GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Topbucks injunction and settlement, what to do??? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=823937)

sortie 04-23-2008 06:25 PM

Topbucks injunction and settlement, what to do???
 
Did any of you get the email from Topbucks about the court injunction?

I got one and wow....I'm kind of lost about it.

I mean, I don't know about signing an injunction that had nothing to do with me.
That seems like I'm volunteering to include myself in a case that has nothing to
do with me.

I think I will need a lawyer just to figure out if signing it somehow makes me liable
if another affiliate does something stupid.

I wasn't aware that I was a "party" in any action and I never heard of a
"non-party" signing an injucntion.

I can see signing a contract with Topbucks agreeing not to spam, but I need more input
about signing anything else.

notoldschool 04-23-2008 06:32 PM

i feel ya. Im curios to hear what some of the legal minds have to say.

Furious_Male 04-23-2008 06:42 PM

I just receive it as well. I haven't had a chance to look into it yet. It appears that we have to agree to specific terms in regards to Can Spam however the way its worded is a bit confusing for those of us that don't speak legal talk.

Quote:

As you know, the TopBucks Webmaster Program was recently the subject of a settlement agreement between Cyberheat, Inc. and the Federal Trade Commission. Pursuant to the Injunction which resulted from the settlement agreement, TopBucks is required to obtain certain information from you, serve you with a copy of the injunction Order, and obtain your signed Acknowledgment of the Order. In shorter terms, your signature on the Acknowledgment verifies that you have read the Order and you agree to comply with the Order,
the Adult Labeling Rule, and the CAN-SPAM Act.

sortie 04-23-2008 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furious_Male (Post 14104888)
I just receive it as well. I haven't had a chance to look into it yet. It appears that we have to agree to specific terms in regards to Can Spam however the way its worded is a bit confusing for those of us that don't speak legal talk.

I have no problem obeying the Can Spam but signing the injunction seems wierd.

It only takes one webmaster to commit an act and violate the injuction and the
"major party" then becomes liable. I don't want to make myself part of the
"major party".

Sly 04-23-2008 06:47 PM

I was thinking it's more like an agreement stating that you will not violate those terms as an affiliate... my take was the FTC wanted every affiliate making that statement.

sortie 04-23-2008 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 14104907)
I was thinking it's more like an agreement stating that you will not violate those terms as an affiliate... my take was the FTC wanted every affiliate making that statement.

Every affiliate already made a statement not to spam when they agreed to TB's terms
of service. An injunction implies that someone spammed and is now agreeing to a court
order to stop. I never spammed so the court order is not directed at me so why should
I sign it like I spammed and agree to quit?

Seems to me that the affiliates who spammed should be getting the court order and
signing it and not me.

halfpint 04-23-2008 08:37 PM

Yep i got one to

I think its all about agreeing to this

"In shorter terms, your signature on the Acknowledgment verifies that you have read the Order and you agree to comply with the Order,
the Adult Labeling Rule, and the CAN-SPAM Act. Because TopBucks prohibits solicited or unsolicited email campaigns, compliance with the Order should be basically a non-issue to you."

So I guess if you dont use spam email you should be ok. Im not to sure what the adult labeling rule means though, unless it means having a warning page.

spacedog 04-23-2008 08:37 PM

25 page injunction
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/05230...forperminj.pdf

spacedog 04-23-2008 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 14105186)
Yep i got one to

I think its all about agreeing to this

"In shorter terms, your signature on the Acknowledgment verifies that you have read the Order and you agree to comply with the Order,
the Adult Labeling Rule, and the CAN-SPAM Act. Because TopBucks prohibits solicited or unsolicited email campaigns, compliance with the Order should be basically a non-issue to you."

So I guess if you dont use spam email you should be ok. Im not to sure what the adult labeling rule means though, unless it means having a warning page.

16 CFR 316.4 is the adult labelling law which states all emails containing adult content must be labelled "SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT" in the subject heading


Info on that
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...16cfr316.4.pdf

halfpint 04-23-2008 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 14105192)
16 CFR 316.4 is the adult labelling law which states all emails containing adult content must be labelled "Sexually Explicit"

Thanks, I dont use email campaigns thats why I wasent sure what it meant

sortie 04-23-2008 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 14105186)
Yep i got one to

I think its all about agreeing to this

"In shorter terms, your signature on the Acknowledgment verifies that you have read the Order and you agree to comply with the Order,
the Adult Labeling Rule, and the CAN-SPAM Act. Because TopBucks prohibits solicited or unsolicited email campaigns, compliance with the Order should be basically a non-issue to you."

So I guess if you dont use spam email you should be ok. Im not to sure what the adult labeling rule means though, unless it means having a warning page.

I'm not eager to sign something that I have to "guess" about.

Rochard 04-23-2008 08:53 PM

Our government really is clueless, isn't it?

Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

halfpint 04-23-2008 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14105218)
Our government really is clueless, isn't it?

Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

You want to see what the uk goverment wants to do with lap dancing clubs over here as they are classed as exploiting women

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programme...ht/7362673.stm

halfpint 04-23-2008 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 14105216)
I'm not eager to sign something that I have to "guess" about.

Yep I understand where you are coming from. I havent signed it yet either even though I dont use email as a promotion tool

baddog 04-23-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14105218)
Our government really is clueless, isn't it?

Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

No, it sounds like the government doesn't want any excuses that someone "did not know" that they could not mail.

dennisthemenace 04-24-2008 01:12 AM

Isn't part of the signing up process already agreeing not to spam as covered by the TOS?

sandman! 04-24-2008 01:18 AM

good luck getting people to sign.

i dont mail never have but i wont be signing shit.

does not matter tho i dont remember when the last time i sent them any sales was

LOL

JFK 04-24-2008 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dennisthemenace (Post 14105733)
Isn't part of the signing up process already agreeing not to spam as covered by the TOS?

yup, but I guess the gov wants to make sure , you fully understand about spamming . So they can come down hard, if you violate the terms:2 cents:

DigitalPimp 04-24-2008 01:27 AM

I seem to remember something about payment delays if one did not sign it.

polish_aristocrat 04-24-2008 01:33 AM

I didnt get any email about it probably because my email that I used for TopBucks is no longer working, but... when I want to check stats it asks me to agree with that....

Fabien 04-24-2008 04:32 AM

I got it also.

After 11 years online all i have to say is
FUCK IT !!!!

If it can't work it out without signing up this thingo,
Chow baby :winkwink:
Same goes for web hosts asking to signup something and fax it back.

cherrylula 04-24-2008 05:11 AM

holy shit

sign my ass

Fletch XXX 04-24-2008 05:16 AM

me no like this type of stuff and i do not like my name and signature being "sent to the government" via a xxx corp injunction

cherrylula 04-24-2008 05:17 AM

what the hell is the Adult Labeling Rule????

Pics Traffic 04-24-2008 05:18 AM

Got it too, but Im not signing shit.

Fletch XXX 04-24-2008 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14105271)
No, it sounds like the government doesn't want any excuses that someone "did not know" that they could not mail.

the "i didnt know" excuse never works in court, and I doubt that is why they are doing this.

Once a law is passed (spam laws have been for awhile now) you cannot get off by using "i didnt know."

Signing something to prove you are aware of something is somewhat reaching when it comes to being made aware of laws or legislation...

james_clickmemedia 04-24-2008 05:26 AM

Don't sign anything with seeking legal advice first. That's what I will do & if advised not to sign I won't...

Linkster 04-24-2008 05:37 AM

The only part that bothers me aside from being automatically included in an injunction without prior knowledge or notification - is the fact that one of the requirements is for Topbucks to provide all of your personal info and a record of all payments (including all bank details) sent to you - and that you agree to provide that info as part of signing this - but then the US Govt has always been good about protecting those databases of combined info like that - NOT!

I guess Ill just chalk up the outstanding payments as a loss and move on to another sponsor

RTP 04-24-2008 05:48 AM

Really this seems very straight forward and they address it in the letter even...

"Because TopBucks prohibits solicited or unsolicited email campaigns, compliance with the Order should be basically a non-issue to you."

It doesn't seem they are requesting anything additional or changing any terms in any way. If I am reading correctly, they settled and as part of the agreement were forced to send this out.

:2 cents:

CDSmith 04-24-2008 05:49 AM

Aside from the dreaded "objectionable signing requirement" thing, I'd like to take this moment to point out what pieces of shit the spammers themselves are. Those affiliates who flout the rules and break laws and piss off the world and the adult industry for their own short-term gain are a cancer in life and on the internet.

Those of you spamming assholes out there who caused this I give you a hail and hearty :321GFY

RTP 04-24-2008 05:52 AM

also....

"Cyberheat, Inc. fought hard to protect your privacy; therefore, the only information that will be forwarded to the government will be your signed Acknowledgment of the Order. All other personal information provided in the TB admin, will not be forwarded to the government, unless you violate the terms of the Injunction as they apply to you."

pornguy 04-24-2008 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14105218)
Our government really is clueless, isn't it?

Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

Sounds about right. But im sure someone like Ma - - - X will pop up and give it to them.

cranki 04-24-2008 06:00 AM

aren't online signatures worthless anyway?

pornguy 04-24-2008 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cranki (Post 14106156)
aren't online signatures worthless anyway?

Ever heard of the digital signature act.

I dont think that it has ever been enforced, but by typing your name to the contract, it is digitally signed, and accepted as real.

fatbaby 04-24-2008 06:08 AM

If you 'provide' the Government with "the only information that will be forwarded to the government will be your signed Acknowledgment of the Order".... ie: my name.. I'm pretty sure those fuckers could figure out who I am, and where I am.... um... no thanks!

tranza 04-24-2008 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14105218)
Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

That's EXACTLY the same feeling I got.

I wonder if I have to sign that injunction too, even though I'm not in the US.

:helpme

Trax 04-24-2008 06:28 AM

Why should I sign that? Seems very wrong...

sortie 04-24-2008 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RTP (Post 14106126)
Really this seems very straight forward and they address it in the letter even...

"Because TopBucks prohibits solicited or unsolicited email campaigns, compliance with the Order should be basically a non-issue to you."

It doesn't seem they are requesting anything additional or changing any terms in any way. If I am reading correctly, they settled and as part of the agreement were forced to send this out.

:2 cents:

Oh, I'm pretty sure that 99% of all webmasters are in compliance without doing anything.
It's the whole thing about signing something that looks like a court procedure that I
had nothing to do with. I didn't agree to shit. :1orglaugh

I don't know the fine print, I might have to blow Dick Chenney if another affiliate spams.

Allison 04-24-2008 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 14104907)
I was thinking it's more like an agreement stating that you will not violate those terms as an affiliate... my take was the FTC wanted every affiliate making that statement.

Yes, thank you. It's very simple. We are required to inform you that if there is a violation of CAN-SPAM (sending bulk email to promote our sites) by you, that there are specific measures we would take which include reporting your information to the FTC.

TopBucks does not allow the use of e-mail marketing to promote our sites and we have not for several years so this is really a non-issue since none of our webmasters use e-mail marketing to promote our sites.

~Alli

CDSmith 04-24-2008 09:16 AM

Reads to me like you are merely acknowledging the rules and agreeing to follow them, like a re-affirmation of their TOS.

No biggie, I signed it.

BradM 04-24-2008 09:18 AM

I won't be signing shit. I've never sent them a hit with my account - never got around to it. I don't have any part in this and want nothing to do with it. Not going to include myself in some government DB somewhere and when coming back from intl travel have my name come up as a smut peddler or something.

Why 04-24-2008 10:38 AM

and soulcash won the same fucking lawsuit... hahaha. topbucks shouldnt have dropped their council.

Allison 04-24-2008 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 14107133)
Reads to me like you are merely acknowledging the rules and agreeing to follow them, like a re-affirmation of their TOS.

No biggie, I signed it.

Yes and accourding to our records, the majority of webmasters are signing it as they realize the same thing.

~Alli

Allison 04-24-2008 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 14107462)
and soulcash won the same fucking lawsuit... hahaha. topbucks shouldnt have dropped their council.

Umm, isn't soulcash out of business? http://www.soulcash.com The website declined to show this webpage

Like the 4 other companies before us (Bangbros, Pimproll, adultpaymaster, adultplayersclub), we made the business decision to settle as it was in best interest for our webmasters, our company, and our employees. Additionally, we negotiated even more privacy protection.

~Alli

boneprone 04-24-2008 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 14105218)
Our government really is clueless, isn't it?

Seems to me like they want a list of ponographers....

Im glad im not the only one who thought this the moment I heard of it.

Anal Hobbit 04-24-2008 10:59 AM

Hey, if I dont sign it can I still spam?

evildick 04-24-2008 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 14107462)
and soulcash won the same fucking lawsuit... hahaha. topbucks shouldnt have dropped their council.

Won the lawsuit at what cost?

Basically he lost his whole program and left tons of people unpaid.

Allison 04-24-2008 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boneprone (Post 14107547)
Im glad im not the only one who thought this the moment I heard of it.

Well, they are not getting that from us. They may already have that from the 4 other companies who allow for all their records to be reviewed and copied.

~Alli

V_RocKs 04-24-2008 11:15 AM

I don't see anywhere that I am supposed to sign something and send it back.

I see nothing in my admin about this Injunction.

You stated in your Email that you made it really easy and yet none of us have a fucking clue what you are talking about.

So how about spelling it out here. What fucking buttons do I click to get to this fucking thing?

V_RocKs 04-24-2008 11:19 AM

OK... now it shows in my admin.. I received this Email yesterday and it didn't then.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123