GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why aren't there DMCA hollywood film tubes? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1108530)

signupdamnit 05-04-2013 02:34 PM

Why aren't there DMCA hollywood film tubes?
 
So supposedly people (or paid uploaders from Thailand) are uploading 30 or 40 minute full scenes to these adult tubes. So why don't we see all sorts of Hollywood movie tubes which survive off the DMCA where people can upload 90 minute movies? And a better question, why aren't these tubes coming up first in Google for terms like "movies" "films" "hollywood" "hollywood films" and individual movie names.

I think I know the answer. Do you and better yet will you admit it? :upsidedow

MainstreamGuy 05-04-2013 02:42 PM

YouTube, man.

YouTube. Others are DailyMotion, etc.

In fact, Hollywood Studios accepted the fact that they cannot fight against it, and added a "Free Movies" tab in YouTube, but depending from which Country IP you access, you will see it or not.

Same curse as Adult, with content studios making deals with TUBES to post their stuff there. In fact, Content Studios were fighting tubes at first, and now are asking for an account in the tubes to upload their stuff. It's quite funny.

Off topic, can you please tell me which sponsor uses that SHAVING Method you have in your image here.

That's a very serious matter, to be honest. Can't believe nobody else wondered about it.

helterskelter808 05-04-2013 05:19 PM

Because Hollywood isn't sucking the cock of tubes, like adult is.

Comparing Youtube and Dailymotion to porn tubes? Clueless.

The shaving thing is stone age.

MainstreamGuy 05-04-2013 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19611960)
Because Hollywood isn't sucking the cock of tubes, like adult is.

Comparing Youtube and Dailymotion to porn tubes? Clueless.

The shaving thing is stone age.

Ha Ha Ha...

Don't make it sound that personal, dude. :winkwink:

I'm still trying to figure out why you are so pissed with me, that you come to every thread to show your Rage. Maybe you are confusing me with someone else. Who knows.

helterskelter808 05-04-2013 06:15 PM

Am I supposed to even know who you are?

tokmansta 05-04-2013 06:23 PM

They exist, but people mainly torrent that stuff.

k0nr4d 05-04-2013 11:25 PM

When someone is looking for porn, they'll type in "lesbian tube videos" because they mostly want a certain TYPE of porn and not a specific video. No one types in "hollywood movies". They type in "Scarface torrent" you get plenty of torrent movies because you are usually looking for a specific movie.

As for the term "movies", there's alot more associated with that term then just downloading. You have stuff like netflix, cinema schedules, movie reviews etc...

candyflip 05-05-2013 05:27 AM

Hollywood is not as overzealous as the Music Industry is/was. They do what they can, but so long as they are turning huge profits with the big tent pole movies...it's not as big an issue for them as it is for the adult industry.

lezinterracial 05-05-2013 05:36 AM

Don't forget the lawyers. MPAA has some really good lawyers. I remember there used to be some tube site that had hollywood movies. They may still be there.

I hear Manwin has some of the best lawyers.

WarChild 05-05-2013 05:39 AM

Don't fool yourself it happens all the time. The format is just slightly different than tube site is all.

http://www.solarmovie.so/

seeandsee 05-05-2013 11:04 AM

lol you have that same stuff for years, full movies, mostly they run via Java and flash to insert subtitles into it. all dmca safe :P

AdultKing 05-06-2013 01:34 AM

There is no shortage of video streaming sites that allow streaming of DVD Rips and Cam Rips of full Hollywood movies.

We see them all the time, some have impressive Alexa stats and all are illegal.

Many large adult tubes license huge amounts of content, which is something these illegal streaming sites don't do.

Some of these video sites pay uploaders $$ per 1000 views, not something that most adult tubes do.

helterskelter808 05-06-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19613153)
There is no shortage of video streaming sites that allow streaming of DVD Rips and Cam Rips of full Hollywood movies.

Name one site with Hollywood movies that that is anything like a (non-embedding) adult tube.

Quote:

We see them all the time, some have impressive Alexa stats and all are illegal.

Many large adult tubes license huge amounts of content, which is something these illegal streaming sites don't do.

Some of these video sites pay uploaders $$ per 1000 views, not something that most adult tubes do.
There he goes again, a man who tries to make a sly living off the back of piracy, shilling for the piracy-connected sites that have been killing off legit adult sites for years. Have you received money from owners of adult tubes, AdultKing?

I count about 6% of sites in the top 100 at Alexa as adult tubes. Couldn't find a single similar site streaming Hollywood movies. But then Hollywood doesn't have people like AdultKing licking their balls at every opportunity.

tonyparra 05-06-2013 01:47 PM

I think ill sit down cross legged here...and enjoy some popcorn

http://gifstumblr.com/images/reblog-...nxious_732.gif

signupdamnit 05-06-2013 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 19613153)
There is no shortage of video streaming sites that allow streaming of DVD Rips and Cam Rips of full Hollywood movies.

We see them all the time, some have impressive Alexa stats and all are illegal.

Many large adult tubes license huge amounts of content, which is something these illegal streaming sites don't do.

Some of these video sites pay uploaders $$ per 1000 views, not something that most adult tubes do.

I'm not so sure that I agree though that licensing x% of content should give you a free pass for piracy when 10*x% of your other content on the site is pirated. I know of quite a few tubes - and not just Manwin owned - which come up #1 for niche terms (one even allows 10 views a day and then requires a premium account - to view pirated content. If you need to knwo the name I'll gladly email to you, let me know. They are huge in this niche) and are full of pirated stuff. But when I say search Google for "horror movies" I see a bunch of affiliate review sites or other authority sites on the first page. There is only one result which indirectly has pirated movies and that is Youtube at #4.

I know if I opened up hollywoodtube.com and then magically within three days 5,000 hollywood films popped up along with an invite for regular users to upload hollywood films the shit would hit the fan. More than likely the SWAT team would be breaking down my door and dragging my ass to prison. If by some miracle my hollywoodtube.com site survived long enough to make it to #1 in Google for terms such as "horror movies", ":comedy films", etc. I'd bet you $1,000,000 it wouldn't stay up there for more than a month. It's just strange the disparity between the two industries.

signupdamnit 05-06-2013 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MainstreamGuy (Post 19611809)
YouTube, man.

Off topic, can you please tell me which sponsor uses that SHAVING Method you have in your image here.

That's a very serious matter, to be honest. Can't believe nobody else wondered about it.

It's an old story. It's a really touchy subject here since I think Mansion is a top sponsor. Last year I started a thread asking if affiliates trust MPA3 programs and I brought up this past event. The shit hit the fan and evidently Mansion Productions had the thread moved to a non-public area. Recently I posted the image in my sig to a thread where a rep implied that shaving was an affiliate myth. Mysteriously the image was removed three different times on two different file hosts within 24 hours. Probably false DMCA takedowns claiming "proprietary information" when that is not true - it's free speech and public knowledge. I did not bother to inquire yet who asked for it to be removed but it's a good bet that I know who it was. :)

Anyway here is the original story about it from 2004.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=312135 (read the replies)
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=218590
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=171331
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=247600

Here is a thread someone posted asking about why the topic I posted was removed:
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1077992

signupdamnit 05-06-2013 02:42 PM

Btw it looks like the image was REMOVED again. I may have to look into my rights and inquire about it. I might have grounds for a false DMCA takedown notice and other damages. The image is perfectly legal and is not libelous. I will upload it again and update my sig. Each time it gets removed I'll keep it in my sig for another month. If I get booted here for it, I'll post it on three different forums. :upsidedow So Go Fuck Yourself whoever is asking to have the image removed. The fact that you are removing the image still all these years later shows that you haven't learned anything.

DaveMG 05-06-2013 03:01 PM

your biggest mistake is using google to find it. Torrent sites are basically the tube sites for mainstream movies

KillerK 05-06-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveMG (Post 19614020)
your biggest mistake is using google to find it. Torrent sites are basically the tube sites for mainstream movies

no they aren't.

Tube site I don't have to d/l shit, I can just stream the movie.

Torrent I have to hope it actually is the movie it says, and that it works and I take
the risk my ISP will shut me off. They don't shut me off for watching a porn video.

MainstreamGuy 05-06-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 19613997)
It's an old story. It's a really touchy subject here since I think Mansion is a top sponsor. Last year I started a thread asking if affiliates trust MPA3 programs and I brought up this past event. The shit hit the fan and evidently Mansion Productions had the thread moved to a non-public area. Recently I posted the image in my sig to a thread where a rep implied that shaving was an affiliate myth. Mysteriously the image was removed three different times on two different file hosts within 24 hours. Probably false DMCA takedowns claiming "proprietary information" when that is not true - it's free speech and public knowledge. I did not bother to inquire yet who asked for it to be removed but it's a good bet that I know who it was. :)

Anyway here is the original story about it from 2004.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=312135 (read the replies)
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=218590
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=171331
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=247600

Here is a thread someone posted asking about why the topic I posted was removed:
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1077992



WOW MAN!!!

The image was removed again in less than 24 hours!

Holly shit, its incredible how focused these fuckers are in hiding the truth, What the fuck!!!???

I saved the screenshoot just in case. I don't promote MPA3 shitty programs, but the guys doing it, must be pissed.

Do you think other programs do it as well? Other processors and affiliate software...?

If these fuckers from MPA3 programs are so pissed, it means they really care about it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123