GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   So the us government can seize any domain name? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=990663)

madawgz 10-04-2010 11:55 PM

So the us government can seize any domain name?
 
Let me get this clear,

if you have a domain name, .com, .net, .org or if the registrar you have is based in the good ol' USA they can seize your domain name without warning or court decision?

for example this was an alexa top 1000 website

http://www.filespump.com/

and it was seized because they deemed it to be illegal

Filespump only had a crawler to gather links from megaupload, rapidshare etc and put those links in their search engine, the site didnt host anything.

http://static.desktopnexus.com/thumb...gthumbnail.jpg

GatorB 10-04-2010 11:58 PM

Let me ask you this, if all yo did was hook up drug dealers and drug users but you never sold any drugs could you be arrested? Yes.

Ron Bennett 10-05-2010 12:02 AM

It's worse than that - domain registrars themselves, voluntarily, without a court order, can seize domains.

Just recently, eNom (includes most NameCheap customers too, since they're an eNom reseller) has apparently stepped up suspending domains based on accusations alone from a site called LegitScript - NOT court order, but mere accusation is enough to be suspended at eNom / NameCheap.

http://www.namepros.com/warnings-and...ins-based.html

And while it's easy to dismiss such suspensions as one-offs, see page 2 of that above thread and the link below - domain registrars are under pressure by the U.S. White House administration to voluntarily suspend domains for numerous reasons.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ng-sites.shtml

Ron

madawgz 10-05-2010 12:02 AM

oh and heres the article talking about it

http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-a...-by-us-100707/

madawgz 10-05-2010 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Bennett (Post 17571898)
It's worse than that - domain registrars themselves, voluntarily, without a court order, can seize domains.

Just recently, eNom (includes most NameCheap customers too, since they're an eNom reseller) has apparently stepped up suspending domains based on accusations alone from a site called LegitScript - NOT court order, but mere accusation is enough to be suspended at eNom / NameCheap.

http://www.namepros.com/warnings-and...ins-based.html

And while it's easy to dismiss such suspensions as one-offs, see page 2 of that above thread and the link below - domain registrars are under pressure by the U.S. White House administration to voluntarily suspend domains for numerous reasons.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ng-sites.shtml

Ron

holy fuck

this calls for another american flag

http://www.liberty-flag.com/images/p...ericanflag.jpg

pirx 10-05-2010 12:07 AM

All illegal to die

fris 10-05-2010 12:08 AM

serves them right

madawgz 10-05-2010 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17571921)
serves them right

so i guess google.com should be next on the seize list.

PXN 10-05-2010 12:24 AM

good then they can seize all the other file sharing site and tube site. That'll make SteveLightspeed job easier.

Mr. Cool Ice 10-05-2010 12:40 AM

The USA does whatever she wants.

Close the thread.

madawgz 10-05-2010 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Cool Ice (Post 17572004)
The USA does whatever she wants.

Close the thread.

they keep pushing and pushing...

GatorB 10-05-2010 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz (Post 17572282)
they keep pushing and pushing...

Pushing what? Enforcing laws? Or perhaps you are FOR copyright infringment? As I said if you take a friend that wants some pot and introduce him to a pot dealer then leave. Even though you had nothing to do with the actual drug transaction you can be arrested. How is this different?

BlackCrayon 10-05-2010 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572303)
Pushing what? Enforcing laws? Or perhaps you are FOR copyright infringment? As I said if you take a friend that wants some pot and introduce him to a pot dealer then leave. Even though you had nothing to do with the actual drug transaction you can be arrested. How is this different?

wouldn't google be guilty of this as well then?

GatorB 10-05-2010 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17572598)
wouldn't google be guilty of this as well then?

Google doesn't link to files. That would be like the phone book company liable for listing the number of guy who turns out to be a child molester.

BlackCrayon 10-05-2010 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572618)
Google doesn't link to files. That would be like the phone book company liable for listing the number of guy who turns out to be a child molester.

they often directly list megaupload/mediafire links which would be just as direct as if they were listed on a website.

georgeyw 10-05-2010 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572618)
Google doesn't link to files. That would be like the phone book company liable for listing the number of guy who turns out to be a child molester.

Google does link to files - try it for yourself.

Bing is a great tube site too

Sly 10-05-2010 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17572624)
they often directly list megaupload/mediafire links which would be just as direct as if they were listed on a website.

They list "illegal" sites and material based on their algorithm but it is not something that they specialize in and purposely seek out to do. Nobody is sitting behind a desk at Google saying "how can we give copyright materials to the masses for free?" Whereas some of these other sites...

Intent can be the difference between a tragic car accident and murder.

Ethersync 10-05-2010 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572618)
Google doesn't link to files. That would be like the phone book company liable for listing the number of guy who turns out to be a child molester.

Google does link to files and tons of porn, much illegal, in their image search as well.

Here are 1.6 million Hotfile links in Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site:hotfile.com/dl

Here are 2.6 million Fileserve links in Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site:...serve.com/file

BlackCrayon 10-05-2010 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 17572640)
They list "illegal" sites and material based on their algorithm but it is not something that they specialize in and purposely seek out to do. Nobody is sitting behind a desk at Google saying "how can we give copyright materials to the masses for free?" Whereas some of these other sites...

Intent can be the difference between a tragic car accident and murder.

that may fly because they are the almighty google but it sure as hell wouldn't for people like myself or you. these guys running these file sharing search engines aren't purposely trying to get stuff to people for free. they just know tons of people are searching for this stuff but they would be better off to just use a bunch of fake links.

madawgz 10-05-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17572598)
wouldn't google be guilty of this as well then?

thats what i was going to say

Phoenix 10-05-2010 11:53 AM

seems the usa...and companies within it...are free to rape and pillage anywhere they want in the world

too bad i got involved in porn...id love to get into politics

ottopottomouse 10-05-2010 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572618)
Google doesn't link to files

Course they do.

itx 10-05-2010 12:03 PM

Yes they can better use a domain registrar outside USA.

MetaMan 10-05-2010 12:05 PM

Lobbyists and politicains until you have both in your pocket you always have a risk of losing your business. People always say "illegal illegal" and im not for copyright infringement but when you allow the government to deem more and more things illegal they will do just that.

as they push more laws in they force more control on the population for the people who pad their pockets.

never forget anything can be made illegal. i am not in agreeance with government pushing more and more controlling laws on the population and governments pushing it on the world.

BFT3K 10-05-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 17574100)
too bad i got involved in porn...id love to get into politics

Problem is people with morals don't do well in politics - it's much too cut-throat and dirty.

The reality is, porn is the cleaner business to be in BY FAR!

EZRhino 10-05-2010 12:09 PM

Thats some fucked up shit.

madawgz 10-05-2010 12:40 PM

it probably took the guy quite some time to put the site together

and he lost his monthly revenue when it was seized, probably over 1000 dollars a day!

madawgz 10-05-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itx (Post 17574143)
Yes they can better use a domain registrar outside USA.

even if you register outside the states

.com, .net, .org and .us are still under the usa's laws

correct me if im wrong?

Nasty 10-05-2010 01:30 PM

I'm surprised they didn't take it over and keep it open to collect info on users

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz (Post 17571884)
Let me get this clear,

if you have a domain name, .com, .net, .org or if the registrar you have is based in the good ol' USA they can seize your domain name without warning or court decision?

for example this was an alexa top 1000 website

http://www.filespump.com/

and it was seized because they deemed it to be illegal

Filespump only had a crawler to gather links from megaupload, rapidshare etc and put those links in their search engine, the site didnt host anything.


MediaGuy 11-28-2010 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17572303)
Pushing what? Enforcing laws? Or perhaps you are FOR copyright infringment? As I said if you take a friend that wants some pot and introduce him to a pot dealer then leave. Even though you had nothing to do with the actual drug transaction you can be arrested. How is this different?

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17571890)
Let me ask you this, if all yo did was hook up drug dealers and drug users but you never sold any drugs could you be arrested? Yes.

You would still have to go before a judge before you fined or threw the "offender" in jail. You would have to be "arrested". What DHS did was seize first and investigate after (some of those sites are back online now).

Oh, and...

WHAT the fuck does the US Department of Homeland Security have to do with copyright infringement, file sharing or anything other than so-called terrorist threats?!?!?!?!?!?

:D

MediaGuy 11-28-2010 07:52 AM

Sign this: http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/

:D

just a punk 11-28-2010 07:58 AM

Somebody please tell the feds about http://pornolab.net/!!!

datatank 11-28-2010 08:14 AM

it does not matter where your registar is located

salvo visalli 11-28-2010 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17571890)
Let me ask you this, if all yo did was hook up drug dealers and drug users but you never sold any drugs could you be arrested? Yes.

the same here...:thumbsup

salvo visalli 11-28-2010 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz (Post 17571950)
so i guess google.com should be next on the seize list.

hope so...

izzynew 11-28-2010 08:47 AM

So the us government can seize any domain name?
In a word Yes.

Elliot Caine 11-28-2010 09:00 AM

What justification to bit torrent/file sharing users have? They always say freedom is at stake, but for a soon to be content provider, I'm extremely happy they are finally doing something about it.


I knew it was coming. The music industry has been cut nearly in half since early 2000 from pirating. There are much larger interests than porn at stake here but I'm happy we are all going to benefit as well.

Barry-xlovecam 11-28-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17572598)
wouldn't google be guilty of this as well then?

Google search or images contains some results to/of infringing content but this is incidental to its main function of indexing. Goggle does remove infringing indexing when notified. In short, Google has safe harbor.


The word seize means to arrest. Due process would apply to recover the domain. The US has no jurisdiction outside of its borders generally. However, the domain's DNS can be blocked in ISP look ups on US soil.

VGeorgie 11-28-2010 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MediaGuy (Post 17733164)
WHAT the fuck does the US Department of Homeland Security have to do with copyright infringement, file sharing or anything other than so-called terrorist threats?!?!?!?!?!?

The US Customs department has always had jurisdiction over counterfeit goods and pirated material entering the country or circulating within the country. Since 2003 they've been a part of Department of Homeland Security, so naturally DHS now has jurisdiction.

Not rocket science, and it's hardly as if they keep this stuff a secret.

andrej_NDC 11-28-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datatank (Post 17733182)
it does not matter where your registar is located

Not true, US government can only seize domains that belong to them, .com, etc. And yes, they can do whatever they want with no valid reason or explanation whatsoever, because of the patriot act.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123