A nice Picture of George Bush
 

http://photomatt.net/dropbox/2004/04/bush-front.jpg

"President George Bush done in mosaic using pictures of the dead American soldiers sent to fight the war in Iraq"

when he'll win the elections there will be pics for the rest of the body

wonder what kind of mad picture analyse methods was used to create that pic..

creative

there's couple of programs that can do this..

the title is "War President"

That's really saddening. :(

Matt

Very creative it realy took time to make that thing but it's kinda sad:(

you could probably make a novel with the pictures of the people who died at the hands of saddam and osama.... a couple novels thick of mosaics..

I found some software with google yesterday and posted links. It is called photomosaics

I bet the bushes killed more.

That picture carry alot of meaning for the president and for the soldiers.

kmanrox:

When you take into account the *real* numbers of dead - not just US soldiers - who died as a result of Bush's "errors of judgement", Saddam may not be far behind, but Osama is not even in the picture.

Since the day that imbecile was chucked out of his mother's womb, Bush has been responsible for many human lives - even before playing President. Since then, on his orders, *around* 12,000-18,000 Iraq civilians have been killed in Iraq alone - forget Afghanistan (the popular thing to do about Afghanistan is "forget it") - there are enough faces in that to make a really nice full body picture of the village idiot.

Also consider adding all those who will die as a direct result of Bush's conduct - ie.. all who are/will suffer from the effects of depleted uranium in the "US wars". Currently the readings on this in Iraq are 1900 times higher than normal and reports of cancers/infant deformities have already risen dramatically. DR will not go away quick - people will died of this for many decades thanks to the "liberation" of Iraq.

It is safe to double the *actual* death toll of the war with the
"seconadary effects" of DR alone. When this affects/kills US soldiers, they discuss "syndromes". Why the fuck is the US govt unable to state an actual fact? These guys are dying because of depleted uranium poisoning - not some ephemism. The poor health status and death rate in US troops from this is astounding - It takes little brain to see the effects on civilians who will still be living in places affected by DR.

SO.... That nice work of art with a load of US soldiers who were unfortunate to have died serving Bush, is a totally unrealistic view of the real world. It is a US view which does not even get close to the real world and the effects of war.

But incredibly impressive.

not supposed 2 bring that up, this is a knock Bush thread.

stupid moron

got your tin foil hat on ??

even laura bush enjoys partaking in a nice murder...

I love thoses mosaics pics ... I wonder how they are made

did you read the fucking thread man?

thats very creative and nicely thought out

so after 9/11, Bush shouldnt have done a damn thing but sit around and get his dick sucked like Clinton did, then you fucking democrats wouldnt be bitching about it..

well you would actually, like total idiots you'd be bitching about Bush not doing anything after our Country was attacked.:321GFY

hehe, the amount of uneducated people that post on this board amuses me. BTW, welcome to 3 months ago....

OSAMA = Iraq? :helpme

i wonder if kerry took pics of the civilians he killed in the freefire zones. maybe we could make a picture out of their faces

When your a solider and in the middle of a war you do what you have to do to survive. The solider doesn't get to decide if the war is right or wrong. They are just sent and they do their jobs regardless........... It's called serving your country (Government)

so the soliders who tortured and photoed those iraq prisoners were onlying doing what they had to do? prisoners and old fisherman in boats are both defenseless.

didn'
t know iraqi soldiers attacked the states

i missed something on foxnews?

it's been well known for years that IRAQ funded and harbored terrorists, dont act like its something new.

and we invaded IRAQ because they refused to follow the rules of the UN, that were put in place over a decade ago....

I am talking about Kerry, show me proof that Kerry did any of that. Kerry actually come back from Vietnam and had the guts to complain about what he saw in the war.

This man believes in human rights........

he also believes that the things he said on camera during numerous interviews, were never said...

funny how that works, aint it... at least he's consistent I guess.:1orglaugh :Graucho

Bush refused to follow the rules of the UN too.... :1orglaugh

he listed off many things that happened there and then commented on how he took part in them. mention of taking part in freefirezones is pointless if he only attacked soliders. how about him admitting breaking many rules of the geneva convention? i guess you buy his ignorance excuse.

such as?

How about telling the UN to go fuck themselves when they said no to invading Iraq? :1orglaugh

so we should just sit back and let countires that are known for hardboring and funding terrorists, and a country that has had over 10 years to comply with UN rules, to just slide under the radar screen?

i'm proud that BUSH had the balls to go in with or without help, and maybe u also noticed, we weren't alone in doing so.

since when is that a rule? why the fuck do we even have governments and leaders? we have the un here to make decisions for the world. if they said no to invading afghanistan what would your thoughts of been on that?

Osama? you need to stop believing the propogander your goverment puts out

are you fucking serious?

"and we invaded IRAQ because they refused to follow the rules of the UN, that were put in place over a decade ago...."

Hypocrisy, IRAQ needs to listen to the UN but if the UN doesn't agree with Bush then he can tell those Nations to go fuck themselves?

UN never said no to invading Afghanistan and there is reason. "OSAMA took responsibility for 911 attacks"

"Iraq war wasn't justified, U.N. weapons experts say"

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/US/03/21/iraq.weapons/

of course the U.N.'s weapons instructors are gonna say what they wanna say... the UN didnt want the US to attack IRAQ, do you think the weapons inspectors are gonna say anything other than what the UN wants them to say?