It's funny that Bush sticks his nose in other people's elections... the hypocrisy!
 

"Power is in the hands of an unelected few who have retained power through an electoral process that ignores the basic requirements of democracy," Bush said in a statement.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...election_dc_17

Can't wait to hear 12click's reply :1orglaugh

His statement reminds me of something.

:1orglaugh Talk about the fucking pot calling the kettle

:1orglaugh werd.

Stuart, you don't understand what makes light when you hit the wall switch. Are you sure you want to leap to elections?

HAHAHA I love 12clicks. But sometimes I think he is being serious.

That's what I was expecting... that's how you debate politics! Good stuff man :thumbsup

PS: I actually have taken electrical classes while attending college and done a lot of carpentry/electrical work while running a hunting lodge, so I figure politics is next logical step after figuring out how to get a light to turn on.

im speechless. jesus fucking christ, bush and his losers are a huge hypoctritic propaganda machine that needs to be stopped.
Europe and Russia need to unite their armies and put an end to him. Fight him with his own methods, its the best way.

democracy is only fun when someone you like wins the election I guess

Toy soldiers...Sarge's heroes..aaarggghh..

:1orglaugh too true

I still don't understand why that man hasn't been shot yet...

Anyone know John Hinckleys phone number? :BangBang:

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stuart, I debate with my equals, I ridicule the rabble.

sure you do :1orglaugh

good morning rabble

Damm what a great "comeback"....

that just made your day didnt it? :1orglaugh

Bump for the fellow that wants to watch shock and awe in european cities on live television.

:1orglaugh

i fixed it for u :upsidedow

One must go to a bowling alley to find people who "debate" in similar styles as yourself :upsidedow

you keep confusing debate with ridicule.

With you, they're one and the same since I've never seen you actually "debate" without calling someone an idiot, or "son" or some other kind of condesending statement.

It's pretty much the only way one can defend Bush, other than lying :upsidedow

Ever actually be physically near him?

I accidentally was.

I bathed with SOS pads for weeks after.

no stuart, with YOU they're one and the same because I refuse to do anything but ridicule you.

take your first post in this thread for example. It proves to anyone who reads it how uninformed (or uneducated) you are.

That explains all the replies... oh wait, they're all agreeing with me, except you.

And yes, I know your response will be to ridicule all of them as well.

It must be tough being the only person in the world educated enough to not see the obvious that's right in front of you.

Trust me, I'd rather the guy I was talking to keep better friends too. :1orglaugh

you see stuart, this is the trap of GFY that you've neatly fallen into.
believing you're right because a handful of half wits agree with you doesn't make you right. It is, however, the reason you jump from job to job in this biz.

jump from job to job? How many jobs have I had? Right, this is the first one. Oh wait, you'll reply "I don't know, I don't bother keeping track of you" despite that you're making an attempt to claim that you do while being terribly wrong.

By the way, thanks for doing exactly as I said you would... ridiculing everyone who's posted so far. Each of your replies has been exactly what I stated they would be.

You're far to predictable now. It's hardly even entertaining anymore.

You need to come up with some fresh stuff or something.

oh, ok. I'll play along and pretend you didn't fail with your own stuff and take a job.
:winkwink:

Doing my own thing and taking a job is the same as going from job to job? What world do you live in?
And I didn't fail at doing it, the truth is that I reached a breaking point as I was making more money than I ever had before. So I guess you could say I was doing TOO WELL.
And yes, that in conjunction with other factors broke me down and I had to pick up and just start over from scratch and figure out what really matters in my life.

So let me get this straight then.. you accuse me of going from job to job, THEN retract that to going from failing on my own to taking a job... and all of this is your big attempt at ridicule/debate about what Bush thinks about the elections in other nations?

Good stuff man, you're right on top of current affairs as much as you ever were. Lemme know when you ever manage to stop back peddling, making false claims, being wrong about said claims and then diverting attention from the topic at hand.

stewy, failure is failure no matter how you spin it.
not being able to keep up with the conversation is just another example of limitations.
we left Bush long ago. We're now onto the reasons you fail. reason one was the misguided concept that if the rabble backs you against me, you're right.

stuart, you're slowly sinking. I'm just ridiculing you before you entirely wink out of the business and I miss my chance. :1orglaugh

Sure there buddy... if you say so. Speaking of which... where'd you find this thread? Page 3? 4?
Did you bookmark it just to see what I might say in response to you?

Yup, I'm slowly sinking. I'll be out of the business due to failure within the month... oh woe is me :1orglaugh

yeah i cant wait until his last term is done

To get back on topic...

How many "world" leaders and "world" citizens stuck there noses in the last US election?

It happens.

You mean like an electoral system where the guy with LESS votes wins the election? You mean a system where unelected Supreme Court judges decide who wins an election? Something like that?

Revisionist history ROCKS!

son, as an EMPLOYER in this business, I know exactly how tenuous an employees job is. You can put on a brave face for the rabble, stewy, but please, between you and I, you're only fooling yourself.
You failed on your own, now you'll skate on someone else's dime until they wise up. :winkwink:


you like how I'm replying to this thread so far? :1orglaugh

So Bush didn't get LESS votes in 2000?

Hmmmm. You must have went to the same schools as Bush.

Gore 50,996,116
Bush 50,456,169

hahahaha, is this the latest version floating around moveon.org?

No -- I didn't go to Yale and Harvard...

but I imagine he got more EC votes (you know -- the votes that count...).

So really --

What does your point (or lack thereof) have to do with world leaders and citizens commenting on world elections?

Yup, I do like it, it's rather amusing, since you have no clue what my situation actually is.

Truth is, I'm still doing my own stuff, but I decided to work for nichepay for the steady paycheck for the sake of the baby that I'll be having next month.

as a former EMPLOYER, I too know what I am doing and how tenuous an employee's position is.

So what's your take on the Bush thing again? Oh right, no position.. just that I'm to be ridiculed. :1orglaugh

Now that is funny. Do you really think that the armies of any country could stop the US war machine? The first reaction would be standard fighting, then he would simply pull out the nukes. The US has the most, and would therefore have the most survivors.

PS. Dont give the idiot any ideas.

Stuart: Why do you bother? You'll never make a dent.

Because even though he'd never admit it... as pointless as it seems, I know that everyone who reads this sees him for as he is. I figure that makes it worth it :upsidedow

hope bush does more about Iran

like strap Stuart to a bomb going to Iran

English?

America would be knocked off the face of the earth if China, Russia, and Europe all went against them, don't kid yourself and think otherwise. China is already challenging US military supremacy. Russia actually still has more nukes than the US does, China and the EU also each have a couple hundred. The US is one country with 300 million people, Fox News aside they could not take on the entire would. Fighting Russia and China alone would devastate the country. With no allies they wouldn't have the capability to send troops overseas, but Brazil would be the first to side with Russia, China, and the EU. Canada probably would as well, eventually.

The US could launch a nuke attack, and then they'd get hit right back many times and we'd be in nuclear winter, every country involved would be ruined. Or, they could try to win with their air superiority, but they don't have the capability to sustain that for very long. It was recently released that China's war machine is much more advanced than anyone in the west realized, if they militarized there would be no stopping them.