Originally Posted by ggrrssyydik (Post 19211494)

Time to put an extra layer of tint on the ambulance. But then again as of now the only to see in is through the front windshield. I guess I need put a door separating the back.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19211541)

Heaven forbid if a sixteen year old boy sees some boobies, but no problem putting Sons Of Anarchy on TV for them to watch.

I never did understand that. Titties bad, brutal killing is perfectly fine.

Originally Posted by 2012 (Post 19211548)

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19211541)

Heaven forbid if a sixteen year old boy sees some boobies, but no problem putting Sons Of Anarchy on TV for them to watch.

I never did understand that. Titties bad, brutal killing is perfectly fine.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19211541)

Heaven forbid if a sixteen year old boy sees some boobies, but no problem putting Sons Of Anarchy on TV for them to watch.

I never did understand that. Titties bad, brutal killing is perfectly fine.

Originally Posted by GARY LEE (Post 19211598)

It looks like I suddenly remember shooting all my outdoor scenes in the studio with a green screen and then shopping in the background. Don't all of you remember the same thing?

Originally Posted by dev777 (Post 19211835)

how's this gonna hold up in places like San Francisco? Forget nudity, I've seen dudes publicly beat off there.

Originally Posted by Radical Bucks (Post 19211545)

or send him to war in others counties when he is 18 to die

Rumor is California is going to ban porn all together.

Originally Posted by Sarah_Jayne (Post 19212280)

Pride will be less interesting without penis nobody wanted to see in the first place on full display.

Originally Posted by Jman (Post 19212055)

Land of the FFFFRRRRREEEEEEE!!!!!


NOT

Originally Posted by mopek1 (Post 19212493)

I still can't confirm this anywhere. Is it even true?

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 19212539)

Here's some of the relevant text from the bill



The new provisions that would come into effect if Prop 35 passes are underlined above.

Originally Posted by pornlaw (Post 19211473)

Nude sunbathing wont get you there but if you are producing anything in public for commercial exploitation then yes and as a producer you can be charged as well...

If...

1.You intentionally exposed your genitals
2.You exposed your genitals in a public area where people were likely to be offended
3.You exposed your genitals with the intent to draw attention to your genitals for the purpose of sexual arousal

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 19212542)

Man oh man what we would ever do without a government?

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19212599)

incredible, of all states that it would be California which passes a law that Puritanical and backwards - i'd expect it in a red Bible Belt state.

Originally Posted by mopek1 (Post 19212552)

I still don't see where it says that being charged for Indecent Exposure (flashing in public, sunbathing nude with genitals showing) results in one being the equivalent of a sex offender?

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 19212629)

You probably aren't going to find that in the text of the Proposition; you are likely to find it in statutory definitions elsewhere in the California penal code, and/or by examination of relevant California case law in this area of jurisprudence.

I'm not going to take the time to document it definitively for you here in this thread; I'm not your personal law clerk. ;-)

What I will say is that in this thread, you have one attorney licensed to practice in the state of California (pornlaw, aka Michael Fattorosi) telling you that certain crimes that none of us would consider "sex crimes" can trigger the requirement to register as a sex offender in California, and me, a layman who is reasonably well-informed on this subject (a function of having covered legal matters as a freelance journalist for quite some time) telling you the same thing.

So, you have two choices; you can take our word for it, or you can confirm it for yourself by conducting the research firsthand. If you go the research for yourself route, keep in mind that this sort of thing depends not only on statutory law, but on case law, as well.

These things vary greatly, state by state, but here's a little gem from the Arizona Department of Public Safety's "sex offender FAQ" (see: http://www.azdps.gov/Services/Sex_Offender/Questions/) that supports what I've already told you:



I hope that helps to address your skepticism. If not... enjoy your research! :thumbsup

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 19212542)

Man oh man what we would ever do without a government?

Answer: FREEDOM!!

Oh no that's scary ahh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 19214836)

Somalia basically does not have a government, things seem to be going really well there! I understand you're a pathetic troll looking for replies but seriously.

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 19214974)

That doesn't even make sense