A question for women.
 

Men are getting a lot of abuse in the media for "harassing" women in Hollywood. Is this fair?

So my question is simple.

Would you sleep with some for a $100,000 and the chance of a career worth $10,000,000 per year?

We know Natalie would fuck anyone for a lot less. So girls what would be your price?

Be honest with yourself.

kind of a dumb post..who is paying some chick 100k to fuck when you can buy top notch hookers for far less?


anyways...all this sexual harassment stuff makes me think just about every guy who has ever tried to get laid is guilty of some kind of sexual harassment at some point in time.

Paul is mad no one offered to stick a cock in his ass for a job.

Too many people travel from across the country to Hollywood with dreams of becoming Hollywood stars. Most of them would do anything to be famous.

I'm not sure about anyone else... If you told me I had to take a huge cock up my ass for five minutes and I would be both rich and famous for the rest of my life.... Well, that's not a difficult decision to make.

was being shitty

It's sexist that they keep mentioning gender, they should talk about people harassing other people

Erin Andrews says hello.

There are no women on GFY ...

At least we have Garry pretending to be one :1orglaugh

I'm not a girl so I showed the fiancee this post and she said, "I probably wouldn't take the deal because you can't trust someone who is sleazy enough to offer it. Also, does this Paul guy know that even if an actress takes money or jobs from Weinstein in exchange for sex that is still sexual harassment?"

My response to her was, "Probably not. I think he thinks it makes it okay."

I think asking a girl (or a boy) to fuck for money is called soliciting. :winkwink:

I believe most ladies who are attention whores (virtually all actresses) would sleep with a dude just for the chance of building a career (without that direct pay) and they wouldn't even talk about it to pretend they don't do that for the money. If they accepted direct cash, they couldn't deny they were prostitutes.

Just look at the hot chicks in their 30s dating wealthy dudes over 60 .. no one is that naive to believe that is love. :1orglaugh It's just another (indirect) form of prostitution... :2 cents:

I pointed this out to her when she said it. I said something like, "Wouldn't his offer be more like prostitution?"

Her reply was, "It might be prostitution, but it is also sexual harassment because it creates a barrier to entry that includes sex. The guy owns a business and if he requires you to fuck him in order to work for him then it makes for an unfair and hostile work environment for those who don't want to fuck him."

Makes sense to me.

Do we have a prostitute as First Lady?

What is the age difference and how old was he when they got married? Could possibly be the case, lol.

Unfortunately that is only sexist when something is against female gender. against male gender it is ok. As per SJW libby double standard.

It looks like she was around 35 when they married and he was around 60 at the time. They were married in 2005. Today she is 47 and he is 71.

No.......

It fits my definition. :winkwink:

Their choice , so if they like it that way.. :winkwink:

Personally, I wouldn't want a girl to be with me because I am rich (if I was lol). I could have a different prostitute every single day , so why stay with one and get into a commitment??? Seems quite stupid TBH :)

I agree, but that is mainly due to the natural gender differences - males seek females, not vice versa. Only feminazis (manly lesbians) want us to ignore and subvert these differences that can't be changed.

I wouldn't want it either, but to each their own. If they are both happy, so be it.

you complete asshole, no reason for this Markham!

Why mention me when there´s many escorts & models on this forum, if not half the models have escorted...

and besides, most models would take a job fucking guys on set for less than I receive :disgust

and no offence, but I don´t believe you...

if someone opened a briefcase with 100grand in cash, asking to wine and dine you, go back to the hotel and relax for the night, I do not believe you wouldn´t sleep especially with a career worth 10mill later too!

Yeah, although I was speaking of anything male vs female, not just sexual relations between them.
Like for example if some advertisment shows woman in some stereotypical role - SJWs crys dass sexisss. If some advert shows man in some stereotypical role - SJWs stay silent.

The classical libby double standard.

most POV filmographers pay for sex, they pay the model 150 quid and film while they fuck the model.

Every porn film has a model being fucked for a small amount of money compared to Paul Fuckhams post, so not sure why he wants to harass me on this thread :2 cents:

Yeah Paul but they choose to - the woman's choice matters. She may choose to have sex for free. She may choose not to for $1m. It is her choice. Her body is not a commodity, even if we sometimes treat it as as such. When you treat a woman as if her choice doesn't matter about her own body, that is what is bad.

Just because some might consider it, does not mean all women have no control over their bodies.

150 quid - couldn't model earn the same just hookering? Or do they do it because they think they are not prostitutes if they appear on video?

Ps: where do you find models like that? adultwork?

SJWs stay silent cause they are manly lesbians who don't care about men.

I have never heard a normal woman bitch about stereotypes, or cry that she feels bad due to these stereotypes. It's always these fugly dykes who do that.

I'm all about women empowered and independent but what's happening now is these girls crying wolf. They don't know how to get fame anymore and don't respect themselves enough to say "yes, I fucked that guy for a career, got the money and got screwed but IT WAS MY DECISION TO DO IT"
They're whoring themselves around and then act like someone is harassing them.
I'm a nice girl, not half ugly but never in my life have I allowed myself to get in a position (pun intended) that is not comfortable for me around men or about a job.
#getyourshittogether

how much for you to fuck somebody Paul?

thanks for some clarity

You could say "astronomically less".

Why is the $100,000 needed if you make $10,000,000 per year?

Nope. Could neve charge for sex. I'd be ashamed to look in the mirror. If a guy has to pay $100k for sex, something is wrong with him, physically or mentally. There's no guarantee of future earnings either.

I'm not a whore nor would I want to be thought of one or treated like one. I'm no beauty but if I was, with a body to die for, my self-esteem and self-worth can't be bought.

If you think all you can do in life is sell yourself, go to school and get a degree. Get a job and be proud of what you do. Live with less but live healthier and realize you're more than three holes to be used by everyone.

As for Hollywood men, many women know that sex can help them get ahead, but that reputation follows you. Wouldn't you rather earn $$$$$$ based on acting talent and not moaning on cue?

This isn't just a Hollywood problem.

finally someone with practical thinking.

most British models work for $200 a scene, POV full sex, boy girl. Many British models now even work for no money and just do content share, if the guy´s worthwhile :2 cents:

I don´t know, it´s Paul Wankhams thread, ask him :thumbsup



My point to my comment to Paul, why would he mention my name when he´s also paid a lot less to get his cock wet, probably 100 to 300 a shoot...

but hey, I suppose that´s ok because they´re not me???!!! Like wtf, Paul, you´re an ass!

Stupid reply. He's offering them parts in his movies.

Who said he fucked them in their ass? He could have been happy with a BJ and ordinary sex. But at least you're honest.

It's called prostitution.

It may well be harassment if he asks. It's prostitution if she agrees.

I respect you for turning down the chance to earn millions a year. Sadly most girls aren't like you. If they all said no, there would be no scandal.

I believe you opened the door to the article.



and no offence, but I don´t believe you...

I agree with you.

She may consider doing the film for free as well. Those who said yes, chose to say yes. Those who chose to say no walked out. Which one is the majority?

For a girl, I'll do it for free. for you $100,000.

You clearly do not understand the question asked.

You clearly have lost the plot.

She clearly doesn't understand the question.



I've paid a lot less, which proves some girls are willing to fuck for money.

If she agrees it is both prostitution and harassment.

is paul's account hacked ?

if guy is handsome its prostitution else its harassment.

if they benefit from the act, its prostitution, else its harassment.

if they/women cum, its prostitution, else its harassment.

if guy turns down, womens approach its harassment else its prostitution.

if they feel guilty its harassment else its prostitution.

We don't have the term harassment in the penal code here - thankfully, as that is a stupidly defined thing invented by feminists which can be easily turned against any man for a bullshit reason... like saying something sexy to your female co-worker just for fun.


What we have here is Soliciting (also called pimping), Human trafficking and Sexual abuse.

Soliciting - profiting from, organizing and encouraging someone to do prostitution