GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Can i get sued by Disney?? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=216289)

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:14 AM

Can i get sued by Disney??
 
For running a site on DaffyDick.com ?

hope not ..

liquidmoe 01-03-2004 03:15 AM

Unless you some how tie it around a duck mascot I doubt it. After all there is also the clothing store daffy's.

flashfire 01-03-2004 03:15 AM

Ya I think you could

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:16 AM

yea i doubt i'll use a duck as the logo

Libertine 01-03-2004 03:17 AM

Isn't Daffy Duck a Warner Brothers toon?

They could sue you though... then again, you can get sued for everything. The real question is if they'll win or not.

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Isn't Daffy Duck a Warner Brothers toon?

They could sue you though... then again, you can get sued for everything. The real question is if they'll win or not.

yea Daffy duck is a toon,,, Daffy Dick isnt,, that what im currious about

Doctor Dre 01-03-2004 03:19 AM

As long as its still small you are probably safe . Just dont get it big ... but then its just a wrong idea to do that you should get another safer domain name

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
As long as its still small you are probably safe . Just dont get it big ... but then its just a wrong idea to do that you should get another safer domain name
its such an easy domain to remember

Libertine 01-03-2004 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Abyss_Vee


yea Daffy duck is a toon,,, Daffy Dick isnt,, that what im currious about

Yes, they could sue you. You'll have to get their attention first though, and if they'll win is pretty much anybody's guess. If you have any other reason for using the name than their trademark, it would help.

JDog 01-03-2004 03:21 AM

I don't think there is any thing infringing on it! If you don't have a duck as a logo or any thing that ties it to Daffy Duck, they wouldn't really have anything to go against you with!

jDoG

$5 submissions 01-03-2004 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Abyss_Vee
For running a site on DaffyDick.com ?

hope not ..

Parody is an exemption to copyright laws. The most recent big test of this that went all the way to the US Supreme Court was when Luke Skyywalker of the 2 Live Crew made a version of "Pretty Woman." He won because his song "Pretty Hairy Woman" was a parody.

mkx 01-03-2004 03:22 AM

Best thing is to get a new domain name as Disney is a big company and has the money for a lawsuit. If they do sue you and lose, you can lose a good 10,000 in lawyer fees. You don't have the advantages of negotiation like you do when dealing with smaller companies suing you.

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JDog
I don't think there is any thing infringing on it! If you don't have a duck as a logo or any thing that ties it to Daffy Duck, they wouldn't really have anything to go against you with!

jDoG

Yea,, i was thinkin as long as i dont link it to their disney character... i should be safe... god knows there are other Daffy's in this world with dicks ? no ?

sacX 01-03-2004 03:24 AM

more likely what they'd do is take you to WIPO and win the domain through their arbitration process. Unless you are well prepared they would most likely win.

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by raulph
Best thing is to get a new domain name as Disney is a big company and has the money for a lawsuit. If they do sue you and lose, you can lose a good 10,000 in lawyer fees. You don't have the advantages of negotiation like you do when dealing with smaller companies suing you.
The Publicity :)

Rorschach 01-03-2004 03:25 AM

I wonder how many 10 year olds you'd get misspelling daffyduck.com.

liquidmoe 01-03-2004 03:26 AM

So whats the line between parody and tarnishing someone's image. Not to mention that a sing that aims for a parody is one thing, but a site, listing porn, say he used a duck mascot, isnt really a parody of the character, and sounds more like something along the lines of using the characters fame to profit.

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rorschach
I wonder how many 10 year olds you'd get misspelling daffyduck.com.
Yea i'll put all the things stating that it has no relation to DAFFY DUCK

i just think its a very catchy name

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:29 AM

Has Anyone gotten sued because of something similar like this?

sacX 01-03-2004 03:30 AM

yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.

It's a bad idea and most likely illegal to run an adult site on that domain name.

Query Zuccarini prison into google if you don't believe me :)

flashfire 01-03-2004 03:31 AM

You can get sued for anything I guess...wether or not they win the case is another story

Abyss_Vee 01-03-2004 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sacX
yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.

It's a bad idea and most likely illegal to run an adult site on that domain name.

Query Zuccarini prison into google if you don't believe me :)

Zuccarini reportedly admitted to 49 counts of using domain names to direct minors to nudity or sexually explicit content. Each count is punishable by up to four years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

fuzebox 01-03-2004 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Isn't Daffy Duck a Warner Brothers toon?
Nope, You can't get sued by Disney :)

baddog 01-03-2004 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sacX
yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.


exactly, you must be looking for trouble, without even having to take Warner Bros into consideration

bopha 01-03-2004 07:01 AM

I don't think I'd risk it. :2 cents:

pradaboy 01-03-2004 07:05 AM

think about it... WB has the money to sue your ass all over the place... I would leave it

:2 cents:

$5 submissions 01-03-2004 07:06 AM

Watch out... famous domain typo squatter John Zuccharini is now going to prison for misleading kids to porn sites. Apparently he owned typos of cartoons that lead to porn. The new law was bundled with the Amber Alert Bill. Pretty heavy penalties.


Quote:

Originally posted by sacX
yeah daffydick is a legitimate typein for daffyduck.. looking at the proximity of I and U to each other.

It's a bad idea and most likely illegal to run an adult site on that domain name.

Query Zuccarini prison into google if you don't believe me :)


Tippy 01-03-2004 08:06 AM

I think you should get another Domain.

No matter how you look at it, it was regged based on Daffy Duck, there is no way you would be able to win in WIPO, no way in hell. I would certainly sue your ass so expect them to do the same.

Even if you decided to keep it and not have a Duck in your logo wouldnt make the tie in which is what you where going for wasnt it, a play on the characters name?

Mike

Greg B 01-03-2004 08:42 AM

http://www.petitiononline.com/roymagic/petition.html

While you're at it, you can help Disney by signing this petition. Roy Disney vs. Michael Eisner.

evildick 01-03-2004 08:44 AM

I know Eidos fucked over the guy that was running ThumbRaider and he lost his domain.

I wouldn't touch that domain with a 10 foot pole because it would definately be considered a typo domain.

Johny Traffic 01-03-2004 08:45 AM

maybe yes, maybe no, but if in doubt it usually isnt worth the risk. Dump it and get a new domain

loverboy 01-03-2004 08:48 AM

you can if you will make use or resemble an image similar to those
of Disney toons

NBDesign 01-03-2004 09:18 AM

Daffy Duck is Warner Bros... so I don't think Disney would sue you for that....

Warner Bros.... is another story and if you used a likeness to their character, YES, they will sue you.

icedemon 01-03-2004 09:21 AM

Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning

Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.

Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.

He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.

Tippy 01-03-2004 09:37 AM

You are 100% wrong ice, I dont care who owns Daffy Duck, they will sue the owner of DaffyDick.com for a fact, moron!

Mike

Scootermuze 01-03-2004 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rorschach
I wonder how many 10 year olds you'd get misspelling daffyduck.com.
This would be their approach if they decided to go after it..

I think there was some flack over people buying domains using misspelled words..

and with the 'i' and 'u' keys being right next to each other, it could be judged that this was the intention.. IF they wanted to pursue it..

Scootermuze 01-03-2004 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by icedemon
Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning

Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.

Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.

He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.

Go register something like playvoy.com and come back and let us know how much it would cost you to prove your point..

Tippy 01-03-2004 10:16 AM

Ice has been Quacked!

Mike

Damian_Maxcash 01-03-2004 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by icedemon
Ok all you numnuts. Daffy is a dictionary word meaning

Definition 1. (informal) silly, foolish, crazy, or weak-minded in mood or temperament.

Daffy has nothing to do with WB. If you uses a duck that is similar in the looks to Daffy Duck, then it might or might not get a letter from WB. He already said, he's not going to be using a duck on his website. So there is no reason I can think of for WB to be looking at his site.

He is using two words "daffy" and "dick". Even though dick and duck are spelled similar, as long as the site has nothing to do with Daffy Duck, he is free and clear.

Im affraid you are very wrong on this one ice.......

beemk 01-03-2004 10:51 AM

they will probably own the domain sooner or later.

Rictor 01-03-2004 10:56 AM

They'll start out by sending you a cease and desist. Then they'll take it to court, whether it's parody or not. Eventually, either you'll win in court or run out of money. It won't come cheap though.

Vitasoy 01-03-2004 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rictor
They'll start out by sending you a cease and desist. Then they'll take it to court, whether it's parody or not. Eventually, either you'll win in court or run out of money. It won't come cheap though.

what he said :glugglug

DBS.US 01-03-2004 06:05 PM

Dont risk it. There are so many other names to use.:glugglug

ulfie2 01-03-2004 06:06 PM

Someone just fell off the turnip truck. The US has a law about misleading domains and they have been very successful in prosectuting people. I doubt WB will do much more than send a C&D but getting prosecuted by the attorney general's office isn't something I would want to take on.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123