![]() |
Bush Spends More on His Inauguration Than On Tsunami Disaster
so heres the breakdown - Spain is giving 68$ the largest donation with Canada second at 40$ - USA is a pitiful 35$ million when you take into account that Bush is spending 270$ MILLION on his Inauguration rather than the relief effort - thats a shitload more than his 2001 Inauguration which costed 40$ Million - which is still more than what America is giving today !!
Spain on Wednesday announced the largest single contribution - $68 million http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/041229/w122980.html Canada's government has pledged 40$ million (*NOTE: more than americans but you wont find CNN reporting we are giving more than USA) http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Stor...1-002/page.asp The United States is offering a total of $35 million, Japan with $30 million. Australia and Germany have now pledged $27 million, Saudi Arabia $10 million. http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/12/28/quake.aid/ WTF !!!! Bush Inauguration 270$ Million http://athenian.dailykos.com/story/2004/12/28/115750/09 |
why do you hate the US so much ;)
|
I dont hate americans.. just a cheap ass president who spends more on himself than relief effort on a disaster that caused over 120 million deaths and still growing.
Wonder what would happen if sept 11th, no one offered help to america because we were busy with a hockey game |
Quote:
|
UK is giving $100 million.
|
You'll even use the deaths of 135,000 people to bash a president you don't like? You sad, sad little shit.
|
I guess $35 million PLUS the 2 aircraft carriers loaded with supplies isn't good enough for you...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2...-tsunami_x.htm |
I'm pretty confident this won't be the only contribution the US will send, congress meets after the New Year and more money will be given. Take a look at the $$ the US sends to many countries worldwide for relief efforts compared to some countries. Where there is help needed the US is there. In fact the US is going over there now to access damage.
|
and you dont think hes going to spend that?? Im in canada and I can read the american papers where they are pissed he's going to use that money for himself
|
Quote:
...it is likely that Bush, who raised a record $270 million for his re-election, will surpass the $40 million spent on his first inauguration in 2001. |
Quote:
|
yet still to date, spain and canada has pledged more than the USA?? Does that make much sense??
|
The biggest contribution the US can provide is logistics. No country has greater sea and air resources. The battle groups becoming floating hospitals and bearing food, water and medicine with the helicopters to deliver them is a valuable contribution.
Much as I dislike Bush, his little post election victory party is not financed with government money but with private contributions. |
Quote:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=7213090 |
Quote:
No where in that article does it say that he's spending $270 million on his innauguration. Perhaps you should reread it again. |
Quote:
okay, that I can buy - and thanks for the clarification on private contributions - I just hope that america with all its boasting can step up and be the leader in this disaster http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...=1#post6236853 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I too get pissed when I donate money to someone and they use it. |
UK: $96m
Sweden: $75m Spain: $68m China: $60m France: $56m EU $44m Netherlands: $36m US: $35m Canada: $33m Japan: $30m Australia: $27m Switzerland: $23m Norway: $16.6m Denmark: $15.6m Saudi Arabia: $10m Taiwan: $5.1m Finland: $3.4m Kuwait: $2.1m UAE: $2m Source: Reuters, United Nations But anyway I think things will change as time goes on. I think the U.S will donate more, its still very early days. |
I really think the Gov is doing what it can at this point. There is no question there will be millions upon millions more given by the US Goverment before this is all said and done. You can also count on the US private or corp. sector to give HUGE amounts. Amazon.com for one has been raising 1 million dollars a day so far for the releif fund. All over US TV is companies organizing fund raisers and making long term comittments to ensuring that this is handled correctly.
My understanding is that Bush gave nearly cent that was in the emergency fund up front. He has to go to congress to get approval for amounts over what the emergancy fund holds. (heard it on CNN so cant say if its fact or not) However, I bet we are way over 200 million before the end of next week. I do see and underestand the frustrations. If we were not so commited in Iraq, we would have been more prepared fund this event. Instead, we are spending billions in a wasted effort to bring "democratic system" to a land that will NEVER adopted it. Im torn also, but you can count on the US as being the long term, heaviest contriburtor. We always have been and we always will be. |
Canada donates $40M, wipes out $1B in debt, and its citizens raise an additional 20M
Source: Reuters, United Nations is wrong or your quoting an old story. Please go over the lastest donations showing that canada has offered a shitload more, not to mention spain |
It doesn't matter how much they have givin, what counts is that they have givin something.
Who cares if one country gave more help than another , as along everyone helps. |
Quote:
I think it is very impressive that Canada and it's people did what they it did. |
World Bank: $250m
UK: $96m Sweden: $75m Spain: $68m China: $60m France: $56m EU $44m Netherlands: $36m US: $35m Canada: $33m Japan: $30m Australia: $27m Switzerland: $23m Norway: $16.6m Denmark: $15.6m Saudi Arabia: $10m Taiwan: $5.1m Finland: $3.4m Kuwait: $2.1m UAE: $2m |
well I think we all agree that america is one of the richest countries.. I mean how many billion are they spending on war now??
My hope as I said, is that Bush can offer more help than what he has, just seems that canada is ignored in the CNN report trying to make USA as the major contributor without mentioning they arent the top !! That is what really pissed me off this morning, that america attempts to always make itself look impressive by ommiting certain truths. Wouldnt have been so big of an announcement had CNN reported, American is behind canada in giving - now would it? |
Quote:
|
The point that's being lost in all these numbers flying is a more important number: 3
3 = The number of days before Bush took time from his vacation to address this horrible crisis. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
question should be is why does america always have to give more then any other country........ always? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
silly reasoning. it's about time other countries step up to the plate. |
Instead of bashing countries and presidents for what they're not doing. What are YOU doing to help?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
World Bank: $250m UK: $96m Sweden: $75m Spain: $68m China: $60m France: $56m EU $44m Netherlands: $36m US: $35m Canada: $33m Japan: $30m Australia: $27m Switzerland: $23m Norway: $16.6m Denmark: $15.6m Saudi Arabia: $10m Taiwan: $5.1m Finland: $3.4m Kuwait: $2.1m UAE: $2m |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
These countries are "pledging" money. Meanwhile, the US is already sending planes, ships, food, water, doctors, and medical supplies. It would be nice to put a price on this stuff but since a lot of it no one else even has (think canada) its hard to put a dollar value on what its worth. you kids sure do have a lot to learn. hopefully your still young. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unfortunately there are cities that havent been added to the total that will bring the number up past 400,000 I fear - the relief effort will have to be measured in billions rather than millions |
Quote:
good! it's about time. talk about catch 22. if america is #1 in things, we get bashed. if we aren't, we still get bashed. i like see others on top every once in a while. it's just sad that a situation like this had to occur for the tables to turn. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hopefully your young and in time might learn a bit |
oh, and to you half whits that think we'd spend more if we weren't spending so much on the war I'll say this:
Look at all the extra money the UN now has by not living up to its obligations in iraq and letting the US spend all its money there. The UN is now loaded with cash thanks to the US and can fund the relief without our money spent on iraq. |
Quote:
No son. I'm sure a couple of countries are priming the props of the one or two planes they'll send as we speak. Lucky for the victims, we've been there for days. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123