Would you fuck a 16 year old?
 

Would ya?

Not illegal where I live

So is that a yes?

The only 16 year old I'd fuck is short, has 4 legs, and screams "baaah" with each and every thrust.

:eek7

If I was 17

yes

The better question is...

would a 16 year old fuck you =D :Graucho

The average life span for a sheep is 10-14 years. You're into mature bestiality? :glugglug

Good answer :thumbsup

Actually the legal age in Denmark is 16.. not saying I would, just stating a fact

Sure, if you get her drunk enough :Graucho

An attractive 16 years old with great natural big tits ?

Hell yes I would !

If she had a fake ID that looked real!!! :1orglaugh

And if she look mature for her age. Too young looking and it's almost like your a pedo.

sure











hmm could be because i am only 2 years older :1orglaugh

Actually I could never touch a 16 year old. There mentality is a huge turn off.

Shit a 25 year old is border line!!! :1orglaugh

so far over 70% said they'd fuck a 16 year old. and these are the same people who had a FIT when dani-model.com said she was 16. (the site is up again and says she's 18 now though.) interesting moral standards you guys have.

True in most cases. Then again, the same can be said for most 18 year olds... and I'm only 21 myself :helpme

:1orglaugh you learned that here, didnt you?

damn how old are you guys ?

I like the way you think. Like you said, they would have to be awefully mature and mature-looking for their age. Chances are very high that I would pass on any opportunity like this, but given the right circumstances..... hey, anything can happen given the right circumstances.


Except sheep. I don't do sheep.

When I was 21, I turned down two 16 year olds who wanted to have a 3some.

For the weeks following, I regretted that decision thinking I was an idiot, but now I'm thinking it's not worth regretting. It was the right decision.

Recently, and more to come when my girlfriend moves.

Learned what here???

You are confusing doing content with having private sexual intercourse. A 16 yr old doing adult content is a huge no-no. A 16 yr old living in an area where it is legal for them to have sex can have sex with whomever they want.

Btw, age of consent in Canada is 14.

Yes circumstances are everything!!!

Except with sheep!!! :1orglaugh

People like to jump on bandwagons, and anyone who sees nothing wrong with 16 year old models, or doesn't really have an opinion, just keeps their mouth shut in those kind of threads. Besides that, people like to be seen denouncing anything they believe their peers won't like. Kinda like sheep...

An anonymous poll is a different matter, though.

GFY = house of perverts. Heh heh

your hand is never the right decision. :2 cents:

legally i see the difference obviously, but morally, what is the difference? please elucidate. in either case it's a 16 year old being utilized for sexual purposes. one is actually fucked in person while in the case of danni...there were some mildly erotic pics that people whack to and never lay a hand on her. so you are saying it's all a legal thing and morality is irrelevant?

ding ding ding. yes. that's what i think it is too.

Having sex in private in most cases has less significant influence on someone's career prospects and such. Once you've been in porn, it will follow you for the rest of your life.

im talking more about teen modeling sites (like danni's is). they border on being suggestive but its hardly porn. how is that so morally rephrensible to people here, but ok to go bang a real life 16 yo.?

im just trying to get at the hypocrisy behind this nonense. i don't see how one can be ok and not the other, or vice versa.

it reminds me of my ex girlfriend. a christian. she wouldn't have vaginal sex because she wanted to remain faithful to biblical teachings...yet anal sex (sodomy) was fine with her. go figure.

Not hypocrisy. Many of us also get judged by what others put online. A big, clear line feels a lot safer :2 cents:

You are reading things into my words that aren't there. I said nothing about whether one or the other was morally wrong, I was pointing out (from a legal standpoint of course) that you seemed to be confusing these two very different things as being the same. They aren't.


As for my moral viewpoint, I'm 40. A YOUNG 40 of course :D , but still, old enough that jumping a 16 yr old in all probablity isn't part of my plan for living. But most of these guys here are in the 20-30 range, thus it is not outside the realm of possibility that a hot 16 yr old might entice them at some point.


Again, doing underage content of ANY kind that involves any sort of sexuality is illegal, so bringing up the dani-girl thing wasn't the best analogy here. But the law of most states and countries says that it is okay for a 16 yr old to be having consentual sex in their private lives, morality notwithstanding.

ok that i can understand. i feel safer too. thats why these "fucking 16 yr old" threads on gfy make me a tad uncomfortable.

Okay - I answered the poll NO - AND I'll post here, just so no one can say I'm hiding under anonymity.

I'll try and make myself clear... let me gather my thoughts...

ahem... here we go...

Those adults among us who would happily fuck a 16 year old girl are fucking disgusting, low life, scum sucking, ball licking, ass munching, shit gobbling, pus swallowing, road kill eating, scab collecting, scat loving, Osama supporting, piss drinking, shitbird fucktards.

Die slowly being dragged through broken glass and tabasco sauce you lower end of the gene pool scum.

And THANK YOU for representing our industry in this way. Oh happy day, can't wait for this poll to appear on the next installment of 60 minutes.

Would I? I still am

My g/f = 16 almost 17 next month.

We have been dating for 2 years now it seems

Like I said, there are certain circumstances. Take myself for example.... back when I had just turned 18, my girlfriend at the time was a month away from turning 17. You're going to tell me that with an age difference of just over a year I was some sort of sicko? Fuck you, goof. Please run out to 7-11 and ask the clerk if there is anywhere in the world where you could possibly buy yourself a clue.

Please... that's OBVIOUSLY not what I'm referring to. And it's obviously NOT the type of situation that 99% of those who answered yes are thinking of. Don't try and twist my words.

As a father, if my 16 year old daughter was dating a 17 year old guy and he turned 18, of course I'm not going to flip out over it.

My point is, this thread is a big rationality play for justifying fucking underage girls, and I don't retract a word of what I said.


:321GFY

let's see the options:

No, I could never find a 16 year old attractive

That's a bit strange, because if you do not know the age of many 16y.old girls you would assume they are 18-21. This means you don't find attractive someone at the age of 18 to 21?



No, because it would be wrong/illegal

I'm not familiar if age of consent in all countries,but I don't think it's anywhere illegal.

What about wrong now. Personally it will make me to sound stupid to say it's wrong since my mother met my father at the age of 16-17, my grandmother was already married at the age of 17 and so on.

I would find more immoral to fuck a 21y.old with the maturity level of a kid and trust me there are a lot of them/

I don't recall to even ever dated as adult a non-adult girl, but this doesnt mean I find it wrong.

codymc12, I don't see you doing anything to change the law. The way you replied shows the same immaturity with the 21y.old girls I mentioned.

This is really stupic. Kinda like asking...would you steal a car? would you deal drugs? etc etc

How do you know if it was the right decision???
I think you're just trying to convince your self that you didn't miss out on something amazin :glugglug

And for the question, 16 year old, sure, if she was pretty and not too imature

I wasn't twisting your words, I was taking you AT your word. Next time maybe be more specific in just who you are flying your insults at then, sound like a plan?


And I agree, in most instances where a way older person is having a sexual relationship with a way younger person who is in their mid-teens it is pretty disgusting, especially from the father's perspective. Yet, how many dads have been enticed by their daughter's hot young friends, or the babysitter?...... lots. Like I said before, I wasn't commenting on the morality aspect, the question was... WOULD you?

Most people's answer, according to the poll, seems to be in line with "under certain circumstances, yes, it could happen". That is all.

My reply had nothing to do with the 'lawyerese' of the poll.

It had everything to do with bare truths and morality. You can cloak it anyway you want, and come up with special situations. You can make yourself feel better by examing all the commas, and demand exact specific, correct wordings that satisfy contractual fine print.

BAH to all of that.

My point is this - the majority of those who answer 'yes' are not saying they would fuck a 16 year old because she looks 18. Or because it's legal. Or because of 'special circumstances.'

They are saying they would fuck her BECAUSE she's 16.

If you think differently, you are welcome to continue in that fantasyland. But that is what it's about, and is the reason I find it objectionable.

It's like that article about all the pedos who beat off to the remake of 'Lolita'. The point was made - hey, they're actually jacking off to an 18 year old - after all, it was a double who did the sex scenes, right?

Just double think rationalization. They were beating off to an underage girl in their minds, and that was the draw.

No different here. No less disgusting.

Yeah if the girl looks more like 17-18 I'm 18

Strange... Ok, i am a lil older now and dont think i would start something with a girl that age, but when i was 21 i had a realtionship with a 16 year old. (lasted 6 years by the way).
And now i have to learn that was the same like stealing cars or selling drugs.

To be honest, even a 16 year old doing porn wont realy bother me . I think that is to young, 18 is a reasonable borderline - not only for Porn. A lot of countries have no problem with sending 16 year olds into war. That is something i have a problem with.

I am NOT Osama supporting.

Oh, i get your point here.

Okay let's get some things sorted out...there's been some funny shit posted on this thread.

Someone saying that they wouldn't find a 16 year old attractive.

Another trying to jump into the minds of those who voted yes in the poll that they would fuck a 16 year old.

cody you're screaming a little too loud to be believed....sorry buddy but it's those who scream the loudest who have the most to hide.

soul rebel...nothing wrong with finding a 16 year old attractive. Damn I think you would have had to be dead to not find Brittney Spears attractive when she first hit the scene and she was only 16 then. However acting upon that attraction if you're more than 3-4 years older IMO would be wrong.

The youngest girl I ever dated as an "Older man" was when I was 30 and she was 19.

Hell I didn't know she was 19, she looked older. She worked for the water department and was a regular lunch customer of mine.

Anyway, when I found out she was 19 from others *very small town* after I had asked her out I was a bit concerned about the age difference and my fears were realized when I went ahead with the date.

We had absolutely NOTHING in common. Not saying she wasn't "mature" for her age. She was, but her reference point in life was still somewhat revolved around her friends who were either still in highschool, or just got out of highschool.

A lot of people fail to realize for thousands of years guys were marrying girls younger than 16. Adolescence in our society is still a fairly new thing. You were a child or an adult not in between. And in a lot of societies once you hit 12 or 13 you were no longer a child.

Sure things were different then, people more than likely were forced to mature at an earlier age and now that we've spent the last 100 years allowing children to be children you couldn't expect some 13 year old boy to go out and start his own life or 13 year old girl to go out and start her own family.

Anyway the original question is/was "would you fuck a 16 year old?"

Yes anywhere up to when I was 19, 20 maybe but is pushing it...and what people have to realize is that there are a number of 18-25 year olds on this board so for them to say they would fuck a 16 year old isn't too far off base.

But now at 37, I'd fuck anything 18 and up...but as far as relationships go I doubt I would date anyone younger than 25.

B

"cody you're screaming a little too loud to be believed....sorry buddy but it's those who scream the loudest who have the most to hide."

Your comment would imply that anyone who comes out against sex with minors is in fact, a pedophile, and should keep their mouth shut.

This is an age old tactic. When someone is outraged (as I was) it's not unusual for someone to use the line you used above.

It's taught in every offensive PR class in every college in the country, and is an age old, effective way to poo poo those with the loudest voices.

It's a great way to imply that the original speaker is, in fact, the criminal, and is not credible as they PROBABLY are involved in the thing they protest.

It is generally used by supporters/purveyors of the very thing being protested.

Did I hit the mark?

Yes, I yell loud and long at a bunch of adults sitting here calmly rationalizing how it's acceptable to fuck underage girls.

Always have, always will.

I guess we just have different values.