GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Micheal Jackson was a pedo frankenstein freak. MAY HE BURN IN HELL (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=912731)

domain seller 06-26-2009 12:29 AM

Micheal Jackson was a pedo frankenstein freak. MAY HE BURN IN HELL
 
If he was not famous he would have been spend the rest of his life in prison.

MJ can go fuck himself!!!!

2012 06-26-2009 12:30 AM


Mr.Right - Banned For Life 06-26-2009 12:31 AM

Goodnight sweet prince.

ThunderBalls 06-26-2009 12:34 AM

Big mistake trying to resolve your childhood issues on GFY :2 cents:

roly 06-26-2009 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by domain seller (Post 16001052)
If he was not famous he would have been spend the rest of his life in prison.

MJ can go fuck himself!!!!

well said. it's a bizarre world we live in when a middle aged man could have spent his entire adult life enticing children into his bed, but because he was famous and made great music he is classed by so many as "just a bit mixed up".

Matyko 06-26-2009 01:47 AM

Michael Jackson is a true humanitarian, an example to us all. He has devoted much time and money to a wide range of charities. He loves children and takes time out when touring secretly visting sick children. He also has special rooms at his home Neverland for sick and terminally ill children to stay over. He was listed in the 2000 edition of the Guiness Book Of World Records for breaking the world record for the "Most Charities Supported By a Pop Star". It states that Michael Jackson has supported 39 charity organizations either with monetary donations through sponsorships of their projects or by participating in their silent auction.

We have made an alphabetical list of known charities that Michael Jackson has individualy supported publically throughout his career. Michael Jackson also helped set up Heal The World Foundation, the charities this has supported have not been listed. Read our Heal The World/kids page for details of this foundation.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/charities.html

bobby666 06-26-2009 01:49 AM

he was so nice, he loved all children and fucked even some of them

SBJ 06-26-2009 01:52 AM

finally a jackson thread worth posting in.. Sorry but maybe he was a great artist at one time but the guy.. well you all know what he is.

roly 06-26-2009 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001146)
Michael Jackson is a true humanitarian, an example to us all. He has devoted much time and money to a wide range of charities. He loves children and takes time out when touring secretly visting sick children. He also has special rooms at his home Neverland for sick and terminally ill children to stay over. He was listed in the 2000 edition of the Guiness Book Of World Records for breaking the world record for the "Most Charities Supported By a Pop Star". It states that Michael Jackson has supported 39 charity organizations either with monetary donations through sponsorships of their projects or by participating in their silent auction.

We have made an alphabetical list of known charities that Michael Jackson has individualy supported publically throughout his career. Michael Jackson also helped set up Heal The World Foundation, the charities this has supported have not been listed. Read our Heal The World/kids page for details of this foundation.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/charities.html

so if your rich enough to support lots of charities its ok to sleep with kids?

Blazed 06-26-2009 02:02 AM

Reports of Michael Jackson suffering a heart attack are incorrect.

He was actually found in the childrens ward having a stroke...

Matyko 06-26-2009 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 16001157)
so if your rich enough to support lots of charities its ok to sleep with kids?

As far as I know it was never prooved that he molested children. Leeches were trying to use him to make money via saying he did this and that.

It's the media's fault that most ppl connect him to pedo shit.

As a PsyTrance/PsyRock/DanceHall/Reggae addict I am not a fan of Michael but I admit he did some great songs and things. And I believe he is innocent. Maybe I am wrong. But what is happening now is pure necromania :2 cents:

I am sure most ppl say beating women is a very bad thing. John Lennon admitted he did this for a while. Do you judge him based on this or do you judge him on what he did with his music and acts?

Kard63 06-26-2009 02:44 AM

I don't think he was a pedo.

solopimps 06-26-2009 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kard63 (Post 16001236)
I don't think he was a pedo.

even if he was or wasn't.... ANYONE who dangles there own child over a hotel balcony is SICK, blah blah blah is music was great this and that... If any normal person were caught doing this they'd be in jail. :2 cents:

greg80 06-26-2009 03:04 AM

agreed! finaly a good thread on mj

Blazed 06-26-2009 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001208)
As far as I know it was never prooved that he molested children. Leeches were trying to use him to make money via saying he did this and that.

It's the media's fault that most ppl connect him to pedo shit.

As a PsyTrance/PsyRock/DanceHall/Reggae addict I am not a fan of Michael but I admit he did some great songs and things. And I believe he is innocent. Maybe I am wrong. But what is happening now is pure necromania :2 cents:

I am sure most ppl say beating women is a very bad thing. John Lennon admitted he did this for a while. Do you judge him based on this or do you judge him on what he did with his music and acts?

Why did he pay these people off then?

seeandsee 06-26-2009 03:09 AM

you are probably right

Di Vito 06-26-2009 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blazed (Post 16001271)
Why did he pay these people off then?

I never met him but I thinks it's because he thought like a child, he was worn down and just wanted it all to end. He knew what it would look like by paying people off (guilty) but obviously wasn't guilty otherwise he wouldn't of done it. He didn't want to spend a year in the courts etc.

R.I.P Mr.Jackson you were a complete legend

intellichat 06-26-2009 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderBalls (Post 16001055)
Big mistake trying to resolve your childhood issues on GFY :2 cents:

Haha this one made me smile

Blazed 06-26-2009 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Di Vito (Post 16001366)
I never met him but I thinks it's because he thought like a child, he was worn down and just wanted it all to end. He knew what it would look like by paying people off (guilty) but obviously wasn't guilty otherwise he wouldn't of done it. He didn't want to spend a year in the courts etc.

R.I.P Mr.Jackson you were a complete legend

Ah the old "i think like a child" excuse, which also exempts him from taking responsiblity for
sharing a bed with a boy and giving him "jesus juice", which is most likely alcohol (thats being kind and assuming it was not cum).

And of course he held that baby out of a window because he was thinking like a child, we all know how children love holding babies out of windows, you hear about it all the time.

roly 06-26-2009 04:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001208)
As far as I know it was never prooved that he molested children. Leeches were trying to use him to make money via saying he did this and that.

It's the media's fault that most ppl connect him to pedo shit.

As a PsyTrance/PsyRock/DanceHall/Reggae addict I am not a fan of Michael but I admit he did some great songs and things. And I believe he is innocent. Maybe I am wrong. But what is happening now is pure necromania :2 cents:

I am sure most ppl say beating women is a very bad thing. John Lennon admitted he did this for a while. Do you judge him based on this or do you judge him on what he did with his music and acts?

i don't think even he denied that he slept in the same bed as young boys, that's why he was connected to paedo shit, the media just reported that. even if, and its a very big if, nothing untoward was going on, it's extremely unhealthy behaviour for a middle aged man.

here's a question to all those that say he was completly innocent, if you had a young boy, would you let him stay alone over night with him? i wouldn't.

just a punk 06-26-2009 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 16001141)
well said. it's a bizarre world we live in when a middle aged man could have spent his entire adult life enticing children into his bed, but because he was famous and made great music he is classed by so many as "just a bit mixed up".

First of all, he was not adjudged. Only the court have a right to say if someone guilty or not.

Now about famous people. What will you say about these dudes: Charlie Chaplin, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Hans Christian Andersen etc? Any comments?

voa 06-26-2009 04:56 AM

He was a one of the most influence musician in the last 30 years

SpicyM 06-26-2009 05:36 AM

Why dont you let the courts judge people instead? He wasnt found guilty, was he?

Matyko 06-26-2009 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 16001432)
i don't think even he denied that he slept in the same bed as young boys, that's why he was connected to paedo shit, the media just reported that. even if, and its a very big if, nothing untoward was going on, it's extremely unhealthy behaviour for a middle aged man.

here's a question to all those that say he was completly innocent, if you had a young boy, would you let him stay alone over night with him? i wouldn't.

However I have only a daughter so far, I can tell you for sure: I would let my son spend a night there. As I do trust our parenting skills and also I would trust my son and Michael as well, I think nothing wrong could happen. :2 cents:

And I join that side who says he was never found guilty at all. If you look further than the surface of this complex issue, you can see witnesses like Macaulay Culkin who told the jury he spent time w Michael [even alone if i remember well] and nothing wrong happened.

I agree with you that its probably not healthy to spend the time w young boys, but man, coaches and LOT other ppl spend time w lots of young boys w/o any problems having a quite close relationship with them... And there's nothing wrong with it either.

Anyway, I am going back to work, will look back when the Sun is saying goodbye for today to the Old Continent.

roly 06-26-2009 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 16001507)
Why dont you let the courts judge people instead? He wasnt found guilty, was he?

lol, neither was oj simpson

Chicks Delivery 06-26-2009 05:55 AM

Michael was a legend!

Sid70 06-26-2009 06:00 AM

a legendary person, at least for the generation of 70

OG LennyT 06-26-2009 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001146)
Michael Jackson is a true humanitarian, an example to us all. He has devoted much time and money to a wide range of charities. He loves children and takes time out when touring secretly visting sick children. He also has special rooms at his home Neverland for sick and terminally ill children to stay over. He was listed in the 2000 edition of the Guiness Book Of World Records for breaking the world record for the "Most Charities Supported By a Pop Star". It states that Michael Jackson has supported 39 charity organizations either with monetary donations through sponsorships of their projects or by participating in their silent auction.

We have made an alphabetical list of known charities that Michael Jackson has individualy supported publically throughout his career. Michael Jackson also helped set up Heal The World Foundation, the charities this has supported have not been listed. Read our Heal The World/kids page for details of this foundation.

http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/charities.html

mhm.. yep, he loved the kiddies alright :jerkoff

Vicious_B 06-26-2009 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blazed (Post 16001271)
Why did he pay these people off then?


Why did they accept a settlement? I would never accept money instead of justice for someone hurting one of my children.

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 16001579)
lol, neither was oj simpson

OJ was found guilty in the second civil trial.

SpicyM 06-26-2009 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 16001579)
lol, neither was oj simpson


I dont know who was oj simpson

Iron Fist 06-26-2009 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderBalls (Post 16001055)
Big mistake trying to resolve your childhood issues on GFY :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

acctman 06-26-2009 06:21 AM

most people are remembering him as an Artist, yes his personal adult and childhood life is in question but he was a great artist. And if anything decades from now people will still know his music.

tranza 06-26-2009 06:32 AM

I don't think he was a pedo, this is what media said... Nobody knows the truth.

Agent 488 06-26-2009 06:40 AM

mj was as much a pedo as lewis carroll was.

LadyMischief 06-26-2009 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 16001436)
First of all, he was not adjudged. Only the court have a right to say if someone guilty or not.

Now about famous people. What will you say about these dudes: Charlie Chaplin, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Hans Christian Andersen etc? Any comments?

Bullshit. Just because a court didn't find him guilty doesn't mean he wasn't.. it means he managed to slip out of their grasp. Ever heard of OJ?

brassmonkey 06-26-2009 06:52 AM

damn:1orglaugh:helpme

just a punk 06-26-2009 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16001752)
Bullshit. Just because a court didn't find him guilty doesn't mean he wasn't.. it means he managed to slip out of their grasp. Ever heard of OJ?

OJ Simpson again? This name was called in this thread a few times already. Sorry, the only Stimson I know is Homer.

BTW, so what about Charlie Chaplin, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, Lewis Carroll and Hans Christian Andersen - may the burn in hell as well? No Chaplin's movies on your TV, no Tchaikovsky music, no Andersen's and Lewis Carroll tales for... KIDS? Answer this question please.

CDSmith 06-26-2009 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001548)
However I have only a daughter so far, I can tell you for sure: I would let my son spend a night there. As I do trust our parenting skills and also I would trust my son and Michael as well, I think nothing wrong could happen. :2 cents:

Sorry, but any parent who thinks it's okay for a grown man in his 40's to be having sleepovers with other people's young boys and having them share his bed and give them "jesus juice" etc is either out to make a buck off their kid or just plainly has a screw loose in their head.

Which one are you?

Agent 488 06-26-2009 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 16001548)
However I have only a daughter so far, I can tell you for sure: I would let my son spend a night there. As I do trust our parenting skills and also I would trust my son and Michael as well, I think nothing wrong could happen. :2 cents

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Blazed 06-26-2009 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicksMichele (Post 16001641)
Why did they accept a settlement? I would never accept money instead of justice for someone hurting one of my children.



OJ was found guilty in the second civil trial.

Yes you would, if Jackson would have been guilty he would have been sent to a cushty prison and kept away from the real mean criminals. Or you take the settlement which offers security for the rest of your whole families life, 9/10 would take the money. It is a lot more odd offering an out of court settlement when you are innocent than it is accepting the settlement.

LadyMischief 06-26-2009 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blazed (Post 16001170)
Reports of Michael Jackson suffering a heart attack are incorrect.

He was actually found in the childrens ward having a stroke...

OMG LoL!!!!

LadyMischief 06-26-2009 07:30 AM

Anyone ever stop to think that he might have been supporting those children's charities out of a sense of guilt? He sure spent most of his life trying not to be who he was, or hiding, running away, making excuses. Those are the actions of someone with a guilt complex, not a philanthropist.

Sarah_Jayne 06-26-2009 07:45 AM

Regardless of if he actually did anything with a child, he was clearly mentally ill with nobody willing to stand up to that. His early music was fantastic, his later life made it pretty much impossible for me to listen to that music without feeling dirty about it either because of the kids or his clear mental illness (which includes the baby dangling). I actually listened a lot of those songs today for the first time in many years.

PR_Glen 06-26-2009 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief (Post 16001937)
Anyone ever stop to think that he might have been supporting those children's charities out of a sense of guilt? He sure spent most of his life trying not to be who he was, or hiding, running away, making excuses. Those are the actions of someone with a guilt complex, not a philanthropist.

Oh very nice... now someone is guilty of something for donating to charities???

He was donating to charities long before he was accused of any of that shit. He definitely had inappropriate relationships with some of the children, nobody here is arguing the fact that isn't messed up, but there is one hell of a difference between having a slumber party with an adult in the room and someone going around molesting children...

allegations and facts are TWO VERY different things.

Iron Fist 06-26-2009 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 16001863)
Sorry, but any parent who thinks it's okay for a grown man in his 40's to be having sleepovers with other people's young boys and having them share his bed and give them "jesus juice" etc is either out to make a buck off their kid or just plainly has a screw loose in their head.

http://www.nnteenmodels.net/gfy/clapping.gif

roly 06-26-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 16001644)
I dont know who was oj simpson

another celebrity who's fame and money got him off what should have been a clear guilty verdict.

kowalsky 06-26-2009 08:38 AM

Itīs sad to see rich people donīt go to jail as any other person would do it...

domain seller 06-26-2009 08:44 AM

I am just jealous that he had both a chimp and a llama. I hear Bubbles is still alive. Lois the llama died a few years back:(

http://www.mountlehmanllamas.com/mic...ksonpuzzle.jpg

Tom_PM 06-26-2009 08:50 AM

So much for innocent until proven guilty. All you need is a lot of tv commentators who think they know what the verdict will be, and so lead you down the path that they think he'll be guil....... oops!

domain seller 06-26-2009 08:59 AM

1. rubba rubba
Sordid game Michael 'Wacko' Jackson is alleged to have involved some Neverland guests in, where the protagonists rub against each other for sexual arousal
"He's my rubba rubba friend"

2. Rubba Rubba
game played with little boys if you are a rich perverted singer that lives in Neverland.
"Michael and I played rubba rubba all through the night at his theme park."


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123