![]() |
Quote:
|
Dick Durbin is making a great point, lol.
|
Quote:
There are TONS of straight fisting sites out there. What's the percentage of women participating in those activities? Must be pretty high because I see plenty of straight fisting sites to promote. |
Quote:
Calling people names is all that you people have. :Graucho |
genomega, I dont understand your beef.
I'm simply against a completely un needed amendment to the constitution. 43 out of 50 states already have the definition of marriage as something that ONLY exists between a man and a woman. When you say, "Calling people names is all that you people have." I'm not sure what you mean. Moderates? Or do you think I'm a homosexual because I dont think an amendment is needed? lol |
Quote:
The way I see it, they are going to be together regardless. And banning them from getting married is just stopping them from the benefits that come with marriage. Hell, I aint in their house so what do I care. Haha, we only care when it involves our lives, I would be pissed if I couldn't marry a woman of a different race. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:Graucho |
Quote:
|
genomega, you make it sound like it was a rogue judge that passed everything that wasnt stamped with approval from "conservatives" :glugglug
|
I hope this is archived on the CSPAN site, I would love to see Durbin again and catch some stuff I was pulled away from seeing.
|
Quote:
And why did you only ask about lesbians, do you think that two men can make babies? Am I missing some humor here? |
Quote:
To "fundamentalists" homosexuality=beastiality+pedo Lesbians create them and we homos recruit them.:glugglug |
I guess my problem is i've never allowed anyone to shit into my mouth so ive never had a "taste" of the gay lifestyle. I'm not going to do that either so i'll just stay closed minded.
|
Quote:
Consensual between adults = none of your business. |
Rick Santorum
A republican who gets it. |
Quote:
|
It was gratifying to see sen. Kennedy mention my point of the 1000+ benefits that "married" couples get, and how this is just a dead issue. They brought it to the floor, then when the Dems said they would vote tomorrow, the Repubs said No. It was so important to get it to the senate immediately then they say no to a vote? Excuse me?? fuckers.
Also gratifying to see sen. Clinton mention my point that if this was about "marriage", then why arent we doing something about the horrendous divorce rates? Also the fact that the defense of marriage act from 1996 (guess who's campaign brought that about?) has YET to be challenged. The republican senators position is set by Hatch from utah. He says he thinks that since one case in Massachusetts allowed same sex marriage there, that it will automatically be adopted throughout the land. Thats pure shit and he can't justify his position. No state has EVER been forced to recognize ANY marriage from ANY other state. Ever. The supreme court supports that position as well. This is horrible distracting baloney brought on by Bush to try to draw attention away from anything real. Just like his father did. All the more reason to get rid of that idiot, even if you dont like Kerry. |
Great, another reason some people will have to re-elect this ass fucker.
|
Nah, it's a non-reason.
Almost all of the states already have legal definitions of marriage meaning a union between a man and a woman. No case has ever been brought to dispute the *existing* federal marriage act enacted in 1996. No state has ever been forced to recognize a marriage from another state that is contrary to their own state laws. (this is the main reason the republican senators promote this amendment) It's a made-up issue, lol. Typical fear factor *yawn* issue. prominent republican john mccain is speaking now AGAINST the ammendment, lol. |
Since this has fallen flat maybe we'll finally see an increase in the terror alert?
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123