![]() |
This car is faster then any GFY'ers Car and it's under $83,000
|
I love your sig. Such nice boobies.
|
Sweet fuckin Vette...nice
|
Damn that c6 has 1000hp!
|
testing
ignore... |
Hot ride for sure.
|
Sweet Ride.
|
nice rides :thumbsup
|
I dont agree
|
Quote:
|
Too bad it's a Corvette :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
It will also cost you ungodly amounts to service one |
Looks pretty darn hot too.
|
Eva and I have just bought new cars.
I looked at the Saabs, Audis, Mercs and more of the more expensive cars Even thought about buying a Jaguar, which was nice and the only one I seriously considered. But in the end it's only a car to go from A to B. Ended up with a Ford. Just can't justify spending $50,000 on transport. |
why>>>???
|
Trappin a buck 49 on 1Kwhp? Hmm... not bad, but I'd expect a lot more out of that thing with that much displacement and 67mm turbos. 1200whp at least. Probably tuned for longevity though. And "streetable" and "methanol" don't mix hahah. Looks like a pretty nice car though.
|
Quote:
have you ever seen service bills on high end cars? all of them are ungodly. |
_________________
|
No matter how fast it is, it's a Corvette - which are a dime a dozen.
|
for about 15K i think a box stock kawasaki zx-14 would smoke that.
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wonder if those are street legal in the US |
Quote:
|
it looks really nice :)
|
those things are insane
|
their hot
|
Quote:
|
its not under $83.000 here (thanks to our stupid tax and its shitty 7 liter engine) so...you are wrong...
btw you do understand a car is alot more than going for a to b rigth? |
Quote:
|
Edit: Just noticed this is the Z06 tunned rather than the 2006 Z06...so in other words: quite a crappy car you have there...
I should had know it wasn't stock (coming from you)... |
Quote:
When I still lived in London, I resented owning any car, since I only drove at weekends and that only occasionally. The solution was to buy a "classic" which - depending on what you buy - offers several ways to save money: no road tax on anything more than 25 years old (it was then, now it's pre-1973 I believe); lots of insurance companies will give you full cover on cars over 15 years old for as little as 75 stirling a year (so long as you can live with a 5,000 mile per year cap); and if you buy carefully, little or no depreciation, often a profit. When I was younger, a real classic (read vintage) involved a lot of cash and hassles over reliability and maintenance. But since you mentioned Jaguar, at least until 10 years ago you could find low-mileage, as-new series2 XJ6/12s (my favorite ride) for 8K-12K. Come to that, RR Shadows were only around 15K then. In other words, nowadays you can buy quite a lot of really nice more-or-less "modern" rides without a major cash layout or special ownership problems. Otherwise I would agree about Fords. I have owned a Zodiac, a couple of Granadas and a Scorpio (a great shame they screwed themselves with that "frog-eyed" design and dropped out of that end of the market). One of the cars I wish I had kept was a supercharged RS Capri which could see off a 911 Turbo without any effort at all, and I had all the XR range at one time or another :) |
:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
Mr. Romance |
nice cars
|
Quote:
|
I'll make few more sales this week and it wil be mine :1orglaugh
|
On a straight line it would indeed go faster than a lot of cars. Put it on a track with corners and shit, this thing will be owned by low end supercars very easily. This car has leaf suspensions for crying out loud:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
good luck finding someone who paid $100k+ more for a different car to admit that this is a better performance machine though :1orglaugh |
but they are ugly
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123