GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   GOOGLE is banning linkex ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=912225)

GAMEFINEST 06-23-2009 05:54 PM

GOOGLE is banning linkex ?
 
From what I heard, linkex is on googles ban list?

collegeboobies 06-23-2009 06:01 PM

Sucks what other programs are? At least wordpress is not.

SBJ 06-23-2009 06:04 PM

damn first smart thumbs and now this.. This sucks! :(

Si 06-23-2009 06:13 PM

that was obviously coming.

fris 06-23-2009 06:29 PM

good linkex is garbage

HorseShit 06-23-2009 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 15990867)
good linkex is garbage

I was thinking the same thing lol

d-null 06-23-2009 06:40 PM

shouldn't google be drastically discounting site wide linking value overall?

seems 99% of sitewide linking is done to manipulate

Supz 06-23-2009 06:43 PM

they are doing some heavy cracking down

jscott 06-23-2009 06:46 PM

I hope so :) that would fucking ROCK!!!! I always felt those mass submitter tools, linkex, and all that shit that allows cutting corners would catch up and help out us hard working negros someday :)

Miguel T 06-23-2009 06:47 PM

Good for me that I dont use ST neigher Linkex! :D

Darkhorse 06-23-2009 06:52 PM

Stopped using Linkex months ago as heard this was happening then, most part Linkex is just crap anyway.....

cherrylula 06-23-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 15990893)
I hope so :) that would fucking ROCK!!!! I always felt those mass submitter tools, linkex, and all that shit that allows cutting corners would catch up and help out us hard working negros someday :)

:1orglaugh

mynameisjim 06-23-2009 06:58 PM

I haven't seen anything but I haven't been checking. But I never ran linkex from day one. I knew the day would come when it would get pinched by google either on purpose or by accident.

FlexxAeon 06-23-2009 07:00 PM

stopped using it a while ago. it's still on some of my older sites but i've long since masked it and hidden it from links/bots

i was getting SE hits daily for the term "linkex" that shit just didn't sit well with me

go go thnderball

2012 06-23-2009 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlexxAeon (Post 15990927)
go go thnderball

until they send in the cleaner ...

http://i42.tinypic.com/xlf9t1.jpg

Overload 06-23-2009 07:08 PM

if true ... more than welcome :)

d-null 06-23-2009 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlexxAeon (Post 15990927)
stopped using it a while ago. it's still on some of my older sites but i've long since masked it and hidden it from links/bots

i was getting SE hits daily for the term "linkex" that shit just didn't sit well with me

go go thnderball

I'm getting so paranoid I'm starting to go away from the whole idea of "blogroll" or "friends" type of linking, especially when it is sitewide, deep inlinks from a single page within a site has to be the best most realistic natural confidence vote out there, just wondering when google will move more and more in that direction?

Nicky 06-23-2009 07:11 PM

Good, had it on a few blogs but never liked it.

FlexxAeon 06-23-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15990957)
I'm getting so paranoid I'm starting to go away from the whole idea of "blogroll" or "friends" type of linking, especially when it is sitewide, deep inlinks from a single page within a site has to be the best most realistic natural confidence vote out there, just wondering when google will move more and more in that direction?

i dunno blogrolls in general are a staple now thanks to wordpress and the like. and we all know google hearts wordpress. seems more reasonable that they'd target the blatant "auto-pilot" usage or linking to someone.

st0ned 06-23-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 15990867)
good linkex is garbage

Agreed, I never understood why people used that crap.

Socks 06-23-2009 07:34 PM

Any proof of this?

Nicky 06-23-2009 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15990957)
deep inlinks from a single page within a site has to be the best most realistic natural confidence vote out there, just wondering when google will move more and more in that direction?

This is why people trading hardlinks with their blogs should trade within posts instead.

TeenSluts 06-23-2009 09:12 PM

I never liked linkex. if anyone wants to do some real link trades with my blogs... send me an email :)

Brujah 06-23-2009 09:47 PM

If this is true, quit using Google for your own searches, and recommend others visiting your sites stop using them too. Start using Bing.com instead.

dav3 06-23-2009 09:57 PM

Bing!!!!

Iron Fist 06-23-2009 10:06 PM

I think im going to get rid of hardlinks on all my sites... just interink within myself for hardlinks from now on... just too much work to keep having to check links for cheaters.

sexygirls 06-23-2009 10:34 PM

Bad news for the linkex users

d-null 06-23-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlexxAeon (Post 15991007)
i dunno blogrolls in general are a staple now thanks to wordpress and the like. and we all know google hearts wordpress. seems more reasonable that they'd target the blatant "auto-pilot" usage or linking to someone.

yes, I don't think the blogrolls and sitewide links will invite any actual penalty or banning, I just think that they will likely lose most of their value

Barefootsies 06-23-2009 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 15990957)
I'm getting so paranoid I'm starting to go away from the whole idea of "blogroll" or "friends" type of linking, especially when it is sitewide, deep inlinks from a single page within a site has to be the best most realistic natural confidence vote out there, just wondering when google will move more and more in that direction?


d-null 06-23-2009 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15991341)

I feel disturbed about the whole thing, it is like not knowing which way to proceed.....:upsidedow

GAMEFINEST 06-23-2009 11:10 PM

I sense it not happening, but you never know ..

EthnicLover 06-23-2009 11:22 PM

Not one shred of proof in this entire thread.

Where's the proof?!?

Matt 26z 06-23-2009 11:33 PM

Google needs to be investigated by the FTC.

It really seems as if they are trying to squash any form of traffic buying and trading that doesn't involve doing it though AdWords.

First they ban any site selling hard links and state that if you want to sell links, fine, they just won't include you in their search engine anymore.

Now they appear to be going after scripts that make link trading possible.

VikingStar 06-23-2009 11:42 PM

ok......

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 06-23-2009 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 15990867)
good linkex is garbage

linkex is awesome

and no it's not banned in GOOGLE

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 06-23-2009 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st0ned (Post 15991011)
Agreed, I never understood why people used that crap.

ok, so lets hear why it's crap?

Elixir 06-24-2009 01:23 AM

FUCK you GOOGLE !!!!!!!!

Denny 06-24-2009 01:42 AM

I don't use linkex, but that sucks!! :disgust

NinjaSteve 06-24-2009 02:06 AM

Is there proof of this?

dav3 06-24-2009 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 15991417)
Google needs to be investigated by the FTC.

It really seems as if they are trying to squash any form of traffic buying and trading that doesn't involve doing it though AdWords.

First they ban any site selling hard links and state that if you want to sell links, fine, they just won't include you in their search engine anymore.

Now they appear to be going after scripts that make link trading possible.

If there is any truth to a linkex banning, it does seem that godgle is getting a little carried away with itself.

But honestly, I'm going to have to call bullshit on this linkex banning. I have linkex on one site and it's G traffic is currently growing. *knocks on wood*


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123