
                        Masterbaiter
                        • Feb 2006
                        • 28771

                        #12
                        Originally posted by SallyRand
                        Yeppers, you all got taken for a ride right here:

                        http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1032667

                        so head'em up and move'em out!

                        You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make you mad!:


                        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14370878

                        "BBC News Technology
                        3 August 2011 Last updated at 07:04 ET
                        Internet Explorer story was bogus

                        A story which suggested that users of Internet Explorer have a lower IQ than people who chose other browsers appears to have been an elaborate hoax.

                        A number of media organisations, including the BBC, reported on the research, put out by Canadian firm ApTiquant.

                        It later emerged that the company's website was only recently set up and staff images were copied from a legitimate business in Paris.

                        It is unclear who was behind the stunt.

                        The story was reported by many high profile organisations including CNN, the Daily Mail, the Telegraph and Forbes.

                        Questions about the authenticity of the story were raised by readers of the BBC website who established that the company which put out the research - ApTiquant - appeared to have only set up its website in the past month.

                        Thumbnail images of the firm's staff on the website also matched those on the site of French research company Central Test, although many of the names had been changed.

                        The BBC contacted Central Test who confirmed that they had been made aware of the copy but had no knowledge of ApTiquant or its activities.
                        Research claims

                        ApTiquant issued a press release claiming that it had invited 100,000 web users to take IQ tests and matched their results with the type of browser they used.

                        It also supplied extensive research data.

                        The results claimed to show that Internet Explorer users were generally of lower intelligence.

                        The BBC sought alternative views for the original story, including Professor David Spiegelhalter of Cambridge University's Statistical Laboratory, who said: "I believe these figures are implausibly low - and an insult to IE users."

                        No-one on ApTiquant's contact number was available for comment.

                        Graham Cluley, senior security consultant at Sophos examined the source material for the BBC after concerns were raised.

                        "It's obviously very easy to create a bogus site like this - as all phishers know it's easy to rip-off someone else's webpages and pictures," he said.

                        Mr Cluley also looked at the pdf file containing the data that many people had downloaded from a variety of sources and said it did not appear to contain malware."





                        Yeah, but you're still a man who acts like a woman...
                        “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

                        Comment

                        • Juicy D. Links
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Apr 2001
                          • 122992

                          #13


                          hehheheh

                          Comment

                          • 96ukssob
                            So Fucking Banananananas
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 12991

                            #14


                            you mad cause you use IE? ha! your stupid
                            Email: Clicky on Me

                            Comment

                            • beerptrol
                              Confirmed Asshole
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 12722

                              #15
                              I'm waiting for them to come out with a study of the IQ of those who pretend to be a woman on an adult webmaster board
                              “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
                              -- Ulysses S. Grant

                              Comment

                              • potter
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2004
                                • 6559

                                #16
                                hoax or not it was still pretty accurate

                                Comment

                                • L-Pink
                                  working on my tan
                                  • Mar 2005
                                  • 39151

                                  #17


                                  .

                                  Comment

                                  Working...