U.S. walks out on truth at U.N.
 

U.S. walks out on truth at U.N. - Sep 2010
U.S.: Ahmadinejad 'delusional' for citing those who believe U.S. was behind attacks

http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/MSNBC/C...p.grid-8x2.jpg
[LINKHOTTNESS]
Diplomats walk out of the U.N. General Assembly in New York during the speech by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday.

UNITED NATIONS ? The U.S. and European delegations walked out of the U.N. speech of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday after he said most people believe the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks in order to assure Israel's survival. Ahmadinejad said it was mostly U.S. government officials who believed a terrorist group was behind the suicide hijacking attacks that brought down New York's World Trade Center and hit the Pentagon.

Another theory, he said, was "that some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy, and its grips on the Middle East, in order to save the Zionist regime."

"The majority of the American people as well as most nations and politicians around the world agree with this view," Ahmadinejad told the 192-nation assembly. The U.S. and several European delegations left shortly after Ahmadinejad made the remarks.

LINK

Quick, someone chop porn onto that chick's laptop!

There was more thuth in Ahmadinejad's speech, than the Obame speech from 2009.

I listened to that kook on Larry King.

oh really? You Sir, or Madam have gone quite insane.

you need to wake up.

he may have foiled a zionist flase flag attack in progress. america should tahnk him.

seriously Amputate - you always strike me as a relatively smart cat - you agree with this BS?

"(Reuters) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday called the September 11 attacks on the United States a "big fabrication" that was used to justify the U.S. war on terrorism, the official IRNA news agency reported.

Ahmadinejad, who often rails against the West and Israel, made the comment in a meeting with Intelligence Ministry personnel.

Ahmadinejad described the destruction of the twin towers in New York on September 11, 2001 as a "complicated intelligence scenario and act," IRNA reported.

He added: "The September 11 incident was a big fabrication as a pretext for the campaign against terrorism and a prelude for staging an invasion against Afghanistan." He did not elaborate......

In his speech to the General Assembly, Ahmadinejad said it was mostly U.S. government officials who believed the Islamist militant group al Qaeda was behind the suicide hijacking attacks that brought down New York's World Trade Center and hit the Pentagon.

Another theory, he said, was "that some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy, and its grips on the Middle East, in order to save the Zionist regime." Ahmadinejad usually refers to Israel as the "Zionist regime."

"The majority of the American people as well as most nations and politicians around the world agree with this view," Ahmadinejad said....

So Amputate are you one of those 911 conspiracy crazies too?

And we all know Obame can't handle the thuth!

If these guys had to fight if war broke out you can bet your fucking asses they'd sit there and listen. But as long as it's not them dying then FUCK DIPLOMACY lets send in our pawns to die while they kill some innocent civilians along the way.

What a fucked up world we live in when we refuse to listen to someone talk but are all too happy to send young men and women to that country to kill them and get killed.

Move to Iran, Amp. It's really that simple.

PornMD who is that in your avatar.. I think I fucked her.

Folk in parts of America believe it was Muslims with box-cutters and a guy in a cave. Outside of USA/Europe it is commonly believed that it was an Inside Job with Controlled Demolitions. A lot is down to what the country's media tell their people.

I think it was like Pearl Harbor. They knew it was coming, and they let it happen, cause they needed the populous to OK going to war. Kinda simple, really.

In 1999 Payne Stewart's private jet didn't go past 10 minutes after it didn't respond before there were fighters scrambled, but 45 minutes after commercial airliners don't respond no fighters scrambled.

Kinda like trying to shoot a moving target (Kennedy) with a $12 blot-action rifle and making 3 out of 3 hits.

Still, I'll take the US and our government over any in the history of the world. :2 cents:

not that i believe this bs, but i found it odd the drills they were practicing on a national level coincidentally on two special days in western history

and i wish our diplomats would just sit through this bs

who cares

I remember that one too, here's the guy being interviewed
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc

Strange coincidence!

haha

check out what was going on during 9/11.. obviously i'm talking about a drill, but which one?

3 guesses and the first 2 don't count

Was there one going on during 9/11 too? Hijacked aircraft being used as weapons perchance?

uncanny, for the big win, what city?

Detroit?

consolation prize :(

a big apple.

I've won worse consolation prizes in my time

Bush did it, and he destroyed the economy and he destroyed the United States... obviously.


Fucking kook jobs

I listened to some of his speech while I was making me some lunch. It was comical really. He said Capitalism is dead, and blamed slavery on the US. Great stuff.

now watch out with all this crazy talk about conspiracies ya'll, don't ya believe what the tv tells ya?

The problem is, not one person on either side of the fence can prove either way. Thus bringing us to the grim reality that is, it quite possibly could have been an inside job. There is simply no way to know, so you can't rule it out.

Rothschild daughter WARNS of bomb attack at U.S. Embassy in Dubai tomorrow to be blamed on U.S. activists?

http://www.firetown.com/blog/2010/09...u-s-activists/


?There?s going to be an attack. That?s going to be the impetus. That?s going to be what it takes to get Congress and the administration talking; we have to get hit again,? the senator said, suggesting that passing a bill before that happens might be more reasonable than what would come afterward.

?If there is a successful attack, there is going to be a real violent reaction in the Congress, where we will react more emotionally than thoughtfully,? Graham said.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.c...0C63240A0E4985

Capitalism IS dead, the world can't last much longer with it and people see that. Maybe not dead but definitely put its better days behind it.

word to big bird

I love it when porn-tards get into politics.

Very interesting..

On the surface it looks pretty hokey to me. :2 cents:

Muslim extremists aren't the sharpest tools in the drawer. They don't live in reality either. I wonder of Amputate was purposely trying to get a rise out of people by the title of this thread. If not, it's ironic that slutboat is the one to call him out on his sanity.

Oh you have no idea how humorous it is.

They sure look good in those beautiful suits.

always wondered if there was a slight bit of truth in these rantings. i mean tower 7 didn't go down its own. lots of conspiracies about that tower. don't know anymore..

Conspiracy theorists make liberals look smart.

The Rothschild bit does but the build up is all over. I'd guess something closer to home and blamed on "homegrown rightwing tea party"..


Risk of small-scale attacks by al-Qaeda and its allies is rising, officials say

By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 22, 2010; 10:50 PM



Al-Qaeda and its allies are likely to attempt small-scale, less sophisticated terrorist attacks in the United States, senior Obama administration officials said Wednesday, noting that it's extremely difficult to detect such threats in advance.

"Unlike large-scale, coordinated, catastrophic attacks, executing smaller-scale attacks requires less planning and fewer pre-operational steps," said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. "Accordingly, there are fewer opportunities to detect such an attack before it occurs."

Terrorism experts have puzzled over al-Qaeda's apparent unwillingness after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to use car bombs, improvised explosives and small arms to conduct assaults in the United States. The group appeared fixated on orchestrating another dramatic mass-casualty event, such as the simultaneous downing of several commercial airliners.

Indeed, attacks inspired by al-Qaeda in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005 involved multiple, coordinated bombings targeting mass-transit systems.

But the risk of a single-target bombing or an attack by a lone gunman has increased, officials say, with the rise of al-Qaeda-affiliated groups in the tribal areas of Pakistan, in Yemen and in Somalia, and with the emergence of radicalized Americans inspired by the ideology of violent jihad.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...203807_pf.html


US Congress warned of home-grown terrorism threat

Al-Qaeda and its allies are likely to attempt small-scale, less sophisticated terrorist attacks in the United States, senior Obama administration officials said Wednesday, noting that it’s extremely difficult to detect such threats in advance.

“Unlike large-scale, coordinated, catastrophic attacks, executing smaller-scale attacks requires less planning and fewer pre-operational steps,” said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. “Accordingly, there are fewer opportunities to detect such an attack before it occurs.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11392083


“He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
http://www.infowars.com/top-clinton-...an-save-obama/


Even tonights CSI was all about "homegrown terrorists" and it's too be continued..

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

this is frightening stuff.

martial law, here we come.

Why always such extremes with you, Amp? Are you always miserable? Or just when you post here?

because reality is extreme.

i'm not miserable billy, i'm absolutely bursting with joy.

that's general and silly, there is obviously some smart people running the show over there. Facing reality is the first step to dealing with reality.

but in the US we have freedom of the press, free from corporate and govt. influence. plus our networks assure us that they are fair and balanced.

you are correct.

you are living a lie.

One day the truth will come out and history will be re-written. Until that day all we can do is speculate.

Either way it was a very tragic event and changed the role and credibility of the US in international politics forever.

Why would Bush or Clinton or whoever supposedly conspired not just get 20 guys to crash the planes?

I mean look, ALL of the theories out there would require hundreds or thousands of people to be perfectly 100% complicit and secret for the rest of their lives. Not to mention some of them require technical accomplishments not possible.

How can an intelligent person not think it's even a BIT far fetched? Why not get 20 emotional retards to do it? I mean seriously, WHY NOT just get 20 assholes to do it? Please dont say you couldnt trust 20 people to do it, so instead they got thousands. Please.

Are assassinations really that hard these days?