GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Are You On The DOJ's Newly Aquired 'Target' List? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=484259)

European Lee 06-23-2005 10:37 AM

Are You On The DOJ's Newly Aquired 'Target' List?
 
Its starting to sound like the FSC just handed the government a list of their members.

From this point on, that list is going to be called the 'known target list' :1orglaugh

Thanks guys :thumbsup

Regards,

Lee

Giorgio_Xo 06-23-2005 10:39 AM

Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass. :)

European Lee 06-23-2005 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass. :)

So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky :winkwink:

Regards,

Lee

dopeman 06-23-2005 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass. :)

so how do the feds know who they can or can't go after?

Giorgio_Xo 06-23-2005 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by European Lee
So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky :winkwink:

Regards,

Lee

All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor. The government could theoretically assemble a list by visiting each and every webmaster, but they don't have the resources to do so.

Giorgio_Xo 06-23-2005 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dopeman
so how do the feds know who they can or can't go after?

They don't.

tranza 06-23-2005 10:45 AM

That would piss off lot's of the big sponsors around...

dopeman 06-23-2005 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor. The government could theoretically assemble a list by visiting each and every webmaster, but they don't have the resources to do so.

have you read the specific deal they cut? not being a smart ass, but do you know something we don't about what the feds can or can't do right now?

BoogieCFZ 06-23-2005 10:53 AM

Not to go agree'ing with lee left and right here but...


yup.

:)

Mr.Fiction 06-23-2005 11:00 AM

If you write your legal expenses off on your taxes, the government already has that information.

The Bush administration is not Acacia. They have already shown they are willing to break laws to get what they want. I doubt they care about the FSC mailing list. :1orglaugh

Janet Reno 06-23-2005 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by European Lee
So how can the FSC give their members protection under this agreement they have made without the US government knowing WHO their members are? Think about it Sparky :winkwink:

Regards,

Lee

Which is why being a member will not protect you. If they succeed in getting a TRO, the laws will not be enforced for anyone, not just members of the FSC.

Mrs. Lenny2 06-23-2005 11:09 AM

acquired :upsidedow

Centurion 06-23-2005 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
Fake drama. It is a major violation of Federal law for FSC to hand over its member list to the DOJ. You are talking out of your ass. :)



Then how will the DOJ know if you are a member of the FSC coalition and free from prosecution then?

Centurion 06-23-2005 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
All a member would need to do is state membership at the moment of inspection. The DOJ is still free to inspect, they just can't act on it if the injunction is filed in favor.

No..they would NOT be able to "still inspect" under the injunction. Part of the injunction is "no unreasonable search and seizure."


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123