![]() |
Judge Halts Mandatory Flu Vaccines for Health Care Workers
Quote:
Thoughts? |
They are retarded and I hope the get the flu and feel like shit.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It has nothing to do with them. It has everything to do with they are dealing with people that are high risk.
Why not have claustrophobic nurses not wear masks or quarantine wardrobes. How about we allow people who faint at the sight of blood to work surgery or collecting blood. May as well not require them to stay home if they are sick, they need the money after all. |
The vaccine is the dead flu virus, just because you get the vaccine doesn't mean you won't get the flu, you can get the flu several times a year... and just because you have the vaccine doesn't mean you won't or can't transmit the flu.
That's a smart judge.. |
Quote:
Yes I keep wondering why vaccine people keep saying if you have been vaccinated you can't still pass on the virus lol. |
Quote:
|
did they even bother testing the vaccine? when health care workers don't want to take it, that sends a message.
Local news in boston discussed a 24 year old girl that took a seasonal flu shot august 23rd...she can't talk anymore. i have no confidence in a drug created on the fly... |
Quote:
|
That's fine. When one of their patients gets sicker and/or dies, the families of the sick/dead patient should be able to sue that healthcare worker for recklessness endangerment and a bunch of other shit. Oh, and since it was a personal decision of the healthcare worker, their malpractice insurance should not cover it. Personal liability all of the way.
Having to get the shot is an occupational hazard. You know that shit going in... That'd be like an ironworker refusing to tie off when 500 feet in the air; not allowed. |
Quote:
Creating different vaccines fairly often works in roughly the same way. When you're merely talking about different strains of a specific subtype of virus, the process is almost exactly the same. There are a few possible risks with vaccines: a virus that has not been inactivated, adjuvants (agents to help provoke a reaction from your immune system) that turn out to be toxic, and contamination. Now, the first risk is a rather small one. If something would go wrong there, it would be detected very quickly and the effect would essentially be that you immediately got the disease you were being vaccinated against - the reason it would be detected so quickly. The third risk is a small one, too. It's essentially the same kind of risk you run when getting IV fluid, or even when you something. Obviously, the standards vaccines are held against are quite high, so you'd typically run a bigger risk getting a hot dog from a corner stand or taking some vitamin pills with breakfast. Adjuvants, however, could be somewhat of an issue. They essentially serve to help provoke a reaction by your immune system, helping your body in recognizing the deactivated virus as a potential threat which should be remembered. More practically speaking, they usually induce a tiny local inflammation, which triggers an immune response in the place where the inactived virus is also present, causing your body to basically associate the virus with disease. Obviously, then, they can't be entirely harmless - after all, don't they trigger a response from your immune system? The good news is that they've been researched quite well during the past few decades, potentially dangerous ones are no longer being used, and the ones that actually are used with flu vaccines (where it's already known what kinds are most likely to be useful - something that varies per type of virus) have been well-tested. Moreover, they're not the scary, dangerous materials the alarmists make them out to be. For example, what's often used are aluminum salts, which are also present in your deodorant, your food, etc. The immune reaction being provoked with the vaccines is comparable to that which you would see in a woman who cut herself a little while shaving her armpit and then applied deodorant - a small bit of redness and swelling. There are some more advanced adjuvants, such as certain enzymes found in specific viruses, but those are equally safe, and have been tested extremely well before being allowed on the market. Basically, if on some given day you cut yourself shaving, apply deodorant and aftershave to your body, eat a few meals, come near one or two sneezing people and take some vitamin pills, you're exposing yourself to the same type of "risks" that taking a vaccine exposes you to - larger ones, actually, because the sneezing people have a realistic chance of infecting you with something. Also, keep in mind that with large groups of people, it's inevitable that some things happen - with or without vaccination. Vaccinate a million people, and you will inevitably see a number of them suffer from unexplained or rare diseases in the months that follow. Just because with any given group of such a size, there will be a few people developing unexplained or rare diseases in the timespan of a few months no matter what you do. Hell, among some ethnic groups sudden death during sleep occurs about 40 times per 100k young, healthy population per year (google "sudden unexplained death syndrome"). In a group of a million, that's 33 deaths per month, or slightly over 1 per day - which gives a rather large chance that someone would suddenly die the day after a vaccination if 1 million were vaccinated, despite the vaccination having absolutely nothing to do with it. And that's just one syndrome :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The standard flu shot is safe to say has had time to be studied. Works pretty damn much the same way as polio vaccine, small pox vaccine, and even chicken pox and measles vaccines. Then again parents are trying to prevent the polio, and small pox ones now too. Pretty much on 100% junk science and surprise, surprise we are seeing those pop back up on the map. Terrific reason why celebrities should watch what fucking things they get behind and start yapping their mouths about on a national stage. All for freedom of speech - issue with spreading false/BS info that can cause other people harm. Slippery slope, so naturally I defend their ability to say that shit. General people need to at least get an idea of how smart or educated someone is. Just because they can look good on some show or movie and remember lines - does not make them equally or often more qualified to spread info on such matters over actual scientists. Hell I can probably just bring up MSG right now and watch as the majority of anti vaccine people will also jump on the anti MSG issue too - despite all evidence and even blind studies by those who supposedly have such issues. |
Quote:
Describing flu vaccines as "drugs created on the fly" implies that there's something new or untested about them. But that isn't the case. Flu vaccines are made with existing adjuvants, based on an existing principle, using existing techniques. It's a bit like putting new tire chains on your car when there's heavy snowfall. You didn't just create a new type of vehicle on the fly, you merely adapted an existing vehicle to new conditions. It would be different if they used a new class of adjuvants, or used specific characteristic molecular structures of a virus that hadn't been used for that purpose before. |
He didn't rule that they can't get the vaccine..
He ruled that the government and their employer can't FORCE them to have a virus (even a dead one) injected into their body. BIG DIFFERENCE. Think it through. If an employer is allowed to make an injection mandatory, what comes next? Maybe they require employees to take antibuse so they can't drink alcohol, or they require them to be on a particular medication for any other reason. The decision is about maintaining a person's right to control what does or does no go into their body. Simple and correct decision. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bill Frist family owns hostpitals and is heavily involved in medicine/hosppital business, i woudnt believe anything he has to say regarding medicine since he makes living from it. LOL conflict of interest if there was ever one.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you're going to risk killing leukemia kid, aids guy and scid chick, you probably should go looking for a different job :2 cents: Aside from that, here's a little something to keep in mind: just about every med student gets mandatory vaccinations (hep B). As it happens, most med students have at least one parent who's a physician. So do you honestly believe that the medical community is trying to kill off its own children with dangerous, untested vaccines? |
according to a recent study 1 in 4 people said if they or a family member had h1n1 they would still go into work...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The lifespan of viruses outside of living bodies is rather limited. Moreover, without cells to infect, the virus won't replicate. By contrast, during an infection the body serves as a virus-replicating factory of sorts, copying the virus over and over again. Coughs and sneezes send droplets of mucus containing the virus flying around the room, providing a constant source of potential infections. An infected person has a chance of transmitting the virus that is literally thousands of times higher than the chance of simply carrying the virus from an infected patient to an uninfected one. |
Quote:
Every medical care worker should be HIV tested and fired if they have AIDS but they are not.... Every medical worker should be forced to get a full medical exam once per week but they are not.... Your logic is flawed. Sick people work in hospitals every day. Sick people provide excellent medical care in some cases, and healthy people provide horrible medical care in other cases. Why don't we require ambulance drivers and EMTs to get injected? How about Taxi Cab drivers - They come in contact with more people every day than any hospital staffer... are are far less sanitary. Why don't we require airline flight attendants to get injected? They are on a fucking plane with you for 6+ hours breathing RECIRCULATED AIR that you are all sharing and they are traveling all over the country/world each week where diseases are much more likely to be passed around. Think... :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Minimizing the amount of infections among hospital workers minimizes risk of outbreaks. Providing excellent care doesn't matter if you infect a kid who has leukemia with the flu, since the infection has a good chance of killing the kid. As for cab drivers - they don't typically spend their days among immunocompromised patients, nor do they perform medical procedures which bring them into close physical contact with their clients. Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean a person could never catch it by say touching a door handle on an exam room touched by someone infected then touching a patient right? After all hospitals and doctors offices are 100% sanitized at all times lol.. But shit if it is spread almost 100% by breathing, coughing, or sneezing hospital workers wearing masks should stop that then right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Libertine... what country are you in?
In the US no run of the mill medical care worker has mandatory HIV testing. Urging people with the sniffles to stay home is NOT the same as telling them they are fired if they do not. The idea that the government or an employer should be allowed to REQUIRE you to be injected with anything is simply 'batshit-crazy.' :2 cents: |
Quote:
Again: how exactly do you think the virus gets to hands, objects, etc? Try answering it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123