GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Alana Leigh for NUBILES.NET (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=830709)

Grapesoda 05-25-2008 04:07 PM

Alana Leigh for NUBILES.NET
 
here ya go guys and gals, a few pics for your Sunday viewing pleasure. if you aren't promoting nubiles.net , better get busy :)

http://www.wantontalk.com/al2.jpg

http://www.wantontalk.com/al3.jpg

mailman 05-25-2008 04:10 PM

Nice... :) i like a girl thats not so "FIT"

Jim_Gunn 05-25-2008 04:22 PM

Your photography is great as always, but the model is not skinny enough for my liking.

Grapesoda 05-25-2008 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn (Post 14235306)
Your photography is great as always, but the model is not skinny enough for my liking.

thanks, as a shooter I shot who I am hired to shoot. program owners must meet the needs of more than one set of 'urges' to stay competitive. btw the HDV I'm shooting is starting to look just like my photography. -bmb

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 05-25-2008 04:26 PM

i'd happily hit it. i like obtainable girls, haha.

Jim_Gunn 05-25-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235316)
thanks, as a shooter I shot who I am hired to shoot. program owners must meet the needs of more than one set of 'urges' to stay competitive. btw the HDV I'm shooting is starting to look just like my photography. -bmb

I totally understand. I sometimes film MILF and interracial scenes neither of which are my personal favorite niches, but I think I do a good job with it anyway. I am a big fan of HDV too, it can look great with the right lighting.

Grapesoda 05-25-2008 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn (Post 14235335)
I totally understand. I sometimes film MILF and interracial scenes neither of which are my personal favorite niches, but I think I do a good job with it anyway. I am a big fan of HDV too, it can look great with the right lighting.

I pretty much hate 16x9 :)

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 05-25-2008 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235227)

What are the lines above and below her belly button? Was she wearing a tight midriff corset or something prior to getting naked?

I try to do any tight fitting outfits last, and encourage models to wear loose fitting clothes (including no undies) prior to the shoot.

The worst is when a model shows up wearing those roman lace up shoes - it takes forever for those lines to fade out:

http://www.shoebunny.com/images/chri..._zellweger.jpg

Cute face, and her make-up is just right... :thumbsup

ADG

Spunky 05-25-2008 04:52 PM

She's a cutie,nice rump on her

Jim_Gunn 05-25-2008 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235345)
I pretty much hate 16x9 :)

I have gotten used to it after a few years of HDV filming although I think that 4x3 is generally still more practical for porn viewing. 16x9 is useful for certain scenarios however, like the site I film that consists entirely of b/g/g three-way scenes. They can really spread out horizontally on the bed and you can see all the action simultaneously in the frame better than 4x3 in that case.

LexiLexxx 05-25-2008 04:56 PM

[QUOTE=AsianDivaGirlsWebDude;14235368]What are the lines above and below her belly button? Was she wearing a tight midriff corset or something prior to getting naked?

I try to do any tight fitting outfits last, and encourage models to wear loose fitting clothes (including no undies) prior to the shoot.

The worst is when a model shows up wearing those roman lace up shoes - it takes forever for those lines to fade out:

http://www.shoebunny.com/images/chri..._zellweger.jpg

Cute face, and her make-up is just right... :thumbsup

ADG[/QUOTE

Very true, but those lace -up shoes are HOT! The picture in general is very fetish looking and I would hang it on my wall.
:thumbsup

marcop 05-25-2008 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235345)
I pretty much hate 16x9 :)

Me too. Whoever came up with that aspect ratio wasn't a porn fan. We need to come up with a porn aspect ratio closer to 4:3, which worked really well for shooting all sexual positions. There's way too much wasted space when shooting most porn activity. I've come to the conclusion that shooting porn in HD is merely a marketing gimmick. Anyone else feel that way?

Mistah Charlie 05-25-2008 05:03 PM

I would so hit it.

marcop 05-25-2008 05:03 PM

How about we black out a bit of either end of the 16:9 frame to make a 3:2 frame, just like the 35mm aspect ratio? That way it's closer to 4:3, but adds a little width, and it's a ratio that the eye is used to. We can call it the "Porn Ratio" and create our very own technical specs for it.

Grapesoda 05-25-2008 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn (Post 14235386)
I have gotten used to it after a few years of HDV filming although I think that 4x3 is generally still more practical for porn viewing. 16x9 is useful for certain scenarios however, like the site I film that consists entirely of b/g/g three-way scenes. They can really spread out horizontally on the bed and you can see all the action simultaneously in the frame better than 4x3 in that case.

shot a BBG the other day for porn.com. the 16x9 worked fine for that. the issue for me with 16x9 is lighting and dressing the rest of the set :) no big deal, just a bit more work... but worth it in the long run...

Grapesoda 05-25-2008 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcop (Post 14235407)
How about we black out a bit of either end of the 16:9 frame to make a 3:2 frame, just like the 35mm aspect ratio? That way it's closer to 4:3, but adds a little width, and it's a ratio that the eye is used to. We can call it the "Porn Ratio" and create our very own technical specs for it.

just protect that area with marks on the lcd and black it out in post!

marcop 05-25-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235435)
just protect that area with marks on the lcd and black it out in post!

Yeah, nothing to it.

RedShoe 05-25-2008 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcop (Post 14235397)
Me too. Whoever came up with that aspect ratio wasn't a porn fan. We need to come up with a porn aspect ratio closer to 4:3, which worked really well for shooting all sexual positions. There's way too much wasted space when shooting most porn activity. I've come to the conclusion that shooting porn in HD is merely a marketing gimmick. Anyone else feel that way?

I couldn't agree more.

Some guys drop $800 on a shitty HD and still sell it as HD, then render it back down to WMV.

marcop 05-26-2008 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedShoe (Post 14235630)

Some guys drop $800 on a shitty HD and still sell it as HD, then render it back down to WMV.

Yeah, I did!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

pornguy 05-26-2008 11:57 AM

Cute girl, but not my style.

Scott McD 05-26-2008 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 14235227)

Very nice indeed !!!!!! :thumbsup

woj 05-26-2008 12:36 PM

cute :thumbsup

CaptainHowdy 05-26-2008 02:12 PM

Really cute... almost girlfriend material!

carol.prime 05-26-2008 02:21 PM

Nubiles. net always rocks!! :thumbsup

ProjectNaked 05-26-2008 05:53 PM

Hmmm.... I'm totally on the fence here.







Add a red dildo to the shoot and I'd hit it :thumbsup

qxm 05-26-2008 05:55 PM

very tappable ass! ... lol

viencarl 05-27-2008 04:15 AM

she looks really cute :):):)

OG LennyT 05-27-2008 04:56 AM

I love that ass

MistressNirvana 05-27-2008 05:08 AM

The quality of the photo is just great , tho maybe her cellulite could be photoshoped and the lines on her stomach . But yes a great ass ;) .

emac 05-27-2008 05:11 AM

4:3 or 16:9 as long as they're cute like this - id hit it :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123