Scott Peterson: Toast or has a chance to be found not guilty?
 

I personally thing the fucker is toast.

Cant wait for the trial....

who the fuck is Scott Peterson?

Who?

the guy who killed his wife and kid

As don king says "only in America".

Keep this in mind, OJ got off and Martha is gunna do jailtime.

man if that guy gets off white people in LA will riot and burn down their neighborhoods.. it would just be a bad thing

"allegedly" and "kid to be"

lol sad but true murderer goes free , the pie maker gets to go to jail

And I know what OJ was charged for, whereas I have no clue what in the hell martha did.

guilty:BangBang:

The trial is going on now honey pie. Haven't you been seeing all the Amber Frey mess this week? She started testifying yesterday.

I think he's guilty as hell but I'm not sure if they have enough physical evidence to convict him.

I think he did it but there's a good chance he could get off.


1) Garagos is a much better lawyer than both of the DAs together.

2) The murder its self was done perfectly. No physical evidence of any sort. Either extremely lucky, or more likely well planned. It's a hard jump to make for some people that somebody could pull off a perfect murder, and then be so blindingly stupid in the after math. Either he's a genious or an idiot, but probably not both at the same time.

3) 12 average americans does not a group of brilliant minds make.

He's done for. If he gets off it will be a travesty.

he's gonna get slaughtered in the court.

You do know that both Scott and Laci Peterson are white!!!

Not only did the prosecution bungle this case they were caught witholding evidence from the defense...exculpatory evidence.

It's all in the way the case is presented.
OJ was found not guilty. I followed the trial closely and I agree with the verdict.
He was found liable for the deaths of 2 people. I followed the trial closely and I agree with the verdict.

Laci's family might win a civil suit, but won't have access to as much as the Brown's.

yes that was the joke, that and they don't live in LA either :1orglaugh

I still having trouble figuring this one out.

He should fry.

Enough physical evidence? There is zero physical evidence. It's a total circumstantial case, and right now it's looking real bad for peterson, thats for sure, lol!

Been following this one pretty close. No matter how you slice it, with the guy on the phone for hours and hours with amber frey while the whole country was looking for his "missing" wife.. well thats just SO wrong. Even if he was innocent and just trying to hide everything from frey so he didnt look bad, it's just impossible to believe he could speak for hours while his wife was missing.

This is the best witness the prosecutors have had, so they need to make it stick good, because it's a long long time before this case is over and they dont have much (if anything) else!

He will get off. No blood, no DNA or any other trace. He probably did it but the case is so weak. If OJ got off with all that DNA evidence, I can't see how this guy will get convicted :2 cents:

He is going to walk because the jurors are probably idiots like the OJ case. Plus the prosecutors keep fucking up their presentation. But I agree with many others: only in America. Oj walks, Martha goes to jail and young American soldiers die on foreign soil for people who despise us. Really fucking amazing!:feels-hot

Guys cheating with a girlfriend are 100% honest with them, always.

You'll be glad for "idiot" jurors should you ever be accused of something without evidence.:2 cents:

wake up morons.

his wifes body was found where he was fishing.

what fuckin more evidence do you need?

next.

There are hundreds of places to launch a boat in my area.



not

he's guilty as sin but the fucker is going to get off, modesto cops have screwed it up since day one

That is the correct answer.
Sad, but true.

Yeah I think he's going down for this one..

He is a fucking monster man, he is as toasted as my fucking Ego Waffles that i am going to eat later on today. :feels-hot

I thought he had a chance to get away with it because of his good looks, but after hearing his mistress' testimony... he's going to fry. :2 cents:

i have a feeling the guy will get off although i do feel like he did it, his defence team will come in with some twist or legality issue and have it tossed.

jurrors have always been stupid no matter what goes on, its societies way, those who are baby faced just "seem" to be more trustworthy and this is the main reason why i think he will walk "Scott" free. muahaha

He will walk.

I think he'll be found guilty. I rarely am sure anyone is guilty, but if I were on the jury I'd vote for guilty. There's no way an innocent person would make calls to his girlfriend just days after his wife has disappeared and act like nothing tragic is going on in his life. And let's not forget he drove all the way from Modesto to SF, and of all places in the world, she just happens to show up dead near where he was out on his boat.

yup she burried him

suprised they didnt do that after the OJ trial

You would never be on a jury if you told them you would convict soley on the way you think an innocent person should act.:glugglug

One thing you never hear about anymore is that there was an elderly woman neighbor of theirs who said she saw Laci walking her dog that day. The neighbor did an interview for an A&E show on the case. She's since passed away. They also had a man who was driving on the road saying he saw her walking her dog.

Another thing that doesnt seem to come up is the fact that another neighbor of theirs had her home broken into while they were away on christmas vacation. They came home after the holidays and found the break in. Who did it? Havent ever seen any outcome on that.

Another odd thing was that Laci was wearing a fairly unique watch, and a relative of one of the area transients pawned a very similar or same watch a few days after her disappearance.

All defense fodder I guess.

The police errors and shit are bad too.. you'd think they would have learned from the OJ mistakes. Like when Vanatter brought OJ's shoes and a vial of blood home in the trunk of his car and booked it the next day instead of booking it immediately. (blood turned up on the shoes obviously). And how dennis fung testified he brought out 3 bags of evidence when a news clip proved he brought out 4, lol. The cops and prosecutors are causing their own loss of the case... again.

Check out this site, http://scottisinnocent.com
it shows the errors with the case and corrects some things the media has been misleading the public to believe.

I personally think he did it, but the prosecution hasn't met it's burden of proof... yet.

http://www.findlaci2003.us/peterson-scott-mug.jpg http://www.courttv.com/graphics/phot...son-before.jpg http://www.courttv.com/graphics/phot...rson-after.jpg http://www.co.sanmateo.ca.us/vgn/ima...on_booking.jpg http://images.ibsys.com/2003/0112/1884455_200X150.jpg http://nandotimes.nandomedia.com/ips...3-peterson.jpghttp://www.vanceholmes.com/court/laci14.jpg http://www.firstcoastnews.com/assetp...t_peterson.jpg

can't wait for trial? I had to double check the date of this thread. I has been going on for a while now . . . he will likely walk unless the prosecution can start doing better than it has been

has she testified? I did not hear that. she hasn't been cross examined . . .that I do know. Gloria Allred can't prepare her for that

If there is any justice this Wife/Baby killing fuck will get death. I have a feeling if he's convicted they will make a compromise and vote against death.:BangBang: The problem in these high profile murder cases the prosecutors are fucking retarded pussies.

Do you guys remember the NANNY CASE from a few years ago? Gerald Leone and Martha Coakley beat the pants off Barry Scheck and company. Then that pussy judge reduced the charge and gave her time served. :321GFY The Peterson case has poor prosecutors which leaves the possibility of an acquittal.:disgust

for those of you that have already convicted this guy, what are you basing your opinion on? The news media? I highly doubt you are listening to the testimony, so where is your proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

You do realize that the defense gets to present their case before deliberations can even begin, and the prosecution has proved nothing so far, except that he was cheating on his wife.

That son of a bitch better thank jesus christ i'm not on that jury. I think he's guilty for many reasons not the least of which is him placing himself at the very site where the bodies turned up months later. He's an arrogant goof who should go down.

Is it true that ignorance is bliss? That is not what happened at all . . .but you are right about one thing, it is a good thing you are not on his jury since you have violated the first rule given to any juror, you do not arrive at a decision until BOTH sides have presented their evidence.

You have come to a conclusion without hearing ANY of the evidence . . . or at least comprehending any of it as displayed above.

hes going to walk unless they can dig up more stuff

It is a FACT that Peterson was at the San Francisco bay the morning Laci was reported missing, which is where the bodies were found months later. I am entitled to my opinion on guilt or innocence without hearing all the evidence.:)