![]() |
Is 30% of the Internet traffic file sharing?
Swedish 'Net Traffic Dips As Anti-Piracy Law Kicks In.
And more importantly what does it bring to the other 70% of users? Some of whom I'm sure are still file sharing. :winkwink: Discuss. |
not 30% closer to 90%
|
Quote:
What ever the % is. |
It's not called 'file sharing'.
See gideongallery for his 'terminology'.... time shifting, cloud, backing up files, etc... :2 cents: |
Quote:
More transparency on the Net is a good thing. :thumbsup Unless you want to hide something. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now how do we get more countries to adopt this law. LOL |
Quote:
less choice - as in no release of behind the scenes, workprint stuff for people who would like to pull back the curtain and see how the movies are made and loss of technology - no 42 bit color, no 12.1 dolby surround sound, no sync aroma releases (smellovision) for movies running in theaters. |
European Commission wants to delegalize P2P and make ISPs liable for piracy :thumbsup
|
Quote:
lets limit technology because people will trade software, gimme a break. they gonna ban FTP next? lol real traders do it FTP all this limewire crap is for dumb dads and goofballs who dont know how to get full album rips with one click. FTP FTW p2p FTL lets ban HTTP next, its all filesharing lol |
Quote:
|
99,99% of files shared via P2P are warez, stolen movies and stolen porn
|
Quote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...comp_small.gif Even huge corporations like Electronic Arts puts out 2 gig game patches using torrents, and many other perfectly legal corporate uses. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.torrent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer |
Way more then 30% I'd say, well over the half mark share these days!
|
Quote:
Never have you said anything more crazy. The people who are not file sharing because they don't want to be revealed obviously think differently. More people buy, the more people will release to sell. The rest I assume was a joke. |
Quote:
you were the one who pointed out that the VCR was responsible for all those new income streams for your industry. Had sony lost "timeshifting" case none of that revenue would have happened. every fair use win has caused an explosion of new technological innovations and revenue generating capacity. (vcr -> home viewing marketplace ,format shifting -> cheap solid state disk ...) when/if "access shifting" comes about and the consequence is that movies would have to be released in theaters/dvd/bittorrent at the exact same time to be protected by copyright law. Movie theaters will be forced to differentiate based on technology, which can work in their enviroment but is not technologically or economically feasible in the home (yet). so movies will be filmed in 42 bit color so that movies in the theaters will look 3D without having to wear stupid glasses. Aromas will be piped in and sync with key visual sequences in the movie 12 points of sound articulation will happen for the movies. ultimately those technologies will become cheaper and more efficient and they will migrate to the home, but all of that is being stopped because movie studioes can hide behind copyright law to protect a fundamentally lacking entertainment experience. |
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_shifting Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/victory-dvrs-cloud and that ruling has not been overturned. |
no surprise there :disgust
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
man you really need to put down the crack pipe and come back to reality! |
now imagine teleports ... servers in russia selling datas how to rebuild goods as cars and clothes ... :)
|
Its definitely closer to 50% or more and its a great market waiting to be monetized.
WG |
Quote:
|
My guess is at least 50%
|
Quote:
Does that tell you. They are scared they will get found. It's a good law. If you don't do anything wrong the courts won't reveal your IP. If you do something wrong they will. Then the company being stolen from can take it to the next level. It's not a slam dunk, just another rung up the ladder to stop thieves. |
Quote:
And 30% drop credited to less file sharing is just more bullshit from "anti-piracy" people. There was a 30% drop on the same day last year and it is probably because weather is usually nice on that day (April 1st) in Sweden. But who cares, the law is already obsolete :) And will be removed as soon as the current (USA/Hollywood asskissing) government is out. |
Quote:
Obsolete is something you might hope for. Watch your post box. :winkwink: |
Sharing some illegal shit right now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
WG |
Quote:
idiot. |
this thread only proves most people have no clue
|
Quote:
How much do you pay for cable? Then add the special channels and the PPV and then the adverts. Also adverts are every 10 to 15 minutes, do you see that coming on Torrent sites and Tubes? Great scene with an advert every 12 minutes. Youtube loses money hand over fist. WiredGuy my point is we spend a fortune in this industry "monetizing" people who are unlikely to buy. Yet people who do buy most spend as little as possible. Why try to monetize the bottom of the barrel when it would cost less and bring better results monetizing the top layer? I suppose people are so set in their ways they still think what worked in 1998 still works today. Even though everything points the opposite way. |
Quote:
WG |
Quote:
I can download 100 new movies this week. Illegal or not is really irrelevant as they're nothing to stop me. |
Quote:
cut those spots out you only need to pay the content producers a very small amount for them to break even. you just have to figuire out how to get that small payment from the advertisers (branding bugs you moron) Quote:
second of all rolex vs timex. nuff said. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123