GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Starting an Affiliate Program - CCBill or Epoch? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=899290)

BFT3K 04-12-2009 10:34 AM

Starting an Affiliate Program - CCBill or Epoch?
 
Any webmaster advice appreciated.

Does either provide better/easier tools?

Does it matter, from an affiliate's standpoint?

Thanks in advance!

sortie 04-12-2009 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15735457)
Any webmaster advice appreciated.

Does either provide better/easier tools?

Does it matter, from an affiliate's standpoint?

Thanks in advance!

Because of failing sponsors in a rough climate I prefer to use CCBill sites that
only use the CCbill affiliate software. No cascading to other billing.
None of my info on the sponsor's site.

Further if you don't have hosted flvs then there is zero chance I will ever use your
site.

BV 04-12-2009 11:03 AM

Really this is not even a question. CCBill by far.

PornDiscounts-R 04-12-2009 11:03 AM

CCBill for sure.

And with the new admin and tools coming out soon, it will be even better

commonsense 04-12-2009 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 15735468)
Because of failing sponsors in a rough climate I prefer to use CCBill sites that
only use the CCbill affiliate software. No cascading to other billing.
None of my info on the sponsor's site.

Further if you don't have hosted flvs then there is zero chance I will ever use your
site.

:1orglaugh


The majority of affiliates that make sales DO NOT use or need flvs, much less hosted flvs.

BFT3K, it more or less depends on the type of sites. But in most cases go with CCBill. Fact is there are many more affiliates that use and trust CCBill. And every affiliate on earth has a ccbill account

PornDiscounts-R 04-12-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 15735500)
Really this is not even a question. CCBill by far.

Glad to see we agree on that one :thumbsup

btw, just signed up for your program like an hour ago and will add all 4 sites to my latest project in a bit :)

seeandsee 04-12-2009 11:06 AM

CCbill from me

BV 04-12-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebestamateur (Post 15735510)
Glad to see we agree on that one :thumbsup

btw, just signed up for your program like an hour ago and will add all 4 sites to my latest project in a bit :)


Super. May the force be with you. :thumbsup

BFT3K 04-12-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 15735468)
No cascading to other billing. None of my info on the sponsor's site.

Please elaborate. Thanks...

commonsense 04-12-2009 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15735518)
Please elaborate. Thanks...

Don't listen to him, its obvious he's an idiot.

BFT3K 04-12-2009 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 15735523)
Don't listen to him, its obvious he's an idiot.

Okay, thanks! :1orglaugh

Manowar 04-12-2009 11:17 AM

go with ccbill

BFT3K 04-12-2009 11:24 AM

Okay, thanks everyone. Looks like CCBill is the clear winner!

Any advice about Epoch as a second biller, in a cascade?

Is it worth the $750 per additional biller?

Barefootsies 04-12-2009 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 15735505)
:1orglaugh


The majority of affiliates that make sales DO NOT use or need flvs, much less hosted flvs.

:2 cents:

Bhunter 04-12-2009 11:28 AM

ccbill cascaded with segpay works great.

HorseShit 04-12-2009 11:43 AM

they are both good companies and their rates are very similar

Kiwigirl 04-12-2009 11:54 AM

Nothing against the other company you mentioned but I am a fond Ccbill supporter.
:)

MrDeiz 04-12-2009 12:13 PM

CCBill for sure

better billing, better for affiliates

alexchechs 04-12-2009 12:30 PM

CCBill has been good for us and using third party tools such as CCB Tools works well. Plus with CCBill you can always set Epoch on your cascading billing so it's a Win Win situation.

blonda80 04-12-2009 12:32 PM

ccbill :)

Barefootsies 04-12-2009 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daizzzy (Post 15735672)
CCBill for sure

better billing, better for affiliates


sortie 04-12-2009 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 15735505)
:1orglaugh


The majority of affiliates that make sales DO NOT use or need flvs, much less hosted flvs.

:1orglaugh

True dude, no one would argue that.
But I already have enough sponsors, I've been with some going on 10 years now.
So why try a new sponsor unless they can offer me something exceptional.

I mean, if I had your pay site banner up for 10 years then why would I take it
down or move it to try something else?

AGS-17 04-12-2009 01:56 PM

CCBILL Only :)

2MuchMark 04-12-2009 02:14 PM

Both are cool

bbm 04-12-2009 02:56 PM

I think - Epoch :)

Gaybucks 04-13-2009 10:53 PM

We've been with both, we've had both as primary billers.

There's simply no comparison. CCBill is simply extraordinary.

No BS, no runarounds, no excuses. I can't say the same for the competition.

As for using CCBill as primary and cascading to Epoch or Segpay, that would probably be fine.

However, if you are just starting out and don't have the volume to justify the extra Visa fee, it probably doesn't make sense to do that right now; a large % of the declines we're seeing are NSF from debit cards, and the other big % is basic declines (which usually means card over limit) so those customers aren't going to get approved on another biller's cascade anyway.

In 6 months or a year when you have some volume, then it might make sense to go with an alternate biller in cascade.

Iron Fist 04-13-2009 10:59 PM

Go Epoch!!!!!

NO.....

JUST JOKES!!!!

CCBILL only!

Epoch is only for those who want to lose all their affiliates because their backend sucks balls. I wonder how long it will be until I make ONE sale with SpookyCash since them moving from CCbill to Epoch.... just sayin.

BFT3K 04-15-2009 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead (Post 15740900)
Epoch is only for those who want to lose all their affiliates because their backend sucks balls. I wonder how long it will be until I make ONE sale with SpookyCash since them moving from CCbill to Epoch.... just sayin.

So if you set up CCBill as the primary, and you offer a CCBill affiliate program, then using Epoch as a secondary will piss off your affiliates? How is that? Is it better to not have a secondary biller at all? What about SegPay as a secondary? Same thing?

BV 04-15-2009 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15749694)
So if you set up CCBill as the primary, and you offer a CCBill affiliate program, then using Epoch as a secondary will piss off your affiliates? How is that? Is it better to not have a secondary biller at all? What about SegPay as a secondary? Same thing?

That won't piss anyone off. CCbill is integrated with Epoch for cascading.

But seriously, cascade billing is over rated. It doesn't increase sales by any serious amount. So for increasing sales it has minimal effects. <1%

Now if you are larger and looking to spread your eggs out and rotate primary billers, then yah go for it. I am pretty sure you can even do that with CCBill's script. ie: run epoch as primary and ccbill second.

BFT3K 04-15-2009 11:44 PM

I've been told that if a person joins a CCBill site, opting for a recurring billing option, but then cancels before any rebilling occurs, that CCBill's merchant bank will flag that person for committing a form of fraud. Then, whenever that person attempts to join another CCBill site, they will be rejected. With no secondary processor as a back-up, you will simply lose the sale.

Is there any truth to this, or is this misinformation?

BV 04-16-2009 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15749882)
I've been told that if a person joins a CCBill site, opting for a recurring billing option, but then cancels before any rebilling occurs, that CCBill's merchant bank will flag that person for committing a form of fraud. Then, whenever that person attempts to join another CCBill site, they will be rejected. With no secondary processor as a back-up, you will simply lose the sale.

Is there any truth to this, or is this misinformation?

that's bullshit

i have countless members that join and cancel and join and cancel over years

NinjaSteve 04-16-2009 02:30 AM

Why not use Nats + Paycom?

tornell 04-16-2009 03:15 AM

primary ccbill, backup epoch :)

CarlosTheGaucho 04-16-2009 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by commonsense (Post 15735505)

But in most cases go with CCBill. Fact is there are many more affiliates that use and trust CCBill. And every affiliate on earth has a ccbill account

That's correct,

I would also add:

- hassle free administration (maybe I'm not a typical user since I used to be a geek) but I sure admire the software for its easy to get in interface and many practical functionalities that are easy to understand

- hassle free support (only one single very much minor thing that ever happened and didn't affect the finance in any way)


But yes, it's by far mainly a question of trust and guaranteed payouts.

Theoretically you HAVE TO get better conversions and $ / 1000 uniques with a suitable cascade, but even then it's always good to have a ccbill option as an alternative.

Although I don't understand it from the affiliate and common sense point of view, then again, if many fuck and fucked someone in the ass in the past, it's not that easy to reset the memory.

CarlosTheGaucho 04-16-2009 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 15749778)

Now if you are larger and looking to spread your eggs out and rotate primary billers, then yah go for it. I am pretty sure you can even do that with CCBill's script. ie: run epoch as primary and ccbill second.

I'm not sure about this, that wouldn't make that much sense.

I know for sure that if you want to use the Epoch's affiliate back end (trimmed MPA3) you have to use Epoch as primary.

Makes sense to me.

Joshua G 04-16-2009 04:57 AM

i've been using CCBill for years, no problemo. In fact CCbill makes me feel warm & fuzzy that the site i'm signing up for is legit.

SBJ 04-16-2009 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaybucks (Post 15740879)
...
As for using CCBill as primary and cascading to Epoch or Segpay, that would probably be fine.

However, if you are just starting out and don't have the volume to justify the extra Visa fee, it probably doesn't make sense to do that right now; a large % of the declines we're seeing are NSF from debit cards, and the other big % is basic declines (which usually means card over limit) so those customers aren't going to get approved on another biller's cascade anyway.

In 6 months or a year when you have some volume, then it might make sense to go with an alternate biller in cascade.


Yup I agree with this. Just starting out there is no need to spend the extra $750 but as you traffic and number of sites grow then sure add a cascade via ccbill and you will see results. I'm thinking the next solo girl site I launch I will add the cascade option myself.

I love ccbill and would never use anything else! :thumbsup

rayadp05 04-16-2009 05:23 AM

I have been using CCBill for my affiliate program for years now and have never had any problems at all and the affiliates are very happy with it as CCBill is a name that you can trust and is also very well known. Not to say that Epoch is not a well known company but I say, your best bet is to go with CCBill. :thumbsup

selena 04-16-2009 06:31 AM

Taking off my program rep hat for a moment, and speaking 100% as an affiliate...

hands down CCBill.

Quick reasons are trust factor, and ability to promote different sponsors without having to worry about meeting the minimum of each. Though you may be able to do that w/ Epoch, I don't know.

skrinkladoo 04-16-2009 06:34 AM

wow, i didnt realize how popular ccbill became.

FrozenJag 04-16-2009 06:47 AM

Sorry for being slightly off topic but has anyone used Zombaio? Their way way lower fees are enticing. Plus the 0 dollar startup instead of 750.

Im trying to make some of the same decisions as the thread starter only im going to use NATS so not worried about the affiliate tracking part of the processors.

Any thoughts?

Kron 04-16-2009 06:50 AM

one more vote for ccbill

BFT3K 04-16-2009 08:41 AM

I've been told that if a person joins a CCBill site, opting for a recurring billing option, but then cancels before any rebilling occurs, that CCBill's merchant bank will flag that person for committing a form of fraud. Then, whenever that person attempts to join another CCBill site, they will be rejected. With no secondary processor as a back-up, you will simply lose the sale.

Is there any truth to this, or is this misinformation?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 15749923)
that's bullshit

i have countless members that join and cancel and join and cancel over years

Thanks BV. The information above was actually told to me by a representative at one of the non-CCBill payment processors I've been communicating with, so your response is very interesting.

I would rather not pay $750 for another processor, but if I do add another biller they would have to work with my upcoming CCBill affiliate program, so Epoch and/or SegPay seem to be the only options.

I will say this; around 3 weeks ago I removed a second billing option from my join page, based upon the recent credibility of that processor (not Epoch or SegPay). With ONLY CCBill on my join page, sales have dropped over 25% since then, with no other changes whatsoever, so it is easy to believe a second biller is important, but from the replies on this thread, that does not seem to be the case. Still a mystery regarding the past 3 weeks however, so I am left scratching my head.

whatif_3 04-16-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrozenJag (Post 15750629)
Sorry for being slightly off topic but has anyone used Zombaio? Their way way lower fees are enticing. Plus the 0 dollar startup instead of 750.

Im trying to make some of the same decisions as the thread starter only im going to use NATS so not worried about the affiliate tracking part of the processors.

Any thoughts?

why would you trust some no-name with your $ in an industry where 95% of the billing companies have gone under taking peoples money with them?

you save a few pennies but risk losing 60% of your business

webmasterchecks 04-16-2009 09:50 AM

ccbill was the xbiz winner 2 years in a row :)

great people over there, we dealt with them with the phx forum sponsorships over the past few months, ron, sherri, nick, amazing service oriented company

do not know much about epoch, but why look elsewhere when you are dealing with such a high caliber company thats been the billing flagship for 10+ years?

FrozenJag 04-16-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3 (Post 15751213)
why would you trust some no-name with your $ in an industry where 95% of the billing companies have gone under taking peoples money with them?

you save a few pennies but risk losing 60% of your business

I agree, at this point I am leary of them, but thats one of the reasons im looking for other peoples experiences. :)

If all experiences are great then it would be a tough decision not to try them out.

BV 04-16-2009 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 15750964)
I've been told that if a person joins a CCBill site, opting for a recurring billing option, but then cancels before any rebilling occurs, that CCBill's merchant bank will flag that person for committing a form of fraud. Then, whenever that person attempts to join another CCBill site, they will be rejected. With no secondary processor as a back-up, you will simply lose the sale.

Is there any truth to this, or is this misinformation?



Thanks BV. The information above was actually told to me by a representative at one of the non-CCBill payment processors I've been communicating with, so your response is very interesting.

I would rather not pay $750 for another processor, but if I do add another biller they would have to work with my upcoming CCBill affiliate program, so Epoch and/or SegPay seem to be the only options.

I will say this; around 3 weeks ago I removed a second billing option from my join page, based upon the recent credibility of that processor (not Epoch or SegPay). With ONLY CCBill on my join page, sales have dropped over 25% since then, with no other changes whatsoever, so it is easy to believe a second biller is important, but from the replies on this thread, that does not seem to be the case. Still a mystery regarding the past 3 weeks however, so I am left scratching my head.

Probably just a trend, sales go up and down, lately more down, and there is no way to say nothing has changed. Think about it. It has changed. You don't have the same surfers hitting your site every day, it's a revolving door of new surfers and a constant volatile changing economy day by day.

BV 04-16-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho (Post 15750269)
I'm not sure about this, that wouldn't make that much sense.

I know for sure that if you want to use the Epoch's affiliate back end (trimmed MPA3) you have to use Epoch as primary.

Makes sense to me.

Well I double checked and yes you can, I just looked at the traffic manager admin again and yes it is possible.

Furthermore all payments to affiliates are still made by CCBill.

Pretty cool huh?

Tanker 04-16-2009 12:18 PM

I would say use CCBill as your primary and when you have enough business to justify adding another processor integrate one of the processors that CCBill will cascade to and give your affiliate the credit for the sale.


If you have any questions about running a CCBill program feel free to hit me up anytime, I am always online!

GothBuXXX 04-16-2009 12:24 PM

Well I have an Epoch Program so maybe I am biased.
I don't see what is wrong with epoch at all?
Honestly the only reason it might not be as good is because ccbill is just known better.
epochs sales are equal to ccbills in my experience....after all the customer doesn't care.
However, affiliates are obviously opinionated and so that is something to consider :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123