Constitutional ammendment to ban gay marriage only if Bush is re-elec
 

Bush is finally doing something worthwhile? Nah, even gay marriages isn't a big enough thing to let the dickhead wipe his arse on the American constitution (something that all nations should aspire to PRACTICE, not just have) any more than he already he has.

Bush wants it, the senate doesn't want to touch it until after elections. They aren't going to get the number needed to bring it to the floor. It's dead till after 2004.

This kinda of makes it hard not to vote for bush.

Gay marriage is a joke issue to get your minds off the 30 ways Bush has his cock up your asses.

TERORISM IS THE AMERICAN WAY

BRING IT TO THEM HEAD TO HEAD

STREET BY STREET WE WILL TAKE AMERICA BACK

"forged in the flames of chaos"

Exactly. Conservative parties do the same things here (prolly liberals too). They fuck you up for four years, than they pass some populist law that is rather trivial and get re-elected. Personally, I don't support gay marriage, but I think Bush is even worse.

I dont understand the major damn problem with people who are so opposed to same sex marriages.

Who the hell are these people hurting?

Coverage from the senate resumes on
CSPAN2 2:15 PM ET, about 30 minutes from now.

GW better check himself at the door because there are times when I look at his mother and I know for FACT his father was not opposed to same sex marriage

What happened to supporting "state rights", like Bush and Republicans used to say?

I guess Bush flip flopped again? :1orglaugh

Mens colons across america, take a fist elbow deep up your ass, i bet it hurts.

Weak.. very weak

argh bush sucks

This is a political move that GW has been making on and off for about a year or so now. His advisor that told him to do this should be fired. There is already a federal law that says that the federal government does not recognise same sex marriages as legal marriages. This law was signed by Clinton. So there is no reason to amend the constitution to add a law that already exists except for a poor political manouvre that will get him the votes of the lower intellegant southern bigots that are the only people that seem to vote nowadays.

Just like your ass, you in a diaper yet from all the pounding your hole has taken? Tell me something, what does enema water taste like>

It's not that they are the only ones who vote, it's that the votes of people who live in poor places in the South are worth a lot more than the votes of people who live in productive places like New York and California because of the electoral college.

There are lower intelligent bigots in every state. Just read the political newsgroups.:glugglug

And you're right, they do vote more because they know it get's their morals forced on others. Most everybody else is too worried about what they want / to do 5 minutes from now.

LOL.. At least you are starting to add humor to your stupidity

So because someone thinks gays are dirty little animals that makes them "lower intelligent", i suppose if straight people shoved their tounges up peoples asses in an attempt to massage that persons colon that would make that person "higher intelligent"?

You need to get out tonight and get yourself fisted, not everyone thinks you're cool because you can fit an entire arm up your ass.

I personally don't like gay people, but I'm not against marriage between 2 gayz/lesbians. As long as they don't involve any animals in their private bussinesses :)

I just wanna know this: How the fuck do lesbians make babies?

You nick + your posts in this thread (all about men getting fisted) make me wonder a bit...

they just buy a bottle of baby :)

You do realize that legal gay marriage doesn't mean you have to be gay, right?

The way republicans talk about this "issue", you'd think that the democrats were trying to outlaw strait marriage.

No, one can think whatever they want about someone else. It's when you start to feel superior about it and feel that laws need to be changed to force your values on others is when you become lower intelligent.

Straight people don't perform analingus? Straw grasping?

I've never had more than a single finger up my ass. I'm cool because I don't think like you.

Oh, like a fag parade.


Straights can be disgustingly worthless too, but it's not considered normal


Oh you we're just recruited then, don't worry, it'll strech out after a few months of abuse.

http://www.cnn.com/images/0008/top.cheney.wife.wave.jpg
I respect Cheney's wife for going against her husband and publicly supporting gay marriage.

I find is suprising that as the father of a gay daughter who helped manage his campaign he would be so close minded.:(
http://www.datalounge.com/images/dat...photo/3160.JPG
"Thanks for helping me with the election honey, too bad you'll burn in hell."

Ugh.. thats female?

EpicCash has quite a few gay/lesbian/transexual sites in it's portfolio. Don't you feel just a tad hipocritical promoting them?

A "fag parade" can only be found in the largest cities, so most homosexuals in the US have never been to one. Straight folks are slurping ass in every city in the country. You'll "save more souls" by taking your moral crusade to them.

Is that what you're worried about? That if it's legal you'll become gay? Trust me I've been around straight people all my life. If it were communicable I would have caught it by now. You have nothing to worry about it. Nobody can recruit your kid. Your kid is either gay or not. He'll either be gay when he realizes it or he will fuck up his life while at the same time getting his jollies on the side.

See, and there are those who say it's not genetic.:glugglug

Gotta get you're money before aids takes you down.



I'm on no moral crusade, you fuckers are trying to force everyone to like and accept you, I'm simply rejecting you're demands. I can think on my own.


Oh so you're saying it's genetic so it should be accepted? Child molesters are attracted to little kids, it's genetic also, should i accept them too? theres no difference.

Yeah, that one is clearly genetic. I wont even argue that, i'll lose.

Get over it.

That's in our constitution the electoral college.

And NO it should NOT be change because of the electoral college it worked exactly like it was supposed 2.

And no the constitution should not be changed 2 outlaw gay marrage or 2 make them legal.

Don't fuck with the constitution.

If we didn't have a electoral college the large states would run ruff shod over the small states.

With left wing federal judges there is no such thing as state rights. There are at least two that I am aware of that say having sex with 12 year olds should be legal. You may think it is a good idea for judges to make law but i'll bet you change your mind one of these days.

:Graucho

Always amazing that a party that calls itself "conservative" just wants to impose their own worn out beliefs on everyone else.

I wish they would be honest and just come clean that they want to protect the 1000+ benefits that a "marriage" entitles US citezens to. Worried about wallets.

Whats next, requiring all women to wear skirts below the knee?

all types of left wing judges try 2 **MAKE** law, city, state and federal. A bunch of wacko's that make all judges look bad.

So as long as you make bank your morals are just window dressing?

Think all you want on your own. Don't expect the federal government to project your areas morals on mine without a fight.

It's genetic you want to fuck pussy too. Put everybody in jail that wants to fuck. Problem solved.

Argue with me more, you'll lose again... often

what makes there beliefs worn out, because you don't think they are right?

simple
Go vote then, vote your beliefs in.

You cant legislate someones idea of "morality". Get over that point already.. thats the SPIN for the votes, it's not the legal standing at all.

Nobody should be allowed to get married with the divorce rate ranging from 60%+ for people under 30, and 50% past that..

People are all equally idiots :)

Talk radio is misleading you again.

In case you forgot, it was 5 right wing activist judges that appointed Bush president.

If you are really against activist judges, then you can't say you support Bush, who used activist judges to get into power, unless you are a hypocrite? :1orglaugh

The next time you mention activist judges, just remember that Bush used five right wing activist judges to get his way.

I suppose you are against lawyers too? Without a lawyer, Bush wouldn't be president either.

Did you forget everything that happened a few years ago?

Right wingers are too easy, because they just repeat what Rush and Fox tell them. :)

No what makes them worn out is the natural progress of society. Very simple.

Only 50 years ago it was almost unheard of for a woman to have a child out of wedlock. Time marches on.

It should be left to the states is my standing. People don't have to go to those states if they dont want to after all.

Yeah besides which, judges dont make laws. Congress makes laws. Judges edjudicate/interpret. Police enforce.

You still have not convinced me to accept tounging asses/getting fisted elbow deep/drinking enema water/ect is normal.. I'm waiting for your win

haha, i agree!

Time marches on? That makes it a good idea?
The prisons are full of out of wedlock children.

:Graucho

You want proof of this? Just go to http://groups.google.com and type in "politics"

Do you know that 43 state constitutions already have defined "marriage" as something that exists between a man and a woman?

Sorry, didnt mean to let an on-topic fact mess up your homophobia, carry on :glugglug :glugglug

Time marching on doesnt make anything a good or bad idea. Time marching on means that societies change. What worked 100 years ago, MAY not work 100 or 10 or 1 year from now.

An amendment to the constitution of the united states is not needed. In fact, it is contrary to the constitution itself.

It's not a difficult issue. It's a political issue to get votes from hard line right wing bible thumpers. very easy to see.

I've told you and told you I don't listen 2 talk radio.

Your not worth it. Useless