GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   MSNBC poll over 400,000 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=365070)

SuckOnThis 09-30-2004 08:57 PM

MSNBC poll over 400,000
 
71% in Kerry's favor

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6123733/#survey

Fake Nick 09-30-2004 08:58 PM

suck on that mr president

JSA Matt 09-30-2004 08:59 PM

:thumbsup

GatorB 09-30-2004 08:59 PM

Fox poll 99.999% Bush.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 09-30-2004 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GatorB
Fox poll 99.999% Bush.

:1orglaugh

Guess it kinda lets you know really how out of touch the media is with the American Public.

Screaming 09-30-2004 09:00 PM

:thumbsup

xxxdesign-net 09-30-2004 09:01 PM

on cnn.com its
Kerry 80%
Bush 20%

Total: 103444 votes


:1orglaugh

kristin 09-30-2004 09:02 PM

WOW! Huh, I wonder how he's gonna fix the numbers to win this election ...

SuckOnThis 09-30-2004 09:04 PM

Where is the Fox News poll? :1orglaugh

MediumPimpin 09-30-2004 09:10 PM

I can't find the fox poll, here are the others,

CBS Kerry 92.5%
CNN Kerry 79%
MSNBC Kerry 71%

and GFY Kerry 80.95%

Nuff said Bush got his ass handed to him.

Dead13 09-30-2004 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MediumPimpin
I can't find the fox poll, here are the others,

CBS Kerry 92.5%
CNN Kerry 79%
MSNBC Kerry 71%

and GFY Kerry 80.95%

Nuff said Bush got his ass handed to him.

Amen Brotha! :thumbsup

Theo 09-30-2004 09:18 PM

cbsnews

Who won the presidential debate?


John Kerry:
91.97%
President Bush:
7.30%
Neither man. It was a draw :
0.73%

KRL 09-30-2004 09:20 PM

That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.

GatorB 09-30-2004 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MediumPimpin
I can't find the fox poll, here are the others.
Of course not it would show Bush lost.

MediumPimpin 09-30-2004 09:26 PM

Well try to find it I looked, give it shot?

Lensman 09-30-2004 09:28 PM

CNN: http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/result...1.exclude.html

Centurion 09-30-2004 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.
Don't know if you've read about how well the Democrats are doing in registering new voters or not.

NBC had a couple of bits last nite about how the democrats are outdoing the republicans in registering American voters living overseas. And have read in a couple of different mags how in Florida and Ohio, that the Democrats have been registering new voters (likely democratic natch) at better than a 3-1 ratio over the Repubs.

VERY encouraging!

BRISK 09-30-2004 09:30 PM

Announcing the invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003, Mr. Bush said, ?Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.?

Two months into the war, on May 29, 2003, Mr. Bush said weapons of mass destruction had been found.

?We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories,? Mr. Bush told Polish television. ?For those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them."

On Sept. 9, 2004, in Pennsylvania, Mr. Bush said: ?I recognize we didn't find the stockpiles [of weapons] we all thought were there.?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in646142.shtml

Centurion 09-30-2004 09:30 PM

I think this pretty well sums it up:
-------------------

"I'm disappointed in the president's performance," said Allan Ramsey, a 67-year-old retiree who told The Associated Press before the debate that he was leaning toward Bush. "I didn't make much sense of the president's answers."

Angered by the situation in Iraq and the state of the U.S. economy, the Hedgesville, W.Va., man said last week he was open to change in the White House but found Kerry unappealing. That changed Thursday night.

"I was looking for reasons to maybe vote for Kerry, and I think I found them - the point he made about us going to Iraq for the wrong reason, and we don't really have a solution."

Pam Russell, a 55-year-old retiree from Detroit who went into the debate undecided, said afterward she's leaning toward Kerry.

"Bush looked real nervous," she said. "Bush was mad. He kept frowning." "I think Bush, he kept using the same spin and rhetoric instead of him saying something different than he's been saying all the time," she said.


http://www.king5.com/sharedcontent/n....281571d6.html

stocktrader23 09-30-2004 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
That's actually bad for Kerry. Voters will be less inclined to get out and vote thinking he's got enough support without their vote.
The Republican in you rears it's head every so often. :winkwink:

Centurion 09-30-2004 09:34 PM

I was VERY suprised by this debate (pleasantly I might add).

Kerry did much better than I thought he would and Bush DEFINITELY did a lot worse than I thought he would.

Bush really had nothing but the line "you're giving mixed messages" which he pounded into the ground ad nauseum and I think nation nauseum.

I watched it on MSNBC where Ron Regean's first words after the debate: "We have an election! Kerry did very well!"

And STUNNINGLY, Joe Scarborough..very right leaning former Florida congressman who does a show on MSNBC came right out and said "I will admit that tonite, Kerry decisively won the debate."

Man..when fellow right wingers are dumping on ya, you know you gave a stinky performance!

Doctor Dre 09-30-2004 09:36 PM

Bush got RAPED :P

Centurion 09-30-2004 09:41 PM

An example of the new voter registration drive I talked about earlier:

COLUMBUS, Ohio - A sweeping voter registration campaign in heavily Democratic areas has added tens of thousands of new voters to the rolls in the swing states of Ohio and Florida, a surge that has far exceeded the efforts of Republicans in both states, a review of registration data shows.

The analysis by The New York Times of county-by-county data shows that in Democratic areas of Ohio - primarily low-income and minority neighborhoods - new registrations since January have risen 250 percent over the same period in 2000. In comparison, new registrations have increased just 25 percent in Republican areas. A similar pattern is apparent in Florida: in the strongest Democratic areas, the pace of new registration is 60 percent higher than in 2000, while it has risen just 12 percent in the heaviest Republican areas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/po...gn/26vote.html

Centurion 09-30-2004 09:44 PM

One more article about the upswing in new voters:

AP) -- New voters are flooding local election offices with paperwork, registering in significantly higher numbers than four years ago as attention to the presidential election runs high and an array of activist groups recruit would-be voters who could prove critical come November 2.

Cleveland has seen nearly twice as many new voters register so far as compared with 2000; Philadelphia is having its biggest boom in new voters in 20 years; and counties are bringing in temporary workers and employees from other agencies to help process all the new registration forms.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...new.voters.ap/

boobmaster 09-30-2004 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
71% in Kerry's favor

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6123733/#survey

From their website

This is not a scientifically valid survey

boobmaster 09-30-2004 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
An example of the new voter registration drive I talked about earlier:

COLUMBUS, Ohio - A sweeping voter registration campaign in heavily Democratic areas has added tens of thousands of new voters to the rolls in the swing states of Ohio and Florida, a surge that has far exceeded the efforts of Republicans in both states, a review of registration data shows.

The analysis by The New York Times of county-by-county data shows that in Democratic areas of Ohio - primarily low-income and minority neighborhoods - new registrations since January have risen 250 percent over the same period in 2000. In comparison, new registrations have increased just 25 percent in Republican areas. A similar pattern is apparent in Florida: in the strongest Democratic areas, the pace of new registration is 60 percent higher than in 2000, while it has risen just 12 percent in the heaviest Republican areas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/po...gn/26vote.html

There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls.

Tom_PMs 09-30-2004 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
From their website

This is not a scientifically valid survey

No survey or poll is scientifically valid.

Face it, Kerry shined in this night. There's 2 more to go, and VP's go at it next week.

Tom_PMs 09-30-2004 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls.
Try making an actual argument :)

titmowse 09-30-2004 09:58 PM

http://spaceyoga.com/trashy/nervus.jpg

Centurion 09-30-2004 10:00 PM

BoobMaster Posted:

"There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls."

------------------------

Yes there is, but the point I'm trying to make here is that the many of them REGISTERED ON THEIR OWN! The fact that so many new voters have come forth voluntarily would SEEM to indicate that they plan on voting also.

foolio 09-30-2004 10:03 PM

boobmaster = ass clown

SmokeyTheBear 09-30-2004 10:05 PM

Who won the debate? * 590845 responses


Pres. Bush
30% Sen. Kerry
70%

boobmaster 09-30-2004 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
No survey or poll is scientifically valid.

Face it, Kerry shined in this night. There's 2 more to go, and VP's go at it next week.

People cast their votes via their website, for crying out loud. I certainly wouldn't get all giddy over that.

Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.

SuckOnThis 09-30-2004 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
From their website

This is not a scientifically valid survey

From your head

This is not a scientifically thinking brain

boobmaster 09-30-2004 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
BoobMaster Posted:

"There is a HUGE difference between getting them registered and keeping them off crack long enough to actually go to the polls."

------------------------

Yes there is, but the point I'm trying to make here is that the many of them REGISTERED ON THEIR OWN! The fact that so many new voters have come forth voluntarily would SEEM to indicate that they plan on voting also.


We shall see. The democrats ALWAYS get bigger numbers than republicans in voter registration. However, regiastered republican voters are FAR MORE LIKELY to go to the polls than their democratic counterparts.

Centurion 09-30-2004 10:08 PM

Boobmaster posted:

Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.
--------------------------

He DOES?

Hmm..well he obviously forgot to show up with his passion tonite!
He seemed almost ANNOYED that he was even there. I think he was upset because he was missing Nick At Nite! :1orglaugh

boobmaster 09-30-2004 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Centurion
Boobmaster posted:

Yes, Kerry looked very good, and Bush was, well, Bush. He is NOT the most gifted speaker, but there is one thing about him that draws voters: he speaks with great passion. I think you'll be surprised at the public reaction when the REAL polls come out.
--------------------------

He DOES?

Hmm..well he obviously forgot to show up with his passion tonite!
He seemed almost ANNOYED that he was even there. I think he was upset because he was missing Nick At Nite! :1orglaugh

You saw a lack of passion because you DON'T LIKE HIM. It's amazing how blind people can be sometimes.

boobmaster 09-30-2004 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
From your head

This is not a scientifically thinking brain

I copied that quote DIRECTLY from their website. That makes me an idiot? Whatever. I'm not taking the bait anymore. Sorry!

Centurion 09-30-2004 10:13 PM

Boobmaster posted:

You saw a lack of passion because you DON'T LIKE HIM. It's amazing how blind people can be sometimes.

-------------

There is a REASON I don't like him and that's because his policies are terrible and are putting our country at greater peril!

But even withstanding that..my dislike of him didn't sway what was OBVIOUS (Even Lens just posted that Fox News said Kerry won the debate)..and that is that Kerry plastered Bush all over the wall tonite.

uno 09-30-2004 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
From their website

This is not a scientifically valid survey

:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123