![]() |
If Obama had a son...
|
Quote:
|
I don't get the disconnect where adult webmasters are so quick to judge people. Does it somehow escape your dysfunctional self medicated minds that we are also a misunderstood minority to whom the benefit of the doubt is seldom awarded?
Granted, we are less likely to be shot in the back for jay-walking, but still it seems most of us would like to see law enforcement behave with professionalism at all times or face the same penalties as anyone else when they don't. The simple facts are: You don't shoot someone in the back. You don't shoot someone who is running from you. You don't shoot someone because you lost a fight. You don't apply the death penalty to anyone, ever, unless you are a jury of his peers, in a court of law. Extra-judicial killings make us ALL less safe, less free, they are an affront to the concept of law, they undermine the credibility of all law enforcement everywhere, and are just plain murder. If the guy had been shot in the face I would feel a lot different about it, but as it stands, this is fucked up shit, it's happening too much, and it needs to stop. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't rob a store and then walk down the middle of the street holding up traffic while on your power trip and then attack the police officer who tells you to get on the sidewalk. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
I find it hilarious the same people that defended Zimmerman now know for a fact this kid tried to reach inside a cop car and try to take a cops gun from him. The same people that yesterday claimed cops were nothing more than an arm for Obama's socialist agenda now today think this cops word is as good as gold.
These same cops beat a man in 2009 and then charged him for getting blood on their uniforms. Police apologists have got to be the sickest bunch. Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him. ?On and/or about the 20th day of Sept. 20, 2009 at or near 222 S. Florissant within the corporate limits of Ferguson, Missouri, the above named defendant did then and there unlawfully commit the offense of ?property damage? to wit did transfer blood to the uniform,? reads the charge sheet. The address is the headquarters of the Ferguson Police Department, where a 52-year-old welder named Henry Davis was taken in the predawn hours on that date. He had been arrested for an outstanding warrant that proved to actually be for another man of the same surname, but a different middle name and Social Security number. http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...loody-lie.html |
Quote:
While there is no known footage of the Michael Brown incident, watch this other one.... |
Obviously a violent thug couldn't have possibly been going for a police officers gun, minutes after a robbery which he committed, resulting in him getting shot. Thats just crazy talk.
|
Quote:
What's your justification for the guy who got strangled to death for selling a cigarette? How about the guy who filmed it being arrested? How about his wife being arrested? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/run.../45.1-zoom.jpg |
Quote:
I'm not saying police in heavily black areas don't have a hard job, because some bad shit does go down at the hands of the black folks in those neighborhoods....but Police can't just go around shooting everyone because they're scared for their own lives. They're supposed to protect and serve us. Their oath doesn't say to protect themselves upon feeling the least bit threatened. It pisses me off to see stories about a cop shooting a guy with a knife who is 15 feet away while there's other officers there to back him up, or shooting someone's dog during a bogus raid -- or cowering behind armored vehicles while a shooter rampages through a high school with automatic weapons (Columbine). Your job might involve serious bodily harm because your first priority is to serve us. We're your boss but you've forgotten that as you act like your lords and masters. As far as Ferguson goes, hire a police force that's more reflective of the population. |
Quote:
Not taking sides here, just saying. |
Quote:
|
Someone slained a running man. So sad it has to end that way.
|
Quote:
|
they have a problem there
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/08...otests-images/ (the pastor is white) http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/08...mous-dispatch/ Ferguson Police Excuses Destroyed As Anonymous Shares Dispatch Recordings (AUDIO) FYI The cop wasnt aware of the robbery. |
What do you do when a whole subculture exists that accepts, promotes, glorifies, and then propagates acting like an animal.
I don't think the framers ever anticipated something like that. It may be time to contemplate that, if you don't act civilized, you no longer deserve the benefits civilization imparts. When it's one person, ok, whatever. When it's a percentage of society that may threaten the whole? Maybe extraordinary measures are necessary. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
:2 cents: |
What I'll never understand is why some of you get all bent out of shape when a piece of shit like this guy gets killed?
Hell, I figured the overpopulation crowd would be happy. |
Tennessee v. Garner look it up. |
What happened between the police officer and the killing of that boy is terrible. I hope the cop gets what he deserves, like all criminals, I hope the justice system will punish him accordingly.
What I don't understand is when a tragedy like this happens, why does the entire black community rise up together and protest? Why when a black child gets killed it turns into a huge ordeal? Black men shoot and kill more people than all other ethnicities combined in the US and when kids (white kids and black kids) are getting gunned down in the streets of Chicago weekly, where is the black community with their protests and street marching? Why does the black community only jump on the band wagon when a black kid gets killed by a cop, but when 1000's of black men are killing people, the black community looks the other way? It's a shameful double standard that is going on. "We can kill anybody we want to, but if you shoot just one black child, we are going to rise above and riot in the streets." I'm personally ashamed at how the black community responds to these types of situations. I feel terrible for that young child who got shot, but I feel worse for the violence and ignorance it triggers in the black community. |
This is the difference. If it happens to a piece of trash white kid, people don't riot because they are like, meh while he may not have deserved it he certainly wasn't doing himself any favours.
For some reason black society sees it differently. |
Quote:
Seriously though, I can only assume that you don't rob liquor stores, beat up store clerks, and in general you conduct yourself like a human being. We have that in common. As far as I can see, we should be on the same side. The "non trash, non thug" side. No? |
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IowgsYwFM0g |
Quote:
|
In summary:
Group A is upset because Group B assumes that Person XYZ is guilty. Group B is upset because Group A assumes that Person ABC is guilty. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Tennessee v. Garner says that a police officer cannot shot a kid for purse snatching. They said "cops couldn't shoot every felon who tried to escape". However, at the same time, the same court said "if you've got a violent person who's fleeing, you can shoot them to stop their flight". In this case you can argue the kid was a "violent" person - No matter if the officer knew about the robbery (a violent felony), the kid did attack him, attempt to take his firearm, and potentially risked the life of the officer. If you accept the police version of the story, the kid attempted to steal the officer's firearm and was going to shoot him. At that point you cannot deny he was a violent person, and you cannot deny he was a threat to society. |
Last I was told, a cop can shoot you in the back if you're running from a felony. Unless laws have changed...
|
Quote:
What most people don't understand is that a potentially deadly situation with a police officer and a suspect is not over until the suspect is taken into custody and is handcuffed, secured, and locked in a police car. This kid already wrestled with a police officer moments before, tried to take his weapon, and a shot was fired - what's to stop him from putting his hands up, laying down, and then trying to grab the weapon again? I also don't think it went down the way the witness said. I see it on COPs all the time - police get suspect to put their hands up or behind their neck, but the danger is far from over. Maybe the kid did stop, and maybe he did put his hands up, but most likely he failed to follow any other instructions the officer was giving him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Read it a few times -- The defendant won judgement in his favor in the US District court, the Appellate court reversed the District Court, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Appellate court for rehearing on the 4th amendment issues. That is the polite way of saying to the Appellate Court you ruled in error. Quote:
|
That said, I read |
New video includes inadvertent eyewitness testimony.
The eyewitness can be heard saying that Brown ran away and then turned around and rushed the police officer who then shot him. This is completely different than what Brown's friend says happened. http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/1686...uson-shooting/ #1 How’d he get from there to there? #2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck {crosstalk} #2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him {crosstalk} #2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him – #1. Oh, the police got his gun #2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him |
Well despite the circumstances the fact remains: Country have one less "credit to society" thug. You can not see it as a bad thing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bullshit. I live in a town that's had its major manufacturing industry literally decimated in the past two decades. Dozens of major steel-manufacturing based companies and textile mills are gone. Good-paying jobs are long gone...and what is left is minimum wage paying service and tourist industry jobs (Burger King, Harveys, McDees)...and call centres. Our hospitals and schools are evaporating. There is no political clout in the region to sway political favour to turn the situation around. My wife and I are among the fortunate (and dwindling) minority to still have decent-paying jobs in the area. Yet, if your assertion was correct - there'd be violent rioting in the streets. But there isn't. Nothing justifies violence. That utter lack of logic behind trashing your own neighbourhood because you're pissed off about issues - stymies me. Following that flow of thought - if I lose my job tomorrow and can't pay my water bill...maybe I should take a baseball bat to my neighbour's car. I like the guy and all - but what the fuck. The foundation for the justification of my violence isn't my fault, right? Pass it off as me being a product of my environment? Bullshit. People have to man-up, grow a set - and take responsibility for their actions. Stop fabricating issues as an excuse to trash the place. |
Quote:
|
Ok, how about this ? If the dumb fuck didn't rob a store and attack the cop, he'd still be alive today. Even without a weapon, if a cop fears for his life, isn't he allowed to shoot even if he doesn't have a weapon ?? And who knows what the truth is there, it'll probably come out that he shot the guy as he was attacking him next.
I fucking hate how all this shit comes up and it's always the racist card played when in most cases they do stupid shit. Don't break the law and cooperate and you won't have to worry about this shit. If you break the law and run from the cops or reach in your coat like you're grabbing a gun and get shot (different story from the past), and you get shot and killed, too fucking bad for you. And all this rioting bullshit, they don't have any fucking clue who the guy was or could care less. Apparently, they don't care about their community or their neighbors that work to make a living at the businesses that they're burning down. |
NOT shot in back
Quote:
Why would these people have to lie? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123