![]() |
Ontario to commit suicide
Ontario to spend $7-billion on sweeping climate change plan
Quote:
As Canada's largest province this will also drag the entire country down with it. Anybody who has the means and opportunity to move out of Ontario and possibly even Canada would do well to do so. I am seriously looking into it. Are the ********** types of the world happy now? Way to go lunatics. Way to go. . |
you can't take away my natural gas!
|
|
One could argue that Ontario has never been the same since Bob Rae was Premier. I'm not sure it has ever recovered from that era.
I left Ontario (1989) just before Bob Rae was elected as Premier. |
Quote:
Hydro One Ltd: TSE:H quotes & news - Google Finance |
Huh? Why is that problem, i would do completely same thing. Yes i know is pain in the ass but it pays off long term. For example, i would hate if they would plastic bags since i always forget to take a bag when i go to store, but after some time i would adapt as it's not really rocket science to pay attention to think do you need a bag or not when you go to store.
|
Quote:
No offense but you clearly don't grasp the issues at hand and there really is too much to explain to you. . |
This is pretty awesome. Good for Ontario.
Here in Quebec they really seem to be ramping up green support. There are now hundreds of charging stations in Montreal including street-side charging stations (cool!). And at least 1 housing developer now includes solar panels on the roofs of the homes as a part of the cost of the home itself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is no way awesome and it is not good for Ontario or Canada at all. Anyone who says otherwise is a full on idiot. . |
Quote:
Things like this are good as long they dont cause financial damage to average citizen. |
Quote:
This will also spell the end of industry in the province. And yet misguided do-gooders like ********** think this is "cool", "awesome" and "a good thing". . |
Quote:
but you post it here anyway. ? :1orglaugh |
And hey ********** - you want to be truly green? Then release more CO2.
Rise in CO2 has 'greened Planet Earth' And that is a real observable phenomenon unlike all of the supposed calamity that we "may" encounter "sometime" in the future as "predicted" by fraudulent models. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Freezing in the dark because electricity is unaffordable will do a lot more damage to future generations than the life giving trace gas CO2 will ever do. That and being saddled with uncontrollable government debt. You people are so gullible, misguided and shortsighted it's not even funny. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But in reality they most often have no idea what they are talking about and they simply ride along with the herd because they need to feel they are part of the crowd. They are mentally lazy and simply go along with what everyone else is saying. Sadly there are a lot of people who are in for a nasty wake up call and a hard dose of reality. . |
Quote:
You've touted your ignorance before by claiming an excess of CO2 was actually a good thing and humans would thrive in an environment if the levels of CO2 was over 100,000 PPM. Why don't you put a plastic bag over your head and come back and tell us how it went. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obviously you've tried it but you somehow managed to survive as a brain dead moron. . |
Quote:
. |
Ontario can now say:
fastest rising rates in all of North America Ontario electricity rates fastest rising in North America | Guest Column | Colum Most expensive rates in all of North America Ontario Wind Turbines | Ontario has the most expensive electricity in North America And when we try to conserve and actually save energy, they actually increase our rates to make up for how efficient we have become. https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/o...e-today-288979 Quote:
|
I am 80 miles downwind of Ontario (usually). Please dispose of the bodies in a sanitary manner -- TY.
BTW, I thought most of the electric power in Ontario was hydroelectric? Natural gas is relatively low carbon footprint with modern scrubbing. Coal fired plants are the real problem. Burning wood or fuel oil for heat or to generate steam for boilers is a problem. Seems a bit anal to me really. But I am all for cleaner air at your expense :upsidedow |
Quote:
Yep, but notice how it's the people who don't live here that are saying it's a good thing. I have a feeling that when the same nonsense rolls into their neck of the woods they will be singing a different tune. Besides even if Ontario, or the entire country for that matter, reduced CO2 emissions to zero overnight it would have zero impact on global temperatures. We are killing ourselves for nothing. All of this CO2 and global warming bullshit is just a a scare tactic being used to get people to swallow a very bitter pill. Unfortunately it has worked. . |
It's cheaper to use propane or natural gas here!
|
Quote:
Gas/Oil: 28% Hydro: 24% Wind: 10% Biofuel: 1% Solar: 1% . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it's a radical move and i'm not sure i am on board with it myself but there is no destruction here. You can't build all that infrastructure without a lot of hiring going along with it. |
Quote:
|
Good for Ontario eh.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hi Eon, Just because I hold different beliefs than you doesn't mean you should label or dismiss me as a "do-gooder". It doesn't hurt me for one, but more importantly you may be dismissing ideas alternative to yours that actually hold alot of merit. Going "green" is a complex topic with lots of opinions on both sides. And while its true that the cost of electricity is high in many places, it is low in other places. In Quebec, using electricity for transportation makes all kinds of sense, economic sense included. In Ontario its more expensive for sure, but it doesn't mean that its bad. I'd like to ask you more about a couple of things though: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peace. |
Next week AL Gore is flying on his private jet to Ontario to show the local fat cats there how to create banking institutions to scam 100s of millions off cap&trade.
|
Quote:
Plants and trees love CO2. This is no secret. Too much CO2 and other greenhouse gasses is what warms the planet, melts the ice, cause more wild weather, etc. Also you should read the article you linked to. it says: Quote:
And look - there is no reason to fight with me on this. As I said earlier this is a really complex issue. Both sides have opinions. Peace. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
This, from the UK where it doesn't get nearly as cold as here but there is already many in energy poverty: Winter death toll 'to exceed 40,000' Quote:
Quote:
. |
Not to worry. The 7 billion will mostly find it's way to politician and their friends pockets and from there to local Hookers quickly being distributed back into the economy.
|
Quote:
You ever notice that all of these "predictions" of future doom and gloom due to rising CO2 are full of words such as "likely", "may", "probably", "could", etc., etc.? You might get the impression that they have no fucking clue. And that is exactly right - they don't have a fucking clue. To date all of their predictions have been wrong. Show me proof that says x amount of CO2 is too much CO2. Show me proof that said amount of CO2 is what has caused a slight warming, melting ice and more wild weather. In fact show me proof of more wild weather. This is not about opinions this is about facts. Fact: increasing CO2 is causing the earth to green. Fact: CO2 does not have an infinite capacity to cause warming and has already caused all of the warming it can. Fact: Biodiversity thrives in warm climates and suffers in cool climates. Fact: there is no increase in wild weather despite the warming. Fact: there is no increase in the rate of sea level rise despite the warming. Non fact: CO2 is causing excessive warming and will continue to cause increased warming. Non fact: there is more wild weather. Non fact: any prediction of future temperature. Non fact: climate models predicting future climate. Non fact: x degrees is the right temperature for Earth. Non fact: x amount of CO2 is too much. ...etc., etc. I'm not trying to fight with you and sorry for coming off a little harsh but this shit is really starting to piss me off. There is no need for it and it is all completely misguided. Polls constantly show that climate change is on the bottom of the list of most people's most important issues yet this bone-headed government is pursuing it to the exclusion of almost everything else. They are going to completely bankrupt Ontario and Canada in the process and all for no measurable change in anything climate related. This kind of stuff is really a worry for the rich because people who have to struggle just to put food on the table can't afford to worry about it. As for labeling a "do-gooder" I think I am spot on: Quote:
. |
Eon, there's no reason for you to get so upset and defensive. Nasa scientists say too much CO2 in the atmosphere is a bad thing, and you don't have to look too hard to see the damage caused by the fossil fuel industry. If you think they are wrong just like you think the new policies coming to Ontario are wrong, then what do you suggest?
What I hope that you do though is do some research. But don't search for things that serve your conceived notions first. Instead, try looking for the real cost of fossil fuels, the damage caused by it, the health problems etc, and then ask yourself if there isn't a better way. Or if you want, lets try to be constructive about the problem. You think going green is a problem, I say staying black is a problem. You say CO2 is good for plants, I say CO2 creates global warming, while agreeing with you about plants. (By the way, Methane is also a greenhouse gas, but plants don't like it much). We can dance together about this all night long, but neither one of us is going to get laid. So instead, lets leave the name-calling out, and try putting some constructive ideas forward. You don't like the Ontario plan? Fine. What do you suggest instead? Peace. |
canada will never escape its destiny- petroleum production from oil sand.
trying to ramrod green measures down people's throats and businesses won't change that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
provincial government officials(actually just one guy, if i understand correctly, the minister of green shit) trying to usurp that are only going to make fat cats fatter and poor people more poor. taking folks off natural gas and requiring them to use electricity is truly myopic. |
Quote:
Here we go with whole NASA thing again. NASA should stick to what it is supposed to do - launch shit into space. It's pretty sad that American astronauts have to hitch a ride on Russian rockets to get into space yet NASA has no trouble convincing people like you that CO2 is evil and a 1 degree temperature increase is going to kill us all. Talk about losing focus. What of the damage caused by the fossil fuel industry? Is it really any worse than the damage caused by the lithium mining industry? The molybdenum mining industry? The rare earth mineral mining industry? The palm oil industry? The wind turbine industry? Here you go - enjoy being a "green" hypocrite: The Worst Place on Earth Do you enjoy living a comfortable modern life? If so then thank the fossil fuel industry because a your comfortable modern life is not possible without it. If you think it is go for it. I have taken issue with you before about talking down to people. Don't do it. Don't tell me to do research as if to imply that you are better or smarter than me. Don't tell me that "Methane" is also a greenhouse gas and plants don't like it much. You insult me more by taking me for an idiot with comments like that than I have ever insulted you with "name calling". And don't capitalize methane. I have been following and researching this topic for 25+ years. I was once exactly like you and it is through my own research that I came to see things differently. Maybe you should do some research outside of NASA and the NOAA. "But don't search for things that serve your conceived notions first". Try looking for the real cost of a world without fossil fuels, the mass starvation, the freezing in the cold, the lighting of rooms by candle light. (Oops sorry - candles are not permitted because they emit CO2). Is it really humanity you care about or only your own sense of virtue? And I never said going green is a problem. I said cutting CO2 is not going green. CO2 is green. Period. As for what Ontario should do instead? Honestly, Ontario should be building new nuclear or hydroelectric power plants instead of bird and bat chopping wind farms. They should be trying to provide electricity as cheaply as possible to promote economic growth and paying down the provincial debt. And they should stop worrying about the mythological "carbon footrptint". FYI - debt servicing in Ontario now consumes almost 10% of the annual budget - $11 billion a year. It is the fastest growing budget item outpacing both health and education. And this is at low interest rates. A rise in interest rates will be catastrophic. Do you honestly think that broke ass people living in a broke ass province will be able to afford electric cars, electric heat, carbon taxes or even basic electricity? Only wealthy people can afford to be "green". Poor people cannot. Lastly if you can't see that this whole thing is politically dictated then there is no hope for you. Your best bet is to go work for NASA and become another one of the hapless drones that dare not speak out against the mandated dogma for fear of losing your cushy pay check. . |
Quote:
. |
Climate change is real and picking up pace. The debate is over what's causing it and whether we can stop or slow it down.
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://cdn.earthporm.com/wp-content/...nge-7__880.jpg http://greenbuzzz.com/wp-content/upl...il_Spill_1.jpg. Google is your friend. Quote:
But since you bring it up, Yes fossil fuels are worse than wind. A Single wind turbine can produce 750 kW that can power over 200-300 homes. All with no air emissions, no fuel to mine, no fuel to transport, no fuel to store, no cooling water, and no waste. Quote:
Quote:
I am offering my opinion too, which you have invited by posting, which I am allowed to give. I feel strongly about my opinion just as you feel strongly about yours, but it doesn't mean that it should devolve into a fight my friend. Quote:
|
Quote:
And original post highlighted "phasing out natural gas for heating". It has its advantages over coal, but it still emits sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide which contribute to acid rain and ground level ozone. Natural gas | Energy | Climate change | Science & policy | Energy | Issues Quote:
(See? We can agree on something) Quote:
Quote:
You named me in your OP and here I am, giving you my opinion. If your original reason for placing my name in your post was just to fight, then thats too bad and I've wasted my time. Hopefully I'm wrong about that. Maybe your next post will answer that question. Cheers. |
Quote:
it seems like this initiative is meant to build up infrastructure in different industries to make up for the loss? too many countries are getting ahead via sustainable energy anyway |
Very little media coverage of this besides the Globe and Mail.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123