![]() |
Alec Helmly personally Supports .XXX
Efforts to get a statement directly from him on the xbiz boards back this up.
Basic Rules of GFY 1. No spamming other boards! We don't spam other boards about GFY. We need the same courtesy! Now we know why he is buddy buddy with Lawley...wanna bet theres money involved? |
Quote:
hate the game buddy |
I do hate the game specially when people are playin it with my life and my money.
|
Quote:
|
I dunno, I kinda think that if XBiz is in ICMRs pocket...that's relevant. Specially when XBiz is falling all over themselves to APPEAR to be against .XXX
Can you say Agent Provacateur? |
bump u up
|
Aren't A) spreading a false accusation, and B) posting links to another board BOTH bannable offenses here on GFY?
|
if the link is an offense I apologize and am fine with a mod removing it but as far as a false accusation....the fact is that alec refuses to answer personally and from what I see it seems obvious that he supports .XXX which is FINE by me...but he should at least have the balls to say he supports it.
|
read the GFY rules, I do
|
Don't know who supports what, but looking at that thread there, it's obvious that .xxx is perceived in a better way at the Xbiz board than it is on GFY.
|
Quote:
The lack of any response from Helmy is no surprise - it must be a very difficult to give a "Yes" or "No" answer when money is at stake.... |
Quote:
Oddly, Alec reminds me of FoxNews :winkwink: |
Quote:
Fuck .XXX, fuck Lawley, but this "calling people out" bullshit is EXACTLY what divides the industry and makes things like .XXX possible. |
Quote:
If someone comes into the other place spouting off nonsense backed up by a cheering section of one-post-wonders, it doesn't have as much of an impact. Just how we roll, I guess. |
Quote:
Or even Yes I do. |
Quote:
|
P.S., I'm going to go for a run and then hop in the shower. I won't be back to this thread, you can beat your dead horse in peace. Get a bigger stick, though, it's more amusing to watch.
|
Quote:
If everyone was against .xxx and everyone voiced their opinion and said clearly that he is against, then .xxx wouldn't happen. What could make .xxx possible (personally I still think it will be rejected rather than approved) would be when some people (I don't know who) are silently supporting it as it is apparently the case now... and it looked to me like MikeSouth asked for a clarification that everyone from Xbiz is strongly opposed to .xxx (if EVERYONE in this biz viewed .xxx in the same way like the US looks at terrorists then everyone would be happy to admit that they are a part of the "War against .xxx" - in which you are either "with us" or "against us" ) thats just some logic here, but I can't comment on the personal aspects since I don't know the people in question on such level. edit: Quote:
|
Quote:
Only my :2 cents: but also see a "contest" there and an attempt at arrogance with the assumption "we know best" coupled with a strong desire to lead the whole industry *somewhere*. Why do I think XBiz exists for Alec and as a "tool" to portay a face of "righteousness" - along with several other things where he has a finger in the pie? There is nothing wrong with many of these "projects" - in fact, can be the reverse - but coming from a guy in the porn biz, exudes an aura of someone trying to be something they are not. Can't help but think Lawley and Helmy would make and handsome couple and hot bedmates - they both have similar motivation factors and playing a role as instigators, accompanied by the usual assumptions of being relevant to the adult industry - and with, of course, the industry's welfare in mind. Who could resist this charming couple? :pimp |
gee edgeprod you sure are defensive...reckon why? Did we hit a sore spot maybe??
I bet if you followed this to its end...youd find money in the hands of XBiz. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As a side note, I know some of the people behind the .xxx deal (which was a done deal two years ago) – but that info did NOT come from anyone at XBIZ. If I told you the names and details I have heard, then you'd really have a shit for yourself... It's the names I've heard, BTW, that make me believe that .xxx is inevitable – and if you're smart, you'll be thinking about how you'll respond when it comes – not waste your time pointing and whining about things you know nothing about. |
I dunno about Y'all but my BULLSHIT detector just redlined.
|
Quote:
No-one in this industry can seriously believe XXX will do anything to exclude minors from porn sites. No-one can welcome the possibility, however remote they may perceive it to be, that we might one day be ghettoized. There isn't s single, solitary benefit to be gained from XXX except by those involved directly with the would-be registrar or who plan to speculate in the domain names the TLD will allow. Even this latter group would do well to see past their anticipated short-term gains and consider that they are helping put potential control over who does business and how, into the hands of someone who has cynically distorted his motives and intentions, to get this far. They are damn fools if they think that past acquaintance or present deals guarantee that in future they will not be in as much trouble as the rest of us, if our fears about XXX play out. |
even if they get it passed it wont mean shit. just another .whaterver whogivesashit.
|
Stephen:
So far... it took three posts - one to praise XBiz, one to imply Alec can be compared to a "leader" and the third to convey, "mind your own busineess - you are an idiot". In answer to each... (a) Fine.. agree. (b) Helmy is Helmy - he sure as hell is no leader. He was blessed with a mouth and like everyone else, can use it to say "Yes" or "No". (c) Suppose this is a demonstration of the arrogance in the "XBiz team" - of course you know better and others are all idiots. I never noticed baddog actually asking you for your opinion on whether Helmy supported .XXX TLD's or not Stephen - he asked Helmy, who obviously he is going thru a dumb phase and unable to respond. |
Quote:
As a side note, that re-shuffling might not change too much, since the same folks that were "big names" when I got into adult in '96 will be the same "big names" to profit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't you people have something more profitable to do with your time? |
Here's an idea: what if all of you that so streneously oppose .xxx don't buy any .xxx domains when they become available? Put your money where your mouth is and refuse to support this initiative ? after all, since this is just a money scam, what better way to thwart it than to not play along?
Oddly, I bet that the loudest squakers will be the first to pay up... |
Quote:
OK.. So Helmy needs a mouthpiece to speak for him? That's your burden. Obviously you having nothing more profitable to do than spend time here attempting to speak for your 'leader" - quit whining about others making comment and making pathetic attempts to decry them as being "idiots" and playing the role of drama queens. It's very easy Stephen - there is more than good reason to consider Helmy has his finger in the .XXX pie and his "personal views" are more relevant than any staff at XBiz. Your "leader" was asked for a two or three character response - nothing more, nothing less - but failed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"i have a meat torpedo in my pants."
~posted for Juicy D. Links (He couldn't make it and asked me to post this) |
also what is the link to cancel both my subscriptions, Stephen
|
Quote:
He didn't "fail" he provided a clear and specific response that I posted for him. This whole "issue" is the same as a telemarketer being pissed off because when he called at dinner time to sell some aluminum siding, he got hung up on... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And, yes, Alec is too busy; but even if he wasn't, why do you think he is obligated to respond to "demands"? What I don't understand is why all the focus on Helmy? I don't see demands that Joe, Ron, the folks behind the biggest cash contest currently running on this site, or anyone else what their stance is, yet, those folks (and others) are the ones you should be asking... We give you an opportunity to discuss the matter with the guy behind it all and we get to be the bad guys? |
Quote:
I guess I was wrong and I feel alittle sad actually. Also this .xxx coming back and reactions has shown me what a short sighted whore industry I work in. |
Quote:
There was NO "XBIZ demands that you move to .xxx and here's how!" It was just "Here's the two main players in the two main issues impacting us, let's hear what they have to say..." This is important stuff, whether you like it or not, and XBIZ is the only one bringing it to you, because, as you said, we're "the paper of record for the adult industry" – and now "the show of record for the adult industry." As far as ICANN goes, that's another story. They're not worried about what XBIZ is writing; they're worried about the Bush administration, the United Nations, all the family groups and everyone else that's against "legitimizing" porn by giving it its own TLD. As a side note, many of you bitch about the religious right trying to close you down, but they are dead set AGAINST .xxx – Have you ever considered the issue deep enough to wonder why your enemies don't want you to have it? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The question is "IF .xxx passes, then what next?" and "How do I respond / adapt / profit?" That's all we're trying to address, including the concerns over domain pecking orders (I believe that current dot-com owners have first rights for the .xxx version of their names), traffic redirection, and other ancillary factors that Lawley can sit in the hot seat over. You're a reasonable guy, Tony, I'd hope that you'd make it to the show and put in your questions / opinions. |
Quote:
xxx is total bullshit and is nothing but a way for a handful of people to fill their pockets. if it wasn't domains wouldn't be 75/piece. which makes no sense at all, do they just assume adult sites make more money than mainstream? give me a break. and protecting the kids, hahahaha. yeah, please protect the children but pay 10 times more per domain for no reason at all because of it. these guys are nothing but theives and selling out their own industry, cannibals. |
Alec is about to get a royal assreaming compliments of mikesouth.com
|
Quote:
We got a "friend" (not an employee, but someone who gets paid) to speak for an ass who can't speak for himself (Helmy) and who entertains another ass (Lawley) and gives him a platform to spew his irrelevant crap to an audience of those who actually pay for the privilege of listening to it. I thought some threads on GFY were pointless, but the concept of paying to listen to garbage from another greedy wannabee (and his friends) is something Xbiz and Helmy have excelled themselves in. Congratulations to all involved - you make good partners :pimp |
Quote:
What happened to freedom of speech? What happened to your ?no censorship? ideals? Or do these ideals only apply to you and your porn-peddling needs? Hypocrites! Seriously, what do you have to fear from listening to a service provider explain his wares? If you think that your position is so superior, you should welcome the opportunity to debate him ? not adopt the methods of the book-burners trying to squelch dissenting ideas. Beyond that, I believe that much of the furor has been caused by a misunderstanding of what the seminar is about. Whether or not you agree with a .xxx TLD, or have misgivings about its implementation, efficacy or expenses, it remains a very distinct possibility that despite the opposition of the U.S. Government, the United Nations, many family groups and indeed, many adult webmasters, that .xxx will be passed. If .xxx is passed, and I believe it will eventually be passed, it will have a profound impact on the online adult landscape. What then? How will you respond? Having a discussion on this subject is vital, in the same sense that fire drills are conducted in schools; just so everyone knows what to do in case the ?what if? scenario plays out. Businesspeople account for predictable contingencies; they develop mitigation plans and respond to the changing market conditions before them. For these planned measures to be effective, accurate intelligence needs to be amassed and questions need to be answered. XBIZ is providing a venue for those questions to be asked and information disseminated, allowing businesspeople to gain an advantage over the ostriches that would rather bury their heads in the sand. And that, in the end, is what this is all about: businesspeople gaining an advantage. I?ve said before that the have?s need to shed the have not?s if we?re to continue operating into the future, and this is one mechanism by which this process will progress. But regardless of the politics, patrons, publicity or possibilities of .xxx, it is a matter that professionals need to discuss ? whatever the outcome. Will you be part of that discussion, or will you be one of the kids making noise in the other room while the adults are trying to talk? |
Quote:
i'm not gonna get into all this, but the bush administration and everyone else knows that .xxx is not going to stop anything that lawley says it will. :) the only TLD that can even remotely help to keep kids off of adult sites is .kids any computer a child uses could be configured with software to only allow .kids domains to resolve. MONEY is the motivator here. Lets not forget that. ICANN likes money too. The issues arising here are because people feel that there are cogs turning behind the scenes, and they are. I myself talk to people who do know some of those that are going to fuck us if they can get this pushed through. Fortunately for them, they are smart enough to not give me the names or details because I wouldn't hesitate for one second to blow a hole in this thing bigger than the one that sank the Titanic. i do not intend to argue with anyone, I just want to make sure everyone stays aware, Stuart Lawley can give two shits about kids, and I just might tell him myself at the seminar. i personally do no think that xbiz is pro .xxx, if i did i wouldn't support them like i do. carry on all. :winkwink: :2 cents: |
Quote:
If anyone needs to be heard, it's Alec - not the messenger boy. At least Alec is in this industry which is more than can be said for the righteous Mr Lawley - the protector of the world's children - at a price. It's also not an issue of "this person not being allowed to speak" - let him pay for his own propaganda bullshit. Why should this industry enable him by entertaining his views and webmasters having to tolerate sitting thru his slippery money-making spewage disguised as a effort towards righteous aims of protecting children ad nausea? This whole issue is based on total hypocracy and greed - and that extends to those who associate with swamp life. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123