GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How to END Terrorism!!!!!!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=360556)

Downtime 09-22-2004 08:16 PM

How to END Terrorism!!!!!!!!
 
Let me pose a thought, hopefully this can garner a decent discussion.


Terrorism lives through the media: TV cameras, newspapers, and the Internet. A terrorist's main objectives all circle around one central theme, which is getting their political message out to the public. Using TV cameras and now the Internet, they behead innocent people and hold hundreds of men, women, and children hostage in public schools. Terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive.

Think of it this way, in America, how does an average joe schmoe get his ass in the news? The reality is that it's nearly impossible; news stations want the juiciest, dirtiest, most moving, and most shocking material they can get their hands on. Joe Schmoe can't provide that. Terrorism can, on the other hand. This brings me to my final point.

Since the blood of terrorism flows through the media of it's host, could we, as the targets, simply ignore them entirely? Theoretically it would confuse the fuck out of them; they wouldn't know what to do. If we, from a media standpoint, worked together so that all our media outlets, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc, refused to air or even speak of any act of terrorism, wouldn't that stop it altogether? Note that our militaries would still be acting just as strong to kill them off; I only suggest cutting them off completely from a media standpoint.

Both Kerry and Bush believe strongly that terrorism will always be constant, that new terrorists will regroup and keep coming to replace the old ones. I whole-heartedly agree with both of them. What my argument does though, is provide a hope, at least in my mind, that terrorism can be defeated.

An argument isn't an argument unless you talk about the downfalls, however. This path would be extremely hard, especially at the start. Terrorism levels would probably PEAK as soon as they realized what our strategy was. I predict that peak because they'd basically be fighting for their own existence; since they feed of our media. If and when Al Jazeera becomes part of the ComCast basic cable package, I think this has a chance at working.

Hopefully this will get a good discussion going, and try to leave out the bipartisan shit; keep this thing focused.

Discuss!

Juicy D. Links 09-22-2004 08:17 PM

http://www.photo.net/photo/pcd0155/gay-parade-21.jpg

reynold 09-22-2004 08:19 PM

as if now i don't have any idea how terrorism can be stopped! how i wish there's a solution!

SmokeyTheBear 09-22-2004 08:22 PM

it's called a contolled media/communism . It doesn't work

SpikeHeel 09-22-2004 08:25 PM

to stop it, we must ignore it.. :BangBang:

Downtime 09-22-2004 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpikeHeel
to stop it, we must ignore it.. :BangBang:
only through the media, not from a military standpoint.

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
Let me pose a thought, hopefully this can garner a decent discussion.


Terrorism lives through the media: TV cameras, newspapers, and the Internet. A terrorist's main objectives all circle around one central theme, which is getting their political message out to the public. Using TV cameras and now the Internet, they behead innocent people and hold hundreds of men, women, and children hostage in public schools. Terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive.

Think of it this way, in America, how does an average joe schmoe get his ass in the news? The reality is that it's nearly impossible; news stations want the juiciest, dirtiest, most moving, and most shocking material they can get their hands on. Joe Schmoe can't provide that. Terrorism can, on the other hand. This brings me to my final point.

Since the blood of terrorism flows through the media of it's host, could we, as the targets, simply ignore them entirely? Theoretically it would confuse the fuck out of them; they wouldn't know what to do. If we, from a media standpoint, worked together so that all our media outlets, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc, refused to air or even speak of any act of terrorism, wouldn't that stop it altogether? Note that our militaries would still be acting just as strong to kill them off; I only suggest cutting them off completely from a media standpoint.

Both Kerry and Bush believe strongly that terrorism will always be constant, that new terrorists will regroup and keep coming to replace the old ones. I whole-heartedly agree with both of them. What my argument does though, is provide a hope, at least in my mind, that terrorism can be defeated.

An argument isn't an argument unless you talk about the downfalls, however. This path would be extremely hard, especially at the start. Terrorism levels would probably PEAK as soon as they realized what our strategy was. I predict that peak because they'd basically be fighting for their own existence; since they feed of our media. If and when Al Jazeera becomes part of the ComCast basic cable package, I think this has a chance at working.

Hopefully this will get a good discussion going, and try to leave out the bipartisan shit; keep this thing focused.

Discuss!

How about you just stop bombing and invading other countries?

That'd be a good start.

Downtime 09-22-2004 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
How about you just stop bombing and invading other countries?

That'd be a good start.

Did you even read what i wrote or did u just look at my sig?

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
Did you even read what i wrote or did u just look at my sig?
Yes I read what you wrote and it was idiotic.

If you want to stop terrorism, stop creating terrorists.

Downtime 09-22-2004 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Yes I read what you wrote and it was idiotic.

If you want to stop terrorism, stop creating terrorists.


Stop creating them? Care to explain?

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 08:40 PM

A better way......
http://www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/...rld/atomic.jpg

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
Stop creating them? Care to explain?
See my first post in this thread.

crowkid 09-22-2004 08:42 PM

Elect John Kerry.. apparently, magically, all these beheadings, bombings, and slaughter of innocent children will poof in a cloud of smoke if Kerry is elected... And get this, he doesn't even have to give solutions, he promises victory! What a guy!


http://www.blogsforbush.com/images/bunnyears.jpg

SD Qball 09-22-2004 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
How about you just stop bombing and invading other countries?

That'd be a good start.

You tell em hippie!

SD Qball 09-22-2004 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
A better way......
http://www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/...rld/atomic.jpg

I'll bring the hotdogs and marshmallows

crowkid 09-22-2004 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
See my first post in this thread.

FUCK OFF SURFER

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SD Qball
You tell em hippie!
Okay retard!

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SD Qball
You tell em hippie!
LMAO.... I'm going to stick a daisy in my Assault Rifle right now.
P.S. I'm also writing to a 9-11 family letting them know I am TOTALLY against fighting "terrorism" because people may get hurt.

SuckOnThis 09-22-2004 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen


If you want to stop terrorism, stop creating terrorists.

I completely agree.

As far as what Downtime wrote, theoretically its one of the few things that would work but it would never happen, if for any other reason because Bush loves to keep us in fear.

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
See my first post in this thread.
Look to the left of the screen where it says "jesus". This just demonstrates that you're a "jesus" touting.... tree hugging...patcouli oil wearing...surfing homo. Fuck you. You should vote for Nader instead.
:321GFY :helpme

crowkid 09-22-2004 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
I completely agree.

As far as what Downtime wrote, theoretically its one of the few things that would work but it would never happen, if for any other reason because Bush loves to keep us in fear.

Wait, so Bush was just lying about terrorists plotting and wanting to kill us? You mean I can go about life now and not worry about shit 'cause it was all a big lie! Wow man, awesome solution.


Unfortunately Americans are not that fucking stupid asshole, we dont hug trees and pray for the people on the other side of the world to be good.. We go over there and bring the fight to the towelheads doorstep.

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
I completely agree.

As far as what Downtime wrote, theoretically its one of the few things that would work but it would never happen, if for any other reason because Bush loves to keep us in fear.

It's Bush's job to keep us in "fear"? Were you racked out on zanax on 9-11 or did that put some "fear" in you? You're being attacked stupid.... wake the fuck up.

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crowkid
Wait, so Bush was just lying about terrorists plotting and wanting to kill us? You mean I can go about life now and not worry about shit 'cause it was all a big lie! Wow man, awesome solution.


Unfortunately Americans are not that fucking stupid asshole, we dont hug trees and pray for the people on the other side of the world to be good.. We go over there and bring the fight to the towelheads doorstep.

Once again... A.... FUCKING ..... MEN........

CamChicks 09-22-2004 08:53 PM

this is the dumbest thing I've read today :Oh crap

- You think 9/11 should not have made the news?

- The 1st Ammendment protects Freedom Of The Press

- If one news outlet doesn't cover it (or even if all the outlets you mentioned didn't cover it) someone else would, and the public will go there for information instead.

Your idea is very similar to the 'voluntarily get rid of TGPs and all the free porn so paysites make more money' idea that gets randomly posted here every so often. Noone is going to be the first to pull down their galleries. And even if everyone on GFY did, there would always be others ready to take over that market share.

ThunderBalls 09-22-2004 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
LMAO.... I'm going to stick a daisy in my Assault Rifle right now.
P.S. I'm also writing to a 9-11 family letting them know I am TOTALLY against fighting "terrorism" because people may get hurt.

If one ever wonders why this world is so fucked up a 2 minute conversation with you would put an end to their confusion.

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
Look to the left of the screen where it says "jesus". This just demonstrates that you're a "jesus" touting.... tree hugging...patcouli oil wearing...surfing homo. Fuck you. You should vote for Nader instead.
:321GFY :helpme

Do you love Jesus? :1orglaugh

SuckOnThis 09-22-2004 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
It's Bush's job to keep us in "fear"? Were you racked out on zanax on 9-11 or did that put some "fear" in you? You're being attacked stupid.... wake the fuck up.
I can tell one thing I wasnt doing on 9/11. Having a meeting with the Bin Laden family like daddy Bush was. :1orglaugh

borys 09-22-2004 08:59 PM

Yes, that would be the end of terrorism. The end of freedom and democracy too.

Downtime 09-22-2004 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
this is the dumbest thing I've read today :Oh crap

- You think 9/11 should not have made the news?

- The 1st Ammendment protects Freedom Of The Press

- If one news outlet doesn't cover it (or even if all the outlets you mentioned didn't cover it) someone else would, and the public will go there for information instead.

Your idea is very similar to the 'voluntarily get rid of TGPs and all the free porn so paysites make more money' idea that gets randomly posted here every so often. Noone is going to be the first to pull down their galleries. And even if everyone on GFY did, there would always be others ready to take over that market share.

I do think 9/11 should have been aired. I do agree with you that this process would be nearly impossible to do; no one has the balls to stand up and be the first one. All i'm saying is that from now on, simply ignore their claims and I bet a solution could be derived.

BRISK 09-22-2004 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
Terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive.
Wrong.

reynold 09-22-2004 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crowkid
Elect John Kerry.. apparently, magically, all these beheadings, bombings, and slaughter of innocent children will poof in a cloud of smoke if Kerry is elected... And get this, he doesn't even have to give solutions, he promises victory! What a guy!


http://www.blogsforbush.com/images/bunnyears.jpg

ah! i think that's the right one!:thumbsup

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Do you love Jesus? :1orglaugh
Huh? Does it matter? No... I don't "love jesus". But I take offense to you comparing ANY religious icon whether it be jesus, buddah, or allah to a "pedophile".

You a fuckin retard.
Thanks.
:321GFY

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
Huh? Does it matter? No... I don't "love jesus". But I take offense to you comparing ANY religious icon whether it be jesus, buddah, or allah to a "pedophile".

You a fuckin retard.
Thanks.
:321GFY

You're a sensitive bitch, aren't you?

CamChicks 09-22-2004 09:03 PM

Finally, those who watch FOX News probably aren't aware of this, but a Journalist's job is to inform people of facts; not participate in politics or promote an agenda. They are supposed to be objective observers, like a cameraman on the Discovery Channel filming a lion stalking a zebra. His job is to record nature, not to save the zebra.

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SD Qball
I'll bring the hotdogs and marshmallows
I'll bring all the other stuff.... including the families of 9-11 that saw terrorism in the face.:2 cents: They know.....

Downtime 09-22-2004 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
Wrong.
Explain! I'm curious to hear your argument.

mardigras 09-22-2004 09:04 PM

Yes, let's shut up the media. Raise the stakes what it takes to make the news. This is brilliant. Can I be in charge of editing the internet? I have some clever ideas:thumbsup

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
You're a sensitive bitch, aren't you?
Yes.... I'm sensitive to retard, surfer, pro-communism, pacifist, pedophile loving, asshats. And you happen to be one!
:321GFY

BlingDaddy 09-22-2004 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
Finally, those who watch FOX News probably aren't aware of this, but a Journalist's job is to inform people of facts; not participate in politics or promote an agenda. They are supposed to be objective observers, like a cameraman on the Discovery Channel filming a lion stalking a zebra. His job is to record nature, not to save the zebra.
Cam,
And CNN does a better job? Of promoting their view? Please acknowledge that the media left or right is showing us what THEY want to.

:warning

BRISK 09-22-2004 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
Explain! I'm curious to hear your argument.
If terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive, then how did terrorism exist long before TV, radio, newspapers, and the internet?

Joe Citizen 09-22-2004 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
Yes.... I'm sensitive to retard, surfer, pro-communism, pacifist, pedophile loving, asshats. And you happen to be one!
:321GFY

Are you trying to hit on me?

homo.

BRISK 09-22-2004 09:15 PM

Terrorism existed in the 1st century, what media were they using then? Smoke signals?

Terrorism does not need the media.

p3rsian 09-22-2004 09:16 PM

here is a thought
shoot yourself

SuckOnThis 09-22-2004 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
Yes.... I'm sensitive to retard, surfer, pro-communism, pacifist, pedophile loving, asshats. And you happen to be one!
:321GFY

I love exposing lying hypocrites you fucking piece of shit. Pedo? Your site http://www.themasturbationstation.co..._reviews.shtml has a link to http://www.free-young-teens.com a fucking child porn site you sick fuck.

CamChicks 09-22-2004 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlingDaddy
Cam,
And CNN does a better job? Of promoting their view? Please acknowledge that the media left or right is showing us what THEY want to.

:warning

Every American news organization is biased and heavily pro-America, not because the journalists are unwilling to do their jobs, but because the networks cannot afford to offend the advertisers. I believe we need independent news organizations, with funding coming neither from sponsers nor the government. The only way I see this as economically feasible is as a premium channel, similar to HBO. (who produce a better quality product for the same reasons)

In the meantime, get on the net and read a variety of papers from around the world.

BRISK 09-22-2004 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
If we, from a media standpoint, worked together so that all our media outlets, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc, refused to air or even speak of any act of terrorism, wouldn't that stop it altogether?
No

ThunderBalls 09-22-2004 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
I love exposing lying hypocrites you fucking piece of shit. Pedo? Your site http://www.themasturbationstation.co..._reviews.shtml has a link to http://www.free-young-teens.com a fucking child porn site you sick fuck.

I'm sure Lens appreciates him using GFY to push child porn.

Downtime 09-22-2004 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
If terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive, then how did terrorism exist long before TV, radio, newspapers, and the internet?
Hostages in public places with big crowds.

Downtime 09-22-2004 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
Terrorism existed in the 1st century, what media were they using then? Smoke signals?

Terrorism does not need the media.


All your sarcasm aside, I'm aware the internet did not exist during the times of the Vikings and ancient Greece. People still congregrate in public areas, and still have eyes and ears, do they not?

BRISK 09-22-2004 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Downtime
All your sarcasm aside, I'm aware the internet did not exist during the times of the Vikings and ancient Greece. People still congregrate in public areas, and still have eyes and ears, do they not?
So now you also suggest people stop congregating in public places?

Think about what you're saying, it's just rediculous.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123