Google Dictator Of The Century!
 

If we use word Dictator for Google then its the right word or some will use more bad word for them who wants to dictate internet sites the way want. If their revenue is going down for their drop in advertisements then we as adult Webmaster not responsible for that.

They start sending notifications for abusive experience ads to user and asking to remove all ads and pops because they don’t like it. If we didn’t remove then they putting enforcement on site and banning all ads and pop on sites to open nee window tabs. They giving 30 days notice to remove ads or face enforcement. They becoming internet police to dictate webmaster. They send traffic but not to all sites and if webmatsr remove ads and popup then how come the webmaster pay the site bill to host.....

Dont know how you people feel for them but situation is getting worst day by day... any othrr webmaster received notifications and what action taken so far please...

Thats how dictatorship works . . .

I took the thread title literally, and duly googled "Dictator of the century"...

Then I was confused as to why I didn't see any strange or weird results :2 cents:

You just need to cloack google bot and that's it.

Its the right word! :warning

Can you post the text of one of these notifications?

Edit: 247MG - Adult Indian Affiliate Program should be SSL, you might want to fix that.

Edit: I am thinking this might be what you're being hit with:

https://searchengineland.com/google-...ds-site-280970

If that's the case then simply clean up your site. Surfers don't want popups, popunders, unwanted redirects and other spammy shit.

Here you go

Google systems have detected abusive experiences on your site. To protect your site’s visitors, on Jan 7, 2019 Google Chrome will prevent the site from opening new windows or tabs, and will remove all ads, unless the issues are fixed.

Act now to fix the problem:

1
Identify the abusive experiences
Visit the Abusive Experiences Report to identify the violating experiences detected.
2
Remove the abusive experiences
Coordinate with your web development team to develop a strategy for addressing these issues.
3
Request a review
Once your site is free of abusive experiences, request a review. Include any details or documentation that can help us understand the changes made.

...

Ok that's what I thought it was.

This is simply fixed.

Get rid of popups and popunders.

Make sure there's no javascript on your page that will launch a pop up, new tab or pop under that a user hasn't explicitly clicked on and expects that pop up, pop under or new tab.

Make sure ads on your site comply with the Better Ads standards. You can read them here: https://www.betterads.org/standards/

Then submit your site for review and there should be no issue.

Apple will be implementing Better Ads standards in Safari from February.

Firefox will probably follow and Chrome definitely implements ad blocking for sites not meeting those standards which is why you got a warning.

https://searchengineland.com/google-...ds-site-280970

digital dictatorship

https://pics.me.me/google-fully-a-fu...e-21957263.png

Russians hate Google cause they can't hack it :1orglaugh

Google it is low level for Russian hackers :1orglaugh
https://media.giphy.com/media/Qjmp5vKEERPyw/giphy.gif

I went searching on other forums about people getting this notification. A whole lot of webmasters who use pops and interstitial ads are pretty upset :1orglaugh

We only using exoclick ads banner and pop but it seems that pop time is over and we have to comply with dictator. In contact with exoclick to sort this matter out but popup is not an option any more which mean paying server bills is hard next month

What happens if you use google friendly popunders like those exoclick provide?

I'm using popunders and get that warning too. Worst thing is I'm not sure the problem is only popunders or some other ad formats (for example - sticky, invideo, vast, push etc).

I have "google ad compliance" ON on all ads from Exoclick and still warning.

Push notification and sticky as far as i know are google compliant and no issue but it seems popups indeed and issue even with google ad compliance on at exoclick. But exoclick staff is helpful, you should consult with them. All ad brokers are very well aware of this issue but at this point only exo offering google compliant ads

No need to change stuff straight away after getting notification..... you can wait till last date and apply for review after chaging thing but issue is only 2 reviews before permanent ban or exforcement

There have been threads about this issue for months here lots of warning

Once again, if you cloak google bot/entities, then you can do whatever you want. Ah well, i guess i need to open special thread to explain how that works since i getting screwed by this as well-even tho i work as media buyer and not as webmaster anymore, if publisher lose traffic or remove pop then i lose too.

Now, where did I read that private companies can decide for themselves how to conduct their business?

The days of fucking over surfers are over if you want to remain indexed in search engines.

The Better Ads Standards exist because consumers (your customers) got so completely sick of being abused by ads that they installed ad blockers and blocked ALL ads, which is bad for all of us.

Clean up your act, if you can't make money from non intrusive ads then you don't deserve to be in business, it's better if you shut your site down.

Throwing popups, unwanted notifications, misleading redirects etc is all bad for business.

There's no such thing as a Google friendly pop under. Consumers don't want popunders.

The reason you get a warning is obvious, go back to your site and clean away anything obtrusive to the surfer experience.

Push notifications are only compliant if they relate to non advertising content on a page.

If you're getting away without warnings for popups and popunders now then that won't last long, read the Better Ads Standards and become compliant to avoid issues. Google isn't mucking about with this stuff, if you have two strikes you're out and it will be very hard to get back to displaying any ads at all if you get this wrong.

I would change now, Google is already becoming backlogged with review requests, can you imagine what it will be at 5 minutes to midnight? You might end up waiting weeks to be reviewed and have no ads displaying in Chrome in the meantime.

:thumbsup

Yep, it's been in the SEO and Search media for ages. I think some people have just stuck their head in the sand and hoped it would go away.

Cloaking hasn't worked for a long time, Google renders a whole page including html, js, css, etc. They know what you're doing.

Google dragged their feet on this for a long time before implementing these changes. They didn't do it because they wanted to. The reason it's happening is because unless the majority of publishers comply with a better ads experience then the number of people using adblockers will exceed the number of people not using them.

Unless publishers stop abusing surfers with things they don't want the number of adblocker installs will increase and advertising revenue will continue to decrease.

Logic dictates that blocking all ads in Chrome is only the beginning, next Google will probably start deindexing pages that don't comply. Bing will follow.

You're not free to do any business you want in Russia, but Google is a big bad American company so bad bad bad says your master Putin you stupid alt-right hate fake nic troll :321GFY

@AdultKing: Google say when your site under review by google till then no enforcement by Google. But site should go under review with in 30 days.

That applies now, not in February. If you wait until February your ads will be blocked even if your site is in review.

No, we will not wait till last date of enforcement. We will do a week before enforcement date.

That's your choice, my advice is do it now.

Our enforcement date is 10th Jan. so by 1st or 2nd it will be submitted for reveiw.... every thing is prepared and we known what need to be changed. Mostly the issue is with popunder and there is no exception we have to remove it. Its called thin or transparent background.

What does that have to do with anything? I thought we we're discussing google...:2 cents:

Everyone is a dictator one way or another..

The last thing i would do, is to ad my site to a fucking google tool like WM, to get the shit fixed.

I have a site with only one ad zone (exo pop 24 hours) still got blocked in Chrome.

If these crimes, would like to do something for bether ads, they sould start at their own adsens ad farms.

Meanwhile simple text links got blocked.

If Chrome user didnt make you money, block them.

Best Regards

:thumbsup

Nice in theory, trouble is all browsers will end up supporting the Better Ads Standard and blocking ALL ads on your site if you don't comply. Next logical step is to be deindexed from the major search engines.

Surfers don't want your popup.

I agree with google...popups are the equivalent of spam...why should google let you use their platform to steer THEIR users to your spam?...

So witch Ad format did they want?

In Player Ads ervery 20 seconds, Native Ad Clickbait Farms, Push Notifications non stop


Maybee i agree with the Popup but blocking traget blank Text Links to CB,
isnt a bit to much?

We used this freq 24 hours got blocked to.

This is what you need to comply with.

https://www.betterads.org/standards/

It's simple, easy and common sense. Don't abuse surfers with ads that give them unexpected results. For example JS redirects, or popunders, popups, interstitials etc.

When someone clicks on a link make sure the link just takes them to the linked site and doesn't do anything else.

It's very simple, logical. Think of yourself looking at websites, just don't do the stuff you hate.

I use the official CB revshare code, via text link!

Can you post a html example?

<div align="center">
<a href="https://chaturbate.com/in/?track=default&tour=3Mc9&campaign=nxkyR&redirect_t o_room=-welcomepage-&mobileRedirect=always" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
<font size="7" face="Courier New" color="#FFFFFF"><b><u>Text</u></b></font>
</a>
</div>

To what you reffer is old school cloaking which indeed does not working for long time, but new methods working perfectly fine.