![]() |
Why is sending traffic directly to a paysite a bad idea?
Why is it bad. It seems so much easier and direct.
|
huh? But what kind of traffic?
|
TGP traffic for instance
|
I don't think it's a bad idea... what makes you think that?
|
because they are looking for free porn....
however if you can buy some good niche traffic from choker for example im sure you can send it directly to a paysite, im not sure if this is allowed tho. |
SE traffic send to a paysite tgp traffic send to a gallery
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Always use landing pages to control your traffic.
|
Quote:
|
I just read on GFY a lot that its a stupid thing do to and that conversions are 1:3000 as opposed the the usual 1:300 when you send it to a TGP then to a gallery then finaly to the site
|
1 in 300 that way? Ok. Whatever.
If you buy traffic from Choker ( and yes you can now buy for pay sites ) you get some pretty good traffic. |
Quote:
|
The less amount of clicks to the destinition the better. The best way to filter the traffic is to mirror the site tour and just link to the sponsor's join page. That way you have more control over the traffic.
|
Quote:
|
http://www.milfcruiser.com/?nats=MTE3OjU6Nw
will do OK with direct TGP traffic http://www.angelteen.com/ Will NOT do good. No offense to this site but it looks TOO much like a paysite. I am sure it does great with filtered traffic. |
It depends on the preview.
Most of my traffic is SE and gets mapped directly to the best sponsor preview, but I have found that if the previews are too brief, the surfer has not had a chance to get enthusiastic about the site and may not be ready to sign up so quickly. Brief previews are great to quickly sort out the buyers from the freeloaders, but I'm having better conversions by sending SE traffic directly to a longer and more generous previews. So far at least... :2 cents: -Dino |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123