bye bye Amanda Knox
 

what a whore. hope the jail where she ends up dont have any vip jail cell and she will be threaten as a toy

She can hide out at my house.

She will get justice now

Been amazing how the media always treated this case different because she was good looking. "Foxy knoxy".

Hopefully she gets sent away for a long time and we don't hear from her again...

I will never understand why these processes take so long.

:2 cents::thumbsup:thumbsup

Are you sure you aren't confusing someone else like Casey Anthony with Amanda Knox?

Mine too.

I'll even give her a spanking for being naughty.

Exactly, from what I've seen of the case she's innocent.

She's a proven liar who accused another completely innocent person of the murder. She's a guilty sociopath.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...st-killer.html

This is what you call serial miscarriage of justice.
No motive..... no logic..... no evidence.

I admit I haven't read her book but ive read a lot of media, seen documentaries, youtubes etc and it looks like the girl is innocent and its a really sad state of affairs. The US will have to extradite her in order to maintain the reciprocity of extradition treaties.

why so drama when have to be extradicted? screaming and kicking? stfu you fucking bitch and face the reality! it was to her, not to you :winkwink:

Why? Just because they didn't find the real killer?

Guede is the freak...... did you watch his youtube video?

http://www.enstarz.com/articles/4268...tion-video.htm

She has consistently maintained her innocence in the murder of her former roommate, but new evidence may be able to uphold Amanda Knox's reconviction and force her to serve her prison sentence in Italy.

According to Radar Online, links between Knox and some drug dealers in Perugia have been confirmed, meaning the American could be extradited to Italy to face drug charges-meaning if her conviction for murdering Kercher is upheld after her final appeals case closes at the end of the year, she will be required to serve her 28 ½ year prison term.

I'm pretty certain I would be pissed after spending all that time in jail before being declared innocent because there was no evidence.

From the American media? I'm sure the UK or Italian media show it differently.

That chic is screwed. I would be off to some country that has no extradition treaties with Italy.

She will. Its inevitable and there are so many options.... the problem is then that returning to the US even to visit can be a problem. Why any freedom lover would want to stay in the USA I have no idea but that's another issue....

drugs and more sex.. shocking.

What you heard was a lot of hype because it made a great story :

"Innocent American girl is persecuted by evil foreigners"


There is a footprint in blood on the bathroom rug that matches Sollecito's bare foot.

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.co...hmat_Footprint

The hype was the sensational headlines in Italian press.

In the U.S. all we saw in the news was the first trial dragging on and on and on and that it was nothing but circumstantial evidence, no DNA, etc.

It was quite boring.

Hype over here is when Nancy Grace is vomiting out bile soaked nicknames as she plays judge and jury during her "unbiased" reporting.

Blah blah blah, fuck the footprint in blood right?


.

dont be affraid, she would sue the shit out of them then :) so why the drama?

Ummm ..... was it introduced into evidence during the first trial or the second trial?

The second trial really never got much attention in the U.S. mainstream news.

Us Amerikans are used to a one trial system.

Not this unlimited persecution whenever a new eye witness comes forward or a fresh piece of evidence is discovered.

How about best 2 out of 3?

One more trial is only fair.

Yes but in America we re-open murder cases whenever there is new evidence that is strong enough. In my area, a 20 year old case has new attention because of a apparent confession / bragging about getting away with it that was recorded by police. It's a very fluid story still.

Anyway here's a link: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.s..._evidence.html

There are also appeals and whatnot. So really the American system can keep someone basically under scrutiny if not at trial for their entire life. Especially in murder cases which are never closed.

I've a few books about this and.... I can't see how she is guilty. She was a carefree American student in college abroad; There is zero evidence linking her to the crime. You can say there is DNA but of course her DNA is there - she lived there.

The footprint was why they charged the guy in the first place so of course it was in the trial.

Don't break the code of honor and click the link and actually take an objective look at the footprint evidence,
no, just keep repeating the news media hype.

.

You Knox junkies are just brain washed and repeating hype over and over and you never look at the evidence.

You can't even tell me why the bloody footprint is not Sollecito's even though you believe it's not his footprint.


.

Lord. It's a discussion. Discuss it without talking out your ass like a conspiracy loon.

If it was in the first trial, why did the prosecution lose the first trial?

Like I said, you don't know what you are talking about. They were convicted in the first trial.

:helpme

You don't seem to comprehend that someone asking questions about the trials is an outright admission that they don't know much about the trials.

So, yeah .... I don't know what I am talking about, you big Dumbfuck.

That is why I am asking questions, you big Dumbfuck.

While it was a big story in the U.S., there was nowhere near sensationalistic journalism as witnessed in Italy or other countries.

Apparently I missed the part where she was convicted during the first trial, but was never sent to prison for X amount of years because ...... Italy has a retarded legal system that allows convicted murders the freedom to leave the country until they are convicted a second time ......?

My head hurts.

I really don't care.

I give up.

I'll wait for NBC to do a 2 hour long 48 Hours murder mystery on the story.

You're a fucking idiot.

She was convicted and sentence to 26 years in prison and only released from prison after she won a acquittal on appeal.
That appeal got appealed and she lost again.

:1orglaugh

So now I'm a fucking idiot for not knowing much about the trials and asking questions .....

.... after being brainwashed by the U.S. news media that she was innocent.

Lord.

Dumbfuck.

Big.

Dumbfuck.

You.

Dumbfuck.

You're mad because you're dumb.

:2 cents:

Just dumb for asking questions at the think tank known as GFY.

She's in Seattle. It'll be easy to slip into Canada if and when it becomes necessary . . .

It's all fucked up.

People spending decades in prison get exonerated after new DNA evidence.

O.J. gets away with murder and then ends up in prison because he is a dumbass.

Texas nukes death row prisoners with below average IQs who made confessions under duress.

Unless I have to report for jury duty, I want no part of it.

You won't find me glued to Court TV or Nancy Grace or some British tabloid toilet paper owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself.

Unless the Fed's decide to step in and charge you Federally with the same thing you were just acquitted of on a state level.

True. Very true.

And let's not forget Civil Suits.

Good point and civilly you can lose with much less evidence being presented. So, you can be tried 3 times in the US for the same crime.

I just know from personal experience that when a serious legal matter is prolonged, the stress you and your family goes through multiplies.

So, it is understandable that she is upset - wether she is TRULY guilty or not. I don't care one way or the other.

What baffles me is the way people react to her, as if she has behaved like a thug in the manner of Zimmerman and O.J. since the original crime was committed. No arrests for drug possession. Not a single paparazzi shot of being a drunken slut. No TMZ moments with an intrusive cameraman or photog. No altercations in a nightclub. No accidental shotgun blasts to her lawyer's face during hunting season.

She won an appeal, was set free, wrote a book, did some interviews.

The press across the Pond must obsess about her the way our press obsesses over Royal Weddings.

Great story, it does not have much in the way of facts, lots of opinions...

What baffles you is that she is guilty for the second time.

Do you think she should go to jail for claiming her boss committed the murder and letting him sit in jail for 2 weeks?

.

Were you there during the interrogation?

Did you beat a confession out of her with your big black cock?

No one ever wrongfully implicates themselves or other people under duress during a police interrogation. It never happens, I tell you. Never.

* reaches for the aspirin *

I thought it was only politics but seems you are dumb in every conceivable way.

No, it's more like you're a blind idiot that didn't follow the case.

:2 cents:

You've got an excuse for everything and apparently have some sort of black cock envy complex.

:1orglaugh