GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Judge Halts Mandatory Flu Vaccines for Health Care Workers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=933692)

stickyfingerz 10-17-2009 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Libertine (Post 16439596)
What's a long time? Hmm, let's see... perhaps the several days that an infected individual carries and spreads mucus carrying the virus to numerous other individuals and objects? You know, the thing we use vaccinations against?

Also, great job on not understanding that it's not an on/off switch, not understanding that lifetime depends on circumstances, and not understanding that the carrier liquid is not infinite.

One last attempt at making you understand that bit: we're not talking about a surface being "infected" for a specific amount of time. Rather, there is some liquid (mucus, most likely) containing viral particles on a surface. The moment that liquid leaves the body, environmental circumstances for the virus start changing up to the eventual point where no viral particles are left alive.

The longer it takes, the more that die off and the lower chances of infection being spread get. Moreover, every touch of the surface will actually remove some carrier liquid, thus transferring it to the person who touched it (and potentially infecting that person if he transfers it to his mucus membranes). This, however, leaves less to infect others. Because the mucus in question does not mysteriously multiply.

That's why you want to avoid having infected people working around the hospital: they go everywhere and leave a constant trail of fresh airborne droplets and smudged out mucus containing viral particles. If another one picks it up, the cycle starts over again, ensuring another few days of the virus being spread. Etc.

On the other hand, if all workers are vaccinated, the spread is somewhat contained. The waiting room is not a good place to be, but since workers wash their hands between patients (or should wash them, anyway) and probably won't get infected themselves, the virus has far less chance to be spread. Surfaces carrying infected mucus become safe again within a few hours, hands carrying infected mucus become safe again even quicker - basically, the virus dies off pretty quickly if it doesn't get the chance to infect workers going around the hospital.

Rather than functioning as a source of further infection for several days, workers at most function as passive superficial carriers for a very limited amount of time. If you cannot see how that is vastly preferable to having infected people everywhere... ugh.



Yeah, because the flu definitely doesn't kill many thousands of people a year, and it's never happened before that a strain of H1N1 killed tens of millions of people... OH WAIT.

Fucking idiot :disgust

Ill make sure to bump this next year when it turns out that AGAIN it was all bs, and not much more, and WAY less of a problem than any other flu strain. Who can name 5 things that were supposed to be a population killer that turned out to be bullshit? :1orglaugh

Libertine 10-17-2009 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16439631)
Ill make sure to bump this next year when it turns out that AGAIN it was all bs, and not much more, and WAY less of a problem than any other flu strain. Who can name 5 things that were supposed to be a population killer that turned out to be bullshit? :1orglaugh

Eh, in the context of hospital workers, all flu strains are a problem. Even if they have relatively small effects on the rest of the population. Because generally speaking, hospitals tend to contain those people most at risk of kicking the bucket.

But that aside, of course chances of the swine flu being "the big one" are a few percent at most. We know for sure that there will eventually be a huge, destructive pandemic again, but we don't know when it will hit and what it will look like - we just know that it will hit hard.

Keep in mind, though, that it's not a chance of a few percent at most that a million people worldwide will die. It's a chance of a few percent at most that up to half a billion people worldwide will die. If the equivalent of the Spanish Flu hit today, up to one in ten people worldwide could die. There's a pretty good chance that that would include people such as you, your children, your partner, your parents, your friends, etc.

Each time a slightly different virus makes the rounds, there's a huge chance that the effects will be very small, and a very small chance that the effects will be huge. And there's no way to know beforehand which it will be.

Martin 10-17-2009 06:02 PM

The fact is nobody should be forced to take the vaccine. The judge was right :2 cents:

The vaccine doesn't protect you 100% Even if you take the shot you might get sick. The shot it's self might make you sick too. I've looked into some of the ingredients of this flu shot and it's not stuff that I want in my body. I'll take my chances of maybe catching the flu which I haven't had in 12 years.

theking 10-17-2009 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16439631)
Ill make sure to bump this next year when it turns out that AGAIN it was all bs, and not much more, and WAY less of a problem than any other flu strain. Who can name 5 things that were supposed to be a population killer that turned out to be bullshit? :1orglaugh

Although there will be people that die...I don't know of anyone claiming that this strain is a killer. It is being said that in its current form...and if it does not mutate...it is a relative mild flu.

BTW...according to the local paper...in the local schools 1 out of every 5 students and teachers are out with the flu. Substitute teachers are being called in. I am not aware of any reported deaths...thus far.

Joshua G 10-17-2009 07:18 PM

the vaccine is so new, its safety is not tested. Its not intelligent to tell me its safe, trust the system.

i think health care workers will be happy to take a vaccine they have confidence in. its not like they want to spread disease themselves.

virus/immune systems are like software. very complicated, understood mostly by rocket scientists & brain surgeons. before i update software, i want to see if it works in the public. same thing with vaccines. im not interested in turning into a jerrys kid to prevent a disease that not likely to kill me anyway. & neither are the health care workers objecting to the mandate.

If the mandatory vaccine is so smart, why has only 1 state set a mandate?

marketsmart 10-17-2009 07:55 PM

i can get the vaccine this week if i want, but i am torn.. i spoke to a dr friend of mine and he said the highest risk right now seems to be pregnant and very obese women as well as the immune surpressed.. they seem to get the sickest in his hospital... however, they have not had one death and although some of his patients have had to be heavily sedated and on a respirator for 10-14 days, they have all come out ok..

that seems to be worst case scenario outside of death of course which i am really not in the age group for that and i have a pretty strong immune system.

my concern with the vaccine is that this particular strain hasnt been tested for a long period of time.. although i think the majority of people will have no ill effects, i have to determine if the risk outweighs the benefit..

i will say this though, the medical community is worried about how this is multiplying and also about how thins virus will mutate..

maybe i will just flip a coin and let fate decide...

Libertine 10-17-2009 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 16439786)
i can get the vaccine this week if i want, but i am torn.. i spoke to a dr friend of mine and he said the highest risk right now seems to be pregnant and very obese women as well as the immune surpressed.. they seem to get the sickest in his hospital... however, they have not had one death and although some of his patients have had to be heavily sedated and on a respirator for 10-14 days, they have all come out ok..

that seems to be worst case scenario outside of death of course which i am really not in the age group for that and i have a pretty strong immune system.

my concern with the vaccine is that this particular strain hasnt been tested for a long period of time.. although i think the majority of people will have no ill effects, i have to determine if the risk outweighs the benefit..

i will say this though, the medical community is worried about how this is multiplying and also about how thins virus will mutate..

maybe i will just flip a coin and let fate decide...

There is no strong reason to take it at present if you don't work in health care and aren't in a group at risk of complications, to be honest. Basically, your biggest risk is a somewhat shitty week.

Of course, mutations are a danger, but those are mostly important from a public health perspective. From an individual perspective, the danger is too small to worry about.

Major (Tom) 10-17-2009 08:30 PM

I would never take any vaccine ordered to me by a gov.
This thing was rushed into production. It has not even been tested. It has mercury in it, and chemicals found in insect spray. Check out cdc.gov and see for yourself. And you would still put this in your arm? I'd sooner buy a hot dose from a jerry curled heroin pusher, than trust what the gov tells me.
Seriously, think for yourselves.
Duke

After Shock Media 10-18-2009 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16438931)
Maybe they should force every patient to have the vaccine when they come through the door then? After all when they enter the hospital they could be infecting other patients. In order to have the right to be treated at a hospital it should be a mandatory vaccine injection. What do you think comrade?

just a fyi, at admission they always ask if you are current on that vaccine or the pneumonia vaccine, Then often the first of many orders to come if you say no is to give it to you.

theking 10-18-2009 12:43 AM

I checked with a CNA that works at the local hospital and she said that all staff members have been given a flu shot...for the ordinary flu...they do not yet have the shots for the "swine flu"...but expect to have it any day. I asked her if it was mandantory for all staff to receive the flu shot...and she said she did not know if there was/is an option or not. She said all staff were told to get the shot and as far as she knows everyone did.

SleazyDream 10-18-2009 01:27 AM

i feel soo bad for the people who have this flu


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123