Ron Paul spam of a different sort
 

http://emptv.com/view/ron-paul-doesn...e-your-support

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/articl...71213042357547

Things you should consider before hoping on the Ron Paul bandwagon

:thumbsup

He's also said that just because he may have an opinion or stance on an issue, it doesn't mean he would move to put it into action in government. He just wants to move the power to the states and let them figure their own state laws out for themselves, whether they go with his stance or not.

That article sucks, first of all they dont understand half of his positions and are wrong about the assumptions on many outcomes if something they say is bad did happen. Its good to have states rights and its bad to have the federal government involved in stem cell research.

So what. He has flaws. They all do. The only perfect candidate is me. But I am not running (not this year, anyway). Given the choices we have, he is FAR AND AWAY the best candidate for the job. The guy is a Libertarian. He ran on our ticket and is now running as a Republican because the stupid sheep in this country will not vote for anyone who doesn't have a D or an R behind their name.

Ron is what this country needs. I have never supported a Republican for president in my entire life. But if he gets on the ticket, I will join his campaign and put every ounce of strength into it I can.

Yes, Ron will get rid of the EPA. He will replace it with laws that leave companies wide open to massive lawsuits if they pollute the land or air around them. Thats BETTER than what we have with the EPA now, because the EPA limits the liability of the companies as well as lets them pollute to a point.

Do you honestly give a fuck if he supports gay marriage or not? Seriously...who cares lol

WTF? I missed too much. Who stole this guys user/pass? I must have read you wrong.


And to the bill orielly employee that posted that garbage written by a pimple face college student :321GFY

Nobody is buying it.

Do you really want the states to decide the future of certain things? Say for example.. oh.. I don't know... the porn industry perhaps? Do you really think if left completely in the hands of the states they would allow our industy to continue unchallenged?

thats how America was intended dumb ass. Let me explain how its better for the simple minded.

if you didnt like the laws in one state you can move to another that fits your needs and beliefs. Under the current system the federal goverment sits in Washington and take money from the highest bidder (special interests & extreme evangelicals) and the whole country has to go by what they say. How does one entity get to tell everyone how to live in every part of the country? Do you think that makes us a free country? More and more the federal goverment is tell us what to eat, drink, and ingest into our own bodies which is unconstitutional period. I could go on for days about why one city having a monopoly on our goverment and our land is no good.

The corruption magically disappears when power is shifted to the states?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
And that will also magically disappear?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Fuck Yeah! Fuck that "..With liberty and justice for all" Shit! Want freedoms other states enjoy? Shop around for your freedoms motherfucker!
.

the euro union get more organized the US falls apart :)

i concour

lol.. whats up with all the obsessed Ron Paul bashers around here..? They are certainly dedicated and frankly pathetic...

Btw, heres a good one from one of your links.. they blame Ron Paul for saying yes to this question in a debate..

"Would you bring abstinence-education funding onto equal ground with contraceptive-based education?"

..but then gets blamed again for being against federal funding for contraceptive-based education.. lol

Looks like if he had his way, it would be 0 for both.. :2 cents:

centralisation of power certainly facilitate corruption for your information...

I thought he was for getting the feds out of education totally? He did have his way.. and he voted FOR federal involvement when it clicked with his Fundamental Christian Beliefs. What's with him funding education with federal money?

What does shifting power to the states do for eliminating corruption? Nothing.

can you give an exemple ?

damn you are dumb

Yup!
Also:

Just when I was starting to like you. Seriously though, vote for either Guliani or Clinton. They are the real saviors of our country and we should follow blindly. Seriously.

eliminating? no.. but the fact remains, the fewer is the number of those making the decisions, the easier it is to corrupt the bunch..

didnt you read my post? If Paul wont fund contraceptive-based education.. how much then would the federal funding of abstinance education be if its equal to the other? lol

So putting power in the hands of 50 state governments = less people to corrupt? I, for some reason, believe your math is flawed.

You're only kidding yourself if you think big money wont just be shifted from the federal to the state level. Corruption is just as bad at the state level. Let's add more money and less federal oversight and see what we end up with shall we?:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Point being he is supposed to be for removing the federal government from education right? How does voting for federal funding for any aspect of it accomplish that exactly?

Also pay close attention to his earmarks:
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/interactive/all...tx.14.paul.pdf

What's with him getting pork barrel money for the university of texas? He wants the feds out of state education, but spending federal money on it is just fine?

lol.. uh.. yeah.. lets say theres 5 people at the top of a country... quite easy to corrupt..
if theres 5 at the top of 50 states... sure... many states may have corrupt leaders.. but what are the chances that happen in 50 states?

Fucking A, you and I agree about something for once. :Oh crap

Please don't. I would hate for anyone to think we were "bro's."

I think Paul responded to that quite well in his meet the press interview

It doesn't fucking matter what it does or doesn't do. The federal government is for raising a national defense and protecting, upholding, enforcing and defending the constitution. Thats it. Its not for providing food for the homeless, planning your retirement, schooling your kids, building highways or any of the zillions of other things it does that it has no business doing. The federal government of today, for the most part, exists in violation of the law.

As far as who I will vote for, I can't vote for Paul as I am a registered Democrat. As a Democrat I will vote for someone I think can win the presidency.

Fixed:thumbsup

You are a tricky one.

I doubt anyone will be able to vote for Paul in any meaningful or official way.

He most likely wont make it that far into the race.

I was being nice and trying to make a point that paultards do not seem to understand. I guess they just don't get it.

mali 4 prez 2008 bring 'tucky life to the masses

The republicans are in trouble if Gulliani, Romney, or Huckabee get to the big dance. The democrats could run a mexican illegal alien over them losers. Even the Evangelicals cant figure out which one to back.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS! :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Obama :thumbsup:thumbsup

Quite the opposite, it is you who dont "get it" and you will see in less than 2 weeks.

As a Democrat I will vote for someone I think can win the presidency.