He was a great singer and dancer and I enjoyed his music when he was at the top. If judges aquit him on all counts, maybe he was not a pedo, who knows the truth? May he rest in peace ... :(

I see your point and agree. I am not saying I would send me 8 yr old son for a sleepover party w M, but it has some other factors as well: how old kid were there for sleepovers? What acts were prooved? Whats this weird jesus juice - i've never heard of it. But most the important thing is: if the kid wants to go and have fun or not. And if he wants, until what time? For example I see really no bad things is several kids [age 12+] are invited to have fun at M's territory: I am sure he is not alone there with the kids, some staff and bodyguards would be nearby, so imo no bad things could happen for real. But obviously I agree that sending over my 8yr old kid alone for a sleepover with a weirdo [no offense, but he is some kind of weirdo for sure] is a no-no.

read some of the stuff over at the smoking gun detailing mj's child grooming. it's downright chilling.

Someone is innocent until proven innocent. Michael Jackson got acquited. Hence's he's innocent.

Uhm that doesn't mean that I would have had my children (If I had any) spend the night at Neverland.

Michael Jackson is to be cremated and sprinkled into curry so kids can feel him go through their ass one more time.

if he really was a pederass (and probably was) burn him i agree

I can say with absolute authority as a mother of 2 that if one of my children were hurt or molested by someone there is NO AMOUNT OF MONEY that would make me settle out of court. Not just for my child's sake but also for any potential victims sakes. If they were worried about being to provide for their child therapy or whatever they could have sued him after in a civil case.

You're also not a person inclined to use their children's health, or well being as a pawn against someone with insane amounts of cash.

Its time to hear the truth about Micheal! Judge Judy's

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fEHVR9Hj_b0

That trial was never "supposed" to happen. What was supposed to happen was mom and kid accuse him, get the press whipped up, maybe jackson makes another video saying he didnt do shit and to bring on the trial. Then mom and kid were supposed to deal out of court for a settlement. Please do not forget that they had done this before!

Well along comes the prosecution who says to mom and kid, look jerks, if he molested you then we're busting in and arresting him and you WILL testify, got me? And mom and kid shook in their boots and said ok mister man, and then that entire fiasco ramped up. The kid was a horrible witness on the stand. Mechanical, no emotion, just going through the planned Q & A as rehearsed. Fell apart on cross with the I'm not sure, I dont remember blah blah.

You guys, he was not "normal" as maybe you and I refer to "normal". But they couldnt even prove that an abnormal weirdo recluse did anything illegal! And some of you still figure, "well he just didnt get caught"? Well why dont you tell us how long it takes to "catch" someone who isn't doing what you plan to catch them doing? Just how long does that take?

One word. OJ.

i heard he paid em 20m

Does anyone have factual evidence he was a pedo? NO!! So shut the fuck up unless u can post the photographic or video evidence in this thread.

R.I.P. Lord Moonwalk.

In the OJ case I was thinking wow, he is really getting proven guilty... But OJ "won" that case because the defense was so good at showing the police and detective work was like keystone cops. Criminalist Dennis Fung not knowing he carried out his posse box with evidence in it which the defense team caught on a freaking tv news tape at their hotel. Detective Van Atter taking oj's shoes and vial of BLOOD home in his CARS TRUNK before checking them into the evidence locker!! (part of the evidence was a teensy blood drop on a shoe. ouch) And theres Mark Furman pleading the 5th rather than admit he'd used the N word. etc etc etc.

this isn't a MJ tribute thread. jackson himself admitted that he often shared the same bed as young boys, do you not think those are the actions of a pedo?

He was rich enough to get away with it, too.

That case had EVIDENCE this one had ALLEGATIONS and heresy thats why he never got convicted. The law doesn't care whether the parents want to press charges or not, they can do that themselves if they had enough evidence or sound witnesses.



PS. You live in my home town, ishn't that veird?? :)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...