Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill
 

...

for my site www.no-lolitas.com (alternativ: www.teenchubbys.com )


THIS SITE IS IN NO WAY USED OR MENT TO ATTRACT THE UNDERAGE AUDIENCE Its just a fucking sitename.There are no lolita /underage keywords or something.

But Ccbill refuses to allow this site for processing.

I even offered them to remove all HTML traces(filenames, url etc) for the word Lolita as long as i can leave the logo pictures as they are ( so it would be impossible to find this site using SE for the term lolita in any way)


So any CCProcessor around that is a little bit felxible?


Clearance: I completly understand and support the default blacklisting of the term "lolita" but as i said in my case its a clearly visible anti lolita sitename and just! a sitename (without any searchable trace for that term or use of that term in any text)

What a fucking joke --- why didn't you just call your site "Child-porn-not-here.com"

From the text on your site:
"Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?"

Think the search engines won't see "skinny, 12 year old looking lolita"???

Because it´s the goddamn concept of the site.

I could have it named anti-skinny-and-anti-young-looking-models-site.com but for some reason i thought that wouldn´t be a good domain ...


or how would you name a project that is dedicated against the flood of skinny-schoolgirl looking model sites?

"Click here if you DON'T not want this" --- gets a little confusing doesn't it?

I call bullshit.

Steve Lightspeed

If you don´t like fat girls .. wouldn´t it be obvious to first visit the site www.no-fats.com ?

maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

:2 cents:

Well, uhm, err.. I'd suggest spinning it a different way.

You have got to be kidding?!?!?!?!

http://www.alleybucks.com/promo/lolboyalley.gif

You seem to have "www.teenchubbys.com" already, so why are you fighting to keep the lolita name AT ALL?

To blame CCbill for not wanting to touch this is really fucked up on YOUR PART. CCbill should be commended for it. :thumbsup

yes teenchubbys is mine too but is not that remarkable as no-lolitas
Its because i would have the whole design to be changed again. Headers/banners/gallerys/buttons.....

With that definition the domain " no-legal-age-models.com" would go through the process but no-lolitas doesn´t ?


don´t want to fuck with anyone here but it fucking sucks when you have everything done and ready and no problems whatsover with anything and then the processor declines you because some graphics INCLUDE a badword(INA A NEGATIVE WAY)?

Maybe you should have learned the rules before you played the paysite game?

Out of curiosity, is English your primary language?

When you saw "lolita" you should have been brilliant enough to ASK before spending the money to build the site.

or maybe the designer should have said something

Looks like the "rules" are to look at a blacklist and you´re done..

That´s what i am complaining about!

Where is the flexibility?

When someone would add the site " www.no-model-is-of-legal-age.com it would perfectly pass the blacklist test even if that name would be damn worse..

obviously not :winkwink:

gibs auf :2 cents:

scheissdreck verfluchter :-P

There is absolutely no need for "flexibility" in their regard. Where is your "flexibility"?

Nobody wants unnecessary heat. You're creating unnecessary heat. Nobody in the US is going to process you, Visa would laugh.

Why would you bother to build your site around a term that every reputable processor attempts to stay 10-feet away from? It's certainly not like that's a new policy that any of them have....

And I highly doubt that the domain "no-legal-age-models.com" would be considered acceptable -- it's all about the connotations, and that one just raises red flags all around.

I'm starting a new site, www.no-scat.com

Anybody up for partnership?

ich weiß :winkwink:

aber keiner wird dein konzept als solches akzeptieren. das wort "lolita" allein ist das problem - weil die auchmaschinen darauf anspringen. auch wenn du es genau andersrum meinst. und da alle seiten von visa gecheckt werden, kann auch ccbill nix machen - selbst wenn die wollten.

die andere domain ist doch prima - musst nur den header umbauen


PS: ich hätte noch passenden content für dich - ;)))

"No-lolitas", worst name ever. Change the name.

:mad: :angrysoap :boid :waaaaahh :feels-hot :Grrrrrr :ak47: :BangBang: :censored



enough now. close that i erase that fucking term :banana

i really hope i will never have to read a comment again on Domain registrars or hosting companys that shut down sites because the models look underage because that is the same thing (playing with the fire ) like here ... hm no its even worse because that are real girls here its just a word but everybody greatly understands the anger of the owners of these "kiddy looking" sites. :Oh crap


some mod plz close here . everything is said



naja suchmaschiene würde nur die domain finden auf den seiten is ja nix was textliches was den namen erhält. naja was soll man machen. . wegen content meld ich mich mal ;)

Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"

no brain... und jetzt klappe zu :-P

how about:

no-I-never-get-processed.com

lol

Just drop $8 for a new domain and move on ... Processors are anal about this kind of thing. www.cardsgate.com Im sure would process it ...

this is a joke right?

teenchubbys sounds much better. don't like ccbill policies, try another processor. but i don't think any are gonna touch a site with 'lolitas' in the domain. bad idea on your part.

I'm fucking hoping it is otherwise something is very wrong.

The fact that you have "no" before lolita means shit. You still have that in your domain and site title and other text on the site so that means that you will attract the sickos. Get it now? Didn't think so.

Let me ask you this. Why in the fuck did you think that this was a good name? Did you think that it would be like you taking a stand? Like you saying "I don't deal with or approve of underage girls so I will use lolita in my domain name and put no in front of it". Where's the sense in that? I can guarantee that IF you were to get processing for this site and it was live you would have people watching you and also keeping an eye on the processor. They don't care that you may not have "no lolitas" on the site. It's all in the name and the way you are promoting it.

for example

"Ever searched for some "hot teens" on the web and all you found were these skinny, 12 year old looking lolita-imitates?And then you searched for something "more"... some curves,some big ass,something chubby...you get these disgusting fat, ugly bitches? We decided to stop this mess and bring you the girls you want when you look for chubby girls!"

What the fuck were you thinking????

DUH???

I just grabbed a load of "no kiddie porn" sites - gotta be a winner :(

"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

give the guy a break - i think he's got it by now :upsidedow

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

i know one person who thinks like that
http://www.wjactv.com/2006/1116/10339092_240X180.jpg

if that was true he would have removed the text mentioned in this thread from the site.

now that takes the fucking cake.

This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???