GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Need a CCProcessor that is not bitching around like CCbill (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=688718)

cess 12-20-2006 09:35 PM

lol...... thanks i needed a good laugh.

Yngwie 12-20-2006 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11562100)
This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???


that's a very good question. I know that if I was a sponsor I would not accept traffic from there. May be good traffic, but it's not worth the heat it can bring.

Barefootsies 12-21-2006 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11561626)
I call bullshit.

Steve Lightspeed

If I find out you did this...


....I'm going to get you.

<puts on shades>

Barefootsies 12-21-2006 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 11561630)
maybe your intentions were good - but the result is stupid. ccbill is completely right and no other processor will touch it either

:2 cents:

Correct.

Anyone with any sense knows not to use banned words on their site. Much less in a domain name.

:disgust

Barefootsies 12-21-2006 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11561705)
Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"


bizarredollars 12-21-2006 06:57 AM

I'm not going to get into a fucking argument here.. just change the damn site name, and ccbill will process it.. Nothing wrong with using teenchubby's.

bizarredollars 12-21-2006 07:00 AM

We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.

www.verotel.com
www.365billing.com
www.segpay.com
www.standardpay.com

Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.

bizarredollars 12-21-2006 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11562100)
This begs the question, if the word is so taboo, why do most sponsors turn a blind eye to www.lolitampegs.com ???

I would not take traffic from that domain.

KGucci 12-21-2006 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizarredollars (Post 11563563)
We all know using lolita in a site name is a no-no, and has been for a long time... if ccbill have blacklisted you, try one of the following.. they all have the same rules when it comes to blacklisted words however.


www.segpay.com


Whatever, lolita in your site name will cause nothing but trouble.. concept or not, it rings alarm bells.. I did not even take a look at the site, because of that word.

You are correct! There is no processor that will accept such a site. If you do find one, please post it in this thread so webmasters can stay clear of them.

If anyone has any questions regarding SegPay.com, please feel free to contact me directly.

corvette 12-21-2006 09:00 AM

Missed this thread until now, cant see the site because it appears to no longer be a site, teenchubbys.com is down as well ?


Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11562052)
"All girls on this site are older than 13 year olds, 14 year olds, 15 year olds, 16 year olds, AND 17year olds...."

i hope steve was joking about this?


We are not flexible in the least with issues that affect our relationship with our banks, looks like the other posters in this thread explained that to you

Klen 12-21-2006 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11561705)
Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"

And there is NO money in porn hehe

Vigilante 12-21-2006 10:07 AM

1) I will change the site name
2) no there were never in any way any models on that page that would fit the term"lolita" or underage
3) i am confused how a single word can lead to so much trouble... same with the word Hitler over here... :upsidedow


enough now . everything solved.

Yngwie 12-21-2006 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante (Post 11564314)
1) I will change the site name
2) no there were never in any way any models on that page that would fit the term"lolita" or underage
3) i am confused how a single word can lead to so much trouble... same with the word Hitler over here... :upsidedow


enough now . everything solved.

it's a good thing everything is solved. As for a single word leading to so much trouble. It's a VERY dangerous word to use no matter if you do or don't have what the word means.

DutchTeenCash 12-21-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vigilante (Post 11564314)
3) i am confused how a single word can lead to so much trouble... same with the word Hitler over here... :upsidedow

Dude seriously - just leave

Fucking myself 12-21-2006 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 11561705)
Now that I think about it, I think you could really go far with the whole "anti" theme:

no-hot-chicks.com
no-quality.com
no-value.com

and your program could be called

not-profitable.com

and your marketing pitch can be "NO sales, NO rebills, and NO ethics!"



:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123