So it turns out Michael Brown robbed a store moments before getting shot....
 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-c...bery-stroe.jpg
"Slain unarmed teen victim of the police getting ready to begin college" Michael Brown physically abusing the store clerk.


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/15...bbery-suspect/


Michael Brown, THUG.

Case closed. The protesters and looters can go home.

so battery equals being shot to death not arrested. got it

Well ……….

Granted he was probably a ghetto thug. However, did not deserve to be shot dead for stealing cigars.

Damn. Philly Blunts don't cost $48.99. Them niggas be trippin, yo!

He wasn't shot for stealing cigars.

Perhaps some of you should stop and consider why his eyewitness friend has not previously talked about the robbery and instead painted the picture of two innocent teens walking down the street. Perhaps you should consider that his eyewitness account is a fabrication and that Michael Brown did indeed attack the police officer after attacking the store clerk.

the first news report said they were confronted by police for walking in the road. :2 cents: not a robbery.

and what does that have to do with the truth ?

the news has been running with the story of his friend as being the truth from the beginning.

Yes he did.
I wish our cops had guns.

And what I'm saying is that this guy just got done physically abusing a store clerk and went out into the street and may have attacked the police officer like the police say he did.

truth is he didnt have a weapon. what about that? asshole :disgust

So what? At least around here summary executions are not the standard, not even for horse thievery.

(from 1:24 on)

i like news trials :1orglaugh have a good weekend :disgust

Do they need the truth? No.

Looks like a stand-up guy who would be much use to society to me...






Oh wait.......

The cop has physical injuries to his face consistent with his report that Brown entered his car and attacked him.

If you believe the eyewitness account, those facial injuries are not possible since he says the cop simply got out of the car and executed Brown.

That isn't what he said , you should re-listen to both eyewitnesses account

There is at least 3 eye witnesses that all say the same thing, that he was running away from the cop and shot in the back, turned around with his hands up and the cop emptied his clip. Even if he did attack the cop (which all witnesses claim he did not) it is still considered murder if he was running away and was shot in the back.

So one day when your child decides to steal something from a store they deserve to be shot dead? :Oh crap

This shouldn't be that hard case to solve, at least regarding the physical evidence. You don't need CSI to figure out that was he shot on the back or not.

so that makes it ok to shoot him dead? come on man..

I'm the last to be anti cop myself but that is fucking brutal.

Instead of rioting, maybe they should go home and raise their kids!

Exactly! About time someone realizes that.

Also the description of how the officer was initially attacked and pushed into his patrol car is similar to the behavior he displayed in the surveillance video.

Not saying he deserved it but think about the cops perspective. He gets dispatched to a robbery. Not knowing that it was a robbery with no weapons etc.

He sees a guy matching the description and the guy gets into a physical confrontation... goes for his gun..

another link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ael-Brown.html

The first reports were based on the story of someone just involved in a robbery with assault, he must have been completely honest when he failed to mention that.


Have you ever "Failed to obey a lawful command by a LEO"? It never ends well when you do!

If you approach a LEO in a threatening manner and are a large individual you are going to get hurt. They legally carry weapons that can produce deadly force.

Now it turns out the eyewitness, other then the LEOs, is now known to have just participated, along with the deceased, in a robbery with assault. His credibility is gone, just like his friend.

Not everyone shot by cops are victims!

Remember a few weeks back that poor crackhead that was shot like "A Dog" in New Jersey?

After he executed a cop with a gun he just had stolen after assaulting a security guard for it.

Thats all fine and dandy but Columbo you are not.

Cop Who Shot Michael Brown Did Not Know He Was a Robbery Suspect

here a security guard shot a man in the back during beer run. think he died. op check my breaking article

Was it confirmed that this was him in the video? Watching CNN this AM and what I heard was that this was footage from a strong arm robbery in the same area that Brown was in w/ his friend, but didn't say it was or wasn't him.

I expect two different sides to have two different accounts of what happened.
The problem is that people pick one person's account as soon as possible and stick to it no matter what.

So with both sides saying different things I look at what stands out as not disputable.
What is not disputable is the number of gun shots that struck the suspect and the placement of those gunshots.

Those gunshots say murder.

:2 cents:

He's a big dude..Maybe one shot wasn't enough to neutralize the threat.. if there was a REAL threat at all. Only they know...

The following quote is from the link you posted :

.

I just watched the press conference. New details..

The officer did not know Brown was the suspect in the robbery (even though it was reported at first that he did)

Brown and his friend were stopped and detained because they were walking in the road and blocking traffic.

Evidence on brown at the scene of the shooting matches evidence stolen from the store. As well as clothing.

It appears as if when the officer approached Brown, Brown may have thought he was being arrested for the robbery and not walking in the street. A possible reason for the struggle.. I'm not sure if I believe that. I think the officer knew the robbery suspect was moving in a specific direction and stopped to detain.. but then again. Only they know.

But he did not know that the cop did not know. It is more plausible that he went for the gun as he had just committed a crime. Come on this done change the way he would react to be stopped by the police. This is not irrelevant.

The biggest MoFo in the world is not a threat when unarmed and already shot 2 times while running away, whether hands up in the air or not.

Honestly it sounds like you didn't even read about it.

Thanks! Corrected.. see my last post.

That's true. 100% true.

Now how does that explain that 2 niggaz walking in the street required a police response?

:1orglaugh

Caught between a cop and a hard place. RIP Bro man :1orglaugh

I'm a big guy and it's disturbing to me that you think a cop needs to shoot me more times than you.

You are somebody that I truly fear.

:Oh crap

Creating a traffic hazard, endangering the safety of the public, impeding the flow of traffic, disturbing the peace, just to name a few possible charges if he was just walking in the middle of the street. :2 cents:

A robbery had just been committed in the area and police presence was escalated.

If the brotha wasn't doing anything wrong and was innocently out for a walk why get into a confrontation with an armed LEO?:Oh crap

We all know White Cops look for reasons to cap a brotha's ass.:upsidedow

Yeah exactly; and why talk shit to a cop and walk in the middle of the street after doing a robbery?

:1orglaugh

Just get out of the street and get away with the robbery right?

.

Never said or implied that...

It happens all the time. :1orglaugh

1 thing for sure is you do not attract unwanted attention to yourself if you are trying to get away with something you should not be doing/have just done. :pimp

I think the kid might have been on something, impaired/high/drunk or there was some psych issue. Common sense says do not act in a threatening manner to a cop.

"Justifiable Homicides" seem to be a rising trend recently!

We are riding different clouds homie.
I consider my argument to be ludicrous.

:1orglaugh

Not surprised.

No one should be shot over a stolen box of cigars.

However, after committing robbery and assaulting someone, then assaulting a police officer and fighting over his gun.... At a certain point in time this crosses the from from a simple crime to multiple felonies, and when you attempt to wrestle away a firearm from a police officer..... At that point you run the risk of getting shot.

There's nothing wrong with that! I grab store clerks by the throat all the time, it's completely normal and sane behavior.

Which is why I say he (Mr Brown) must have been in some way impaired.

No innocent person is going to get involved in a physical altercation with a LEO and attempt to control the LEO's firearm.

An individual that is impaired, even unarmed, is a potential serious risk to the public, LEO's, and themselves.

When they become agitated and aggressive there are few choices for a LEO acting alone.

No one deserves to be shot over stealing something. However, when someone tries to wrestle away a firearm from a police officer.... That's a different story.

Police Chief has already said the officer who shot Brown had no knowledge of him being a robbery suspect, so it has no bearing on the case. Also, it's not been verified yet that it's him.

Even if it is him being a thug bastard, that doesn't mean he should be shot. And you can't claim trying to wrestle the officers weapon as a defense when the guy was running away. Police should respond with deadly force only when confronted with equal deadly force. Shooting someone with no gun in their hand doesn't fall into that category.

Of course, leave it to Fox News to play up this part of the story --- and they'll end up with egg all over their face as usual. Notice how they have "comments closed" for this article? It's because the comments section would be filled with racist rhetoric.

They also have comments closed for this article: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/0...tcmp=obnetwork

Are they afraid that sex addicts will take over Fox News?