LA Man Charged With Obscenity And 2257 Violations
 

Damn, i ordered all my scat flicks there. Anybody know another provider?

He's screwed

thats scurry lawds mercy

So he was shipping scat movies through the US Postal Service?

Why the fuck do they care so much about this stuff?
Yeah, scat movies are gross and filthy and disturbing but if people like me and Boyalley like that stuff then so fucking what? Nobody is hurt and no damage is done while shooting or watching these kind of movies. I dont get it. Why dont they spend their time and energy on more important things like cutting of Russia from the internet.

Funny thing is someone has to review all those movies hehe. Do they play that shit in court as well?

I must be way behind the times..i don't even know what a Scat is

Any update on the Max Hardcore case?

Its poo.

http://www.venusian.com/picture_libr...Scat_Girls.jpg

Now you know. Happy?

ick did you HAVE to post a picture? gross.

Somebody must buy it.

:(

yuk...........

They got him on the Obscenity, the 2257 was thrown in like a cherry on top of the sundae. They can say we will go after mainstream porn but they know they cant get a conviction so they go after the extreme stuff.

Take the easy targets down first and establish some precedents.

:2 cents:

It really doesnt set a precedent for going after mainstream.How do you jump from a girl shitting in some guys mouth to a couple having vanilla sex on a bed? That's a very long leap.

I *was* eating lunch. :disgust

one of the gfy admins should probably remove that obscene image from this thread

would be a shame if gfy got indicted for publishing obscene material :2 cents:

That shit is gross, but Dirty ass Frank has a point. Who cares if someone's into it and they watch the "shit" at home? Why should the government decide what should turn people on as long as no crimes have been commited?

The U.S. government has just passed a new law making it illegal to deficate. They consider it to be obscene and any person caught doing it will be jailed.


(just because some people are interested in a repulsive but natural process should "the government" have the power to run their lives??)

thats one gross niche

Was it arctic log?

Scat and watersports is a pretty easy target for obscenity charges, because it is pretty easy to find 12 jurors to put in a box that would be disgusted watching some girl eat a guy's shit.

It would also be pretty easy to get 12 jurors to find a guy urinating into a girl's mouth as pretty disgusting as well.

I personally don't have a problem with those things being considered obscene.

anyone want to go get some chocolate?

Sigh this is a subject im very well versed in. Here is a link to 2 news stories they just ran on our case click the link and then on the right scroll down till you see the 2 stories and listen to what they are saying and Larry Walters response.

http://www.weartv.com/players/news/t...es/video.shtml

You don't have a problem with it? It's a pretty slippery slope. Let's think of some other things that might be considered obscene by 12 jurors...

bukkake
gangbangs
double anal
huge objects
anal stretching (goatse style)
double penetrations (especially things like double anal)
asslicking
etc.

It's dangerous when people forbid things other consenting adults do just because they don't want to watch them :2 cents:

The main charge is from the obscenity angle - 2257 is just a substantive "tack on" charge.

Can I be excused from jury duty and not have to watch that shit? :winkwink:

I'll second that. Even though its chocolate, but still.

Your case in not the same, scat has been considered obscene for a long long time. This isnt something new.People want to make the big taboo(scat,beastality,rape) money got to be prepared to do the time. This isnt the first scat arrest, with scat there is nothing grey.

double post oops

How can I say this? The nature of democracy isn't absolute and unlimited freedom. US law has created a thing called "obscenity" and the courts and such have come down to using a "community standard" test to judge if something is obscene or not.

50 years ago, playboy magazine was all but obscene, and that was the version with just cleavage and legs. Now you get more exposure in a Cosmo magazine. Times change and things move.

Over the last 35 years or so, much of what would have been oscene (including deep throating) has become generally accepted by modern society. As time goes on, more and more becomes acceptable, the public becomes desensitized, and more and more things become mainstream.

A couple of years ago some guy did an interview on CNN wearing a T-shirt that said "GOATSE" on it, they apparently didn't know what it meant.

At some point, when a line is drawn, everything on THIS side of the line by nature will be considered acceptable, and that would help to make our businesses more legitimate. Shit out, cumshots in, watersports out, anal sex in, etc. Draw a line somewhere, and the risk factors in porn would drop dramatically.

Without some sort of judgement one way or the other, we are all flying blind because nobody knows where the line is.

Imagine they take him to court and they find him not guilty. All of a sudden, everything up to and including scat is no longer obscene. Par-tay!

I would hate to be the test case, but the judgement is important.

Ask the Republican board members. It'll be tough though, they tend to stay far away from these kind of threads.

Ron Paul is your answer to all your 2257 problems....PERIOD

I'm pretty sure they have but people away for scat. Scat also isnt just obscene its very unhealthy.

not really

if the guy is in Los Angeles, this is gonna go to the 9th circuit which has turned over tons of obscenity charges.

Ron Paul is the answer to the question nobody is asking. :error

I guess people are asking the wrong questions. :2 cents:

quick, someone post a link to 'doo doo brown' by two hyped brothers and a dog