![]() |
The solution to your 2257 problems....
Well when I heared about the 2257 upcoming regulations 2 years ago I decided to move to a different country, that was the easy solution....
but the other solution is to have a 3rd party company that sponsors will give IDs to and this company can charge a monthly fee of like $30/month from each webmaster and provide 2257 records for all scenes from major sponsors + 24/7/365 phone support for emergencies etc etc..... please give me free service if anyone uses my idea. |
How about if you try reading the law first then offer suggestions that are not in direct violation of the law?
That would be my suggestion to you. |
Quote:
|
I love this thread already. :1orglaugh
|
And here we go...
|
Quote:
If it was that easy it would have been done. |
hmmmm...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Whatever you say, sheep. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Foolish? I'm the guy who has been trying to beat 2257 compliance into all of the ignorant fucks around here for years. The foolish people are those who were not prepared for the worst. |
Quote:
However, that isn't what this is about. Your reply to Oracle Porn was condescending. It was also ignorant. I think you should apologize to him. |
I wouldn't be surprised if those who have been beating compliance into us for so long are also not compliant!
|
Quote:
LittleLupa.com - holy fucking bat shit. :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
How was it ignorant?? The law CLEARLY states records must be maintained at YOUR place of business, which means you can't have a 3rd party store them for you... |
Quote:
"You can hire a company to keep your 2257 records, and we will consider that your place of business." I have not heard a single attorney refute that. I would love one of the industry lawyers to make a definitive statement one way or the other. However, the 3 that I have spoken with have all said the same thing. The FBI has gone on record with that statement and THEY have heard nothing to refute it either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hey retard, don't quit your dayjob. |
Quote:
My understanding is that the listed custodian of records is legally responsible for the 2257 docs. So if some 3rd party started becoming custodian for a bunch of different people, if ANY of them have records that aren't accurate (maybe the client puts up content and doesn't add the URLs to the database for example), the custodian could face the 5 years in jail. Do you think ANY attorney or firm is going to take legal responsibility and put their freedom on the line like that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They can't be unless they willingly take on that responsibility, and although an attorney would need to verify this as I'm not 100% sure, the way I read it is that the listed Custodian Of Record indeed takes on that burden. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
bumpage for the morning crowd
|
Bump. Any updates for this thread?
|
fuck it, start a tube site in sweden and give all your content to a user to submit. no 2257 necessary. walla.
|
Quote:
|
man I would gladly pay $250 a month for a service like that all day long.
|
Move to Ohio, TN, or Kentucky, at least it's safe for now.
|
well you do tht now
|
Who bumped this??
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
NosMo |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123