GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I would rather have my twin babies die then get a Caesarean Section!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=251201)

Jedimaster 03-12-2004 06:32 AM

I would rather have my twin babies die then get a Caesarean Section!!!
 
Is what this piece of shit said.
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/US/West/...rowland.ap.jpg

And sure enough,,1 of the babies died.

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (AP) -- A pregnant woman who allegedly ignored medical warnings to have a Caesarean section to save her twins was charged Thursday with murder after one of the babies was stillborn.

Prosecutors said Melissa Ann Rowland, 28, didn't want the scars that accompany the surgery.

An autopsy found the baby died two days before its January 13 delivery and that it would have survived if Rowland had had a C-section when her doctors urged her to, between Christmas and January 9. The other baby is alive, but authorities had no further information.

The doctors had warned that without a C-section, the twins would probably die, authorities said. A nurse told police Rowland said a Caesarean would "ruin her life" and she would rather "lose one of the babies than be cut like that."

"We are unable to find any reason other than the cosmetic motivations" for the mother's decision, said Kent Morgan, spokesman for the district attorney.

Court documents give no address for Rowland, and she isn't listed in area telephone books. An attorney was to be appointed for her Friday, Morgan said.

The charges carry five years to life in prison. Rowland was jailed on $250,000 bail.

According to the documents, Rowland went to LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City in December to seek advice after she hadn't felt her babies move. A nurse, Regina Davis, told police she instructed Rowland to go immediately to one of two other hospitals, but that Rowland said she would rather have both babies die before going to either place.

On January 2, a doctor at LDS Hospital examined Rowland and recommended an immediate C-section based on an ultrasound and the babies' slowing heart rates. Rowland left, the doctor told police.

The same day, Rowland allegedly saw a nurse at another hospital, saying she had left LDS Hospital because the doctor wanted to cut her "from breast bone to pubic bone."

A week later, Rowland allegedly went to a third hospital to verify whether her babies were alive. A nurse there told police she could not detect a heartbeat from one twin and advised Rowland to remain in the hospital, but Rowland allegedly ignored the advice.

In January, the state Supreme Court ruled that unborn children at all stages of development are covered under the state's criminal homicide statute. The law exempts the death of a fetus during an abortion.

The law has been used to prosecute women who kill or seriously harm their babies through drug use; it has never been used because a woman failed to follow her doctor's advice, said Marguerite Driessen, a law professor at Brigham Young University.

"It's very troubling to have somebody come in and say we're going to charge this mother for murder because we don't like the choices she made," Driessen said.

BloodFart 03-12-2004 06:38 AM

Too bad she didnt die, but if the govt can force her to be cut open, i'm going on an all out campaign to have homosexuals castrated.

Va2k 03-12-2004 06:38 AM

I saw this last night on the news, I can kinda of understand her point about going under the knife but shit if it was me I would of gone under it *shrugs*

Tom

PetMyKitty 03-12-2004 06:44 AM

why do they care. they're killing babies everyday in abortion clinics.

Mike-BP 03-12-2004 06:46 AM

Ugly whore :321GFY

SureFire 03-12-2004 06:50 AM

What was that woman thinking? She doesn?t deserve to be a mother. Hope she rots in jail. :(

broke 03-12-2004 06:57 AM

Fuck the government.

Politicians are not going to decide when I must undergo an invasive medical procedure. That is ultimately my decision which will be made after considering the pros and cons of the medical advice.

Tracy 03-12-2004 07:01 AM

What a fucking C U N T !


:feels-hot

cool1 03-12-2004 07:06 AM

Very stupid

She should have had the C-Section
It would not have ruined her life
She is already ugly.

dav555add 03-12-2004 07:07 AM

That fucking hahahaha deserves to go to jail.
If you can't assume the risk then don't become pregnant.
She said no to a C-section so that she would not be scared !!!!
Didn't she know she looked like a phat ugly hahahaha anyways???
Some people do not even deserve to live. :mad: :feels-hot

Meta Ridley 03-12-2004 07:19 AM

GO ahead and say shes fucked up. But murder? I dont think so.
Charging her is wrong on SO many levers.

Milena Dickman 03-12-2004 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by coolone
Very stupid

She should have had the C-Section
It would not have ruined her life
She is already ugly.

That's exactly what I was thinking!

kisses,

Milena

DarkJedi 03-12-2004 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PetMyKitty
why do they care. they're killing babies everyday in abortion clinics.
no shit.

WicKed NinJas 03-12-2004 07:38 AM

you dont get cut that fucking much any damn way, plus doesnt she know that it will keep her shit tight....lol

Spunky 03-12-2004 07:39 AM

Then why did you fuck her in the first place? :BangBang:

LadyMischief 03-12-2004 07:42 AM

Stupid fucking bitch.. They should charge her. As someone who's had THREE caesarean sections, and some really bad ones, I can honestly say that they are NOTHING compared to the joy of having babies.

Oh and Wicked Ninjas, you DO get cut that much... my incisions are hip to hip with 38 staples. 6-8 weeks of recovery minimum. It's not easy, but it's still worth it.

radical 03-12-2004 07:46 AM

Send her to the electric chair :thumbsup

broke 03-12-2004 07:55 AM

It's murder not to be able to carry a child to term these days?

Cool -- I'm married to a double murderer.

PetMyKitty 03-12-2004 08:14 AM

i've had two c-sections...
was off for two weeks for the 1st one and off 2 weeks for the 2nd one. the 2nd one felt way better than the lst one recovery wise... sooo much better than going through actual labor which i did with my first kid! i'd have 100 more c-sections over regular labor anyday.

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief
Stupid fucking bitch.. They should charge her. As someone who's had THREE caesarean sections, and some really bad ones, I can honestly say that they are NOTHING compared to the joy of having babies.

Oh and Wicked Ninjas, you DO get cut that much... my incisions are hip to hip with 38 staples. 6-8 weeks of recovery minimum. It's not easy, but it's still worth it.


PetMyKitty 03-12-2004 08:16 AM

i think it's ironic that...

if a woman is preganant and you hit her with your car or something and she has a miscarriage you can be charged with murder of the unborn child.. because the prosecutor argues that the unborn child is a real human blah blah blah.. and then you can turn around and go have an abortion and its ok because they don't consider a baby a real human until it's born...............

Za Ha 03-12-2004 08:17 AM

Stupid bitch. She doesnt deserve a kid.

eiht_98 03-12-2004 08:52 AM

My mother doesn't have such a big incision.

Winterverse 03-12-2004 08:57 AM

Thats really just fucked up, we need to screen these bitches before they jump and have babies.

LaurieX 03-12-2004 09:30 AM

That is BAD!!

CDSmith 03-12-2004 09:40 AM

I'm not saying the government should be able to force anyone to go under the knife, but if a bitch goes this route the government should be able to prosecute the fuck out of her. She could have fucking saved her child for christ sake.



Re: c-sections ---- the severity of the procedure and the size of the incision must be a case by case thing then, because when two of my nephews were born my ex-sister-in-law had c-sections both times. She called what they gave her a "bikini cut".... and the scar was barely visible.

masta flash 03-12-2004 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PetMyKitty
why do they care. they're killing babies everyday in abortion clinics.
yeah, I don't really see a difference

CDSmith 03-12-2004 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by masta flash
yeah, I don't really see a difference
You don't see a difference between a 3 week old fetus and a full term baby ready to be born?

fyrflygrl 03-12-2004 10:01 AM

k, I 100% disagree with the choice this woman made.... I would have had the c-section in a minute...

But let's look at it this way:

If this woman if found guilty of murder because of a choice she made to not have a c-section, won't that set a precedent in our legal system for other women who may face the same choice? And do we want the reasons to have/not have a c-section defined legally for us?

This woman was pregnant with twins... not something usually planned.... and she was given a choice by medical professionals and the consequences explained to her... I believe that almost all women would have had the c-section... so I hope they don't create some crazy law based on this woman's stupidity that prevents choice (and effects the civil rights) of other women.

A legal decision like this could be the difference between 'Ma'am, I strongly advise you to have a c-section, what's your decision?' or 'Ma'am, have this c-section or you'll potentially spend life in jail if the outcome of your decision doesn't please us'....


:helpme

Fyrflygrl

Tofu 03-12-2004 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jedimaster

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/US/West/...rowland.ap.jpg


:throwup

CDSmith 03-12-2004 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fyrflygrl
If this woman if found guilty of murder because of a choice she made to not have a c-section, won't that set a precedent in our legal system for other women who may face the same choice? And do we want the reasons to have/not have a c-section defined legally for us?
The thing is, if both babies had lived there would be no fuss. I don't think there should be a law created to make having the surgery mandatory in future cases..... but I think that if (for want of a better term) some stupid twat wants to risk her baby's life over her own selfish reasons you bet she should suffer criminal charges.... if not murder then something along the lines of criminal negligence or manslaughter.


What I'm saying is, for future cases they should say "Hey, if you want to be a selfish bitch and risk your child's life that is your choice.... but if your child dies as a result of that selfish choice you WILL be held accountable."

CE_BigB 03-12-2004 10:13 AM

My kids were both born C-Section.. 20 yrs ago... and mom was up and around in just a few days..... so I would have encouraged this woman to have C-Section...


However, I shutter at the thought of any govt or entity having the power to FORCE any mother to have C-Section or any other treatment against her will...

sure the kids have rights.. but you cant ask them how they want to be born.. so you ask mom... and moms choice should be final...



Big B

:2 cents: :2 cents:

CE_BigB 03-12-2004 10:14 AM

Now I got another question...

Who The fuck was the blind man that hit that ugly bitch
and knocked her up...???


Big B

Tofu 03-12-2004 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CE_BigB
Now I got another question...

Who The fuck was the blind man that hit that ugly bitch
and knocked her up...???


Big B

I was going to say that too....I want to beat the man whos responsible for that shit.

masta flash 03-12-2004 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CDSmith
You don't see a difference between a 3 week old fetus and a full term baby ready to be born?
A baby is a baby. Regardless of its devolopment stage.
:2 cents:

CDSmith 03-12-2004 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by masta flash
A baby is a baby. Regardless of its devolopment stage.
:2 cents:

Abortion laws see it different. In most states and in Canada there is a time limit set, thus drawing a distinction.



But this case doesn't involve an abortion, it involves a stupid selfish woman whose selfish decision caused the death of her full term offspring. She needs to be held accountable for that decision.

julia 03-12-2004 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by masta flash


A baby is a baby. Regardless of its devolopment stage.
:2 cents:


Not for the law. It all depends on the developpement of the foetus (number of weeks).

-=HOAX=- 03-12-2004 10:25 AM

I'd hit it!:thumbsup

Lykos 03-12-2004 10:25 AM

That sucks...:ak47:

masta flash 03-12-2004 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by julia



Not for the law. It all depends on the developpement of the foetus (number of weeks).

I was just giving my opinion. I relize the law does not see it that way.

CDSmith 03-12-2004 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by -=HOAX=-
I'd hit it!:thumbsup
Why did I know that was coming? :1orglaugh




Let me guess....... boneprone fucked it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123