GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hosted Galleries R.I.P? (2257) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=723019)

Nardimus 04-10-2007 08:12 PM
Hosted Galleries R.I.P? (2257)
 
just read this, what do you guys think?
http://ounique.com/site/HostedGalleries.htm

Quote:
As the new 2257 legislation is scheduled to go into effect, we have been asked by many clients whether or not webmasters' use of hosted galleries would be legal.
While we are not attorneys and do not give legal advice, it is our own understanding that while nothing in the new legislation specifically prevents the use of Hosted Galleries, the record keeping requirements may make them a thing of the past.

The proposed legislation appears to have three requirements that may make the use of hosted galleries logistically infeasible.

It seems the spirit of the legislation requires ALL webmasters to keep model releases and IDs on ALL models used in the images displayed on their sites. It does not make any exception for those using hosted galleries.
Each webmaster must be able to match the documents to each image in the hosted galleries.
The proposal for the new legislation also states, "Web pages appear to have an average life of only 100 days, and Web addresses disappear and change to such an extent that a permanent record of the depiction and its temporary locations (URL) are required." Thus every time the location of the content on a hosted gallery changes, the webmaster will need to update their 2257 records to accurately record the date and location of each image on every page of the hosted gallery.

jact 04-10-2007 08:16 PM
When did 2257 ever require you to keep records for things outside of your own website? Do they even understand the term hosted gallery?

mikeyddddd 04-10-2007 08:27 PM
On the contrary. Hosted galleries will be more prominent as many programs will not give affiliates the 2257 doc to use on their own galleries using the sponsors' content.

sicone 04-10-2007 08:31 PM
whoever wrote that is a few bricks short of a wall. Sad that so many people are incapable of reading and deciphering what the law really says.

PSSuperstars 04-10-2007 08:32 PM
Ounique is responsible for keeping track of every domain with its pics on it..

So..

If a person is uploading their content... that may be in the header of a gallery or something..
To a hosted gallery...

Ounique has NO way of knowing where its going or what the URL is..

It really makes things a crapshoot..

So that's what they're getting at..

I'm actually having to pull alot of my blog content.. because every category and archives is a NEW URL for the pics..

Lotsa little nitpicking things in the new 4472 that's fucking alot of us...

Barefootsies 04-10-2007 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sicone (Post 12233977)
whoever wrote that is a few bricks short of a wall. Sad that so many people are incapable of reading and deciphering what the law really says.
Correct.

:2 cents:

BoyAlley 04-10-2007 09:08 PM
WTF? I think they mean to be talking about submitted galleries, and not hosted galleries maybe?

Actually, I have no idea what in the hell they're talking about, and I don't think they do either. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

potter 04-10-2007 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyddddd (Post 12233966)
On the contrary. Hosted galleries will be more prominent as many programs will not give affiliates the 2257 doc to use on their own galleries using the sponsors' content.
X2........

spacedog 04-10-2007 09:42 PM
They're retarded.

Their webmasters don't need docs if they're using text links to the FHG.

WTF are they talking about.. every time the content on the FHG changes??

Since when do programs go changing the content in a FHG?

WTF is the government talking about.. average website life of 100 days, lol

GAMEFINEST 04-10-2007 09:46 PM
huh whaaa

Pleasurepays 04-10-2007 09:57 PM
gfy is always comedy.

haha.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

pussyluver 04-10-2007 09:59 PM
To early to say...
http://avn.com/index.php?Primary_Nav...tent_ID=286377

pussyluver 04-10-2007 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 12234143)
WTF are they talking about.. every time the content on the FHG changes??

Since when do programs go changing the content in a FHG?
Do you check to see if a sponsor changes their FHGs?

GatorB 04-10-2007 10:13 PM
Did a bunch of retarded monkeys write that? Most sponsors with hosted galleries have 2257 info on them NOW. This new law doesn't change that. So why would sponsors drop them? If anything they'd drop giving out free content as that WOULD in fact require them to hand out 2257 docs.

Nardimus 04-10-2007 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyddddd (Post 12233966)
On the contrary. Hosted galleries will be more prominent as many programs will not give affiliates the 2257 doc to use on their own galleries using the sponsors' content.
i thought the same thing... that seems like what will happen... and in this case of hosted galleries being more prominent....

will we see "johnny webmaster" disappear? I'm talking about the guys who build and submit their own galleries.

Will the only ones be left standing tgp/mgp site owners and the programs themselves?

spacedog 04-10-2007 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pussyluver (Post 12234219)
Do you check to see if a sponsor changes their FHGs?
apparently the monkeys that wrote that moronic shit change their galleries all the time, but most sponsors don't change the content on the FHG at all once it's created.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123