dumb bitch, but if you put her in jail it's a slippery slope. the religious right would grab ahold of that and run with it.

No problem. You are obviously an anti-abortionist, and that's fine. In principle I too am anti-abortion, but I can also see that legalized safe abortions are a must because people are going to have them whether they are legal or not. They may as well be able to get them done safely. But that is another discussion altogether.


This case may very well be used as a leverage case by the staunch anti-abortion crowd though, your point is definitely valid.

The irony of the situation is she gave life and took life all at the same time. I don't think people should be forced to have any medical procedures done unto them, but in this case I think there has to be some sort of punishment for blatantly endangering the life of her very developed baby.

To me, if she were to birth both babies successfully, then 2 days later left one in the car and it died cause of heatstroke... she'd go to jail. Well, in essence, the babies were live, kickin and ready and she deliberately put one of their lives at risk and now she should have to pay the price. Sure it's her body, but she's out numbered 2 to 1 here...

I'm probably wrong but oh well.

:1orglaugh

She looks retarded :helpme

So are you for late term abortions, or against them?

After all, babys born 3.5 months premature are surviving these days all the time.

She's your type, I can tell from the pic.
She looks drugged ;)

i was watching the discovery channel a few days ago about this couple who was going to have 7 babies due to fertility drugs. the doctors were encouraging them to abort some so the rest would have a better chance at survival.

the couple chose not to abort any.. and all were born ok.. but.. if they had chose NOT to abort any and a few died at birth or were stillborn would they be charged with murder for not heeding the doctors advice to save what children they could???

hmmmmmmmmmmmm.......

I am against late-term abortions, as it should be obvious by a few of my posts here. Most current laws in N. America draw the legal line at around 3 months from conception I believe, but they do vary.


But again I must point out, we aren't talking about an abortion in this case.

by the looks of her... a scar on her body could only HELP that slag

My first thought was...she should be charged for trying to
breed.....at all.

Second was....at least one of the babies got off lucky. It died.
Unfortunately the other one is stuck with that for a mother
whether she goes to jail or not.

Third, it concerns me that she was charged with murder....for
"not" opting for cesaerean. Perhaps if her "motivation" were not
known at the time, a murder charge would not have occured?
Chalked up to a tragic decision instead?

Last time I looked we had a right to say how we will give birth.
There are women this very second, starving themselves, smoking
crack, selling sex and drinking alcohol all while being pregnant,
who then lose the babies to whatever circumstance. They are
not charged with murder are they?

I'm in no way defending this abominable person, I just question
the legal standpoint and have to wonder what they'll tell us we
cannot do next.

Just my :2 cents: .

i had a Caesar salad last night.

I think the difference here is that she approached not having a c-section for the wrong reasons which is why everyone is quick to attack her. It's more of a trial by character, rather than the facts. Although there is certainly a good argument either way, would be interesting to see how this develops in the courts.

The baby is better off dead. Its mom looks like a crack whore. Probably would have had a terrible live or been born brain damaged.

Agreed.

BigB!! Whats up! Let me know when you guys are headed out to the lake again --

EEeeeewwwww! :ugone2far

Fyrflygrl

I couldnt have put it more succinctly myself...

That pic of her reminded me of when Clarice Starling found Benjamin Raspails head in Silence of the Lambs :ugone2far

The scarier part is the libs want to let the woman keep custody of the 1st baby.

sometimes women can be very, very cruel.

this is a sad story

The mother sounds like a real C U N T but charging her with murder is absolutely wrong.

I wouldnt want to be forced under the knife for any reason, any time you go under you take a risk. there can be no certainty that the child would have lived even with a c section, it can only be assumed that the probability of life was much greater. how can you prove that the child died by her choice for natural child birth, you cant. she will be prosecuted because she was made out to be a selfish bitch and she very well may be.

i think her decission was wrong but i support her right to choose not to have surgery.

if she is convicted of murder for her decission i hate to think about the presedent that sets for similar cases where the choice isnt based on 'not wanting a c section scar'.

looks like her head was cut off.

it may have helped draw attention away from that mug of hers

:1orglaugh :321GFY

Homosexual don't kill nobody ... Worst thing they will do is make you shit quicker .

Seriously that's sad ... The bitch was ugly enough already, it wouldn't have changed nothing

Thats a stupid statement.

I believe that the other child is up for adoption.

your point being? You think all adopted children live some wonderful life?