GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Google Dictator Of The Century! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1307375)

AdultKing 12-31-2018 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beaver1 (Post 22388846)
<div align="center">
<a href="https://chaturbate.com/in/?track=default&tour=3Mc9&campaign=nxkyR&redirect_t o_room=-welcomepage-&mobileRedirect=always" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
<font size="7" face="Courier New" color="#FFFFFF"><b><u>Text</u></b></font>
</a>
</div>

There's two things you can do here. Create a short url for the target url and link to that or better still, get Chaturbate to come into the 21st century and don't do mobile redirects.

An affiliate link by itself shouldn't cause issues with the better ads standards, but if you have other stuff going on like popups or popunders then they will probably flag affiliate links as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22388848)
To what you reffer is old school cloaking which indeed does not working for long time, but new methods working perfectly fine.

Until a human reviewer flags your site and then you're screwed. Nobody can outsmart Google in the end. You might get away with something for a while but when Google catch on you're in strife.

Beaver1 12-31-2018 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388849)
There's two things you can do here. Create a short url for the target url and link to that or better still, get Chaturbate to come into the 21st century and don't do mobile redirects.

An affiliate link by itself shouldn't cause issues with the better ads standards, but if you have other stuff going on like popups or popunders then they will probably flag affiliate links as well.



Until a human reviewer flags your site and then you're screwed.

Problem solved via traget self.

Klen 12-31-2018 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388849)


Until a human reviewer flags your site and then you're screwed. Nobody can outsmart Google in the end. You might get away with something for a while but when Google catch on you're in strife.

I can :1orglaugh Well, i suppose i should go back to webmastering just to prove how google can be outsmarted.

3xmedia 12-31-2018 04:56 AM

Yep, lots of cloaked sites in Google's SERPs, including image search, some are there for pretty long time... this is what they should fix, including their fucking new Gmail that is still slow as fuck and almost useless... this should not be their job to dictate webmasters what kind of ads are fine and what are not for surfers... surfers that don't like popups can install popup blockers. surfers also don't like their fucking misleading adwords ads, ads in Youtube videos etc... hope this shit will be blocked too.

AdultKing 12-31-2018 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3xmedia (Post 22388858)
Yep, lots of cloaked sites in Google's SERPs, including image search, some are there for pretty long time... this is what they should fix, including their fucking new Gmail that is still slow as fuck and almost useless... this should not be their job to dictate webmasters what kind of ads are fine and what are not for surfers... surfers that don't like popups can install popup blockers. surfers also don't like their fucking misleading adwords ads, ads in Youtube videos etc... hope this shit will be blocked too.

It's not just Google, it's a whole coalition of companies forcing these changes.

https://betterads.org

Klen 12-31-2018 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3xmedia (Post 22388858)
Yep, lots of cloaked sites in Google's SERPs, including image search, some are there for pretty long time... this is what they should fix, including their fucking new Gmail that is still slow as fuck and almost useless... this should not be their job to dictate webmasters what kind of ads are fine and what are not for surfers... surfers that don't like popups can install popup blockers. surfers also don't like their fucking misleading adwords ads, ads in Youtube videos etc... hope this shit will be blocked too.

Yes exactly, if they dont really want it, then how hard is to install adblocker or any other software dealing with it? Is surfers kids which need parent to take care of them? And speaking about ads in youtube videos, i find those more annoying then anything else, as it interrupt experience which shouldn't not be interrupted in any case.

Klen 12-31-2018 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388863)
It's not just Google, it's a whole coalition of companies forcing these changes.

https://betterads.org

Yes but it is only google what matter, as they have monopoly in search engine traffic and browsers.

AdultKing 12-31-2018 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22388869)
Yes but it is only google what matter, as they have monopoly in search engine traffic and browsers.

You're free to use Firefox or Safari, however come February Safari will follow the better ads standards. Not sure what Firefox will do.

You're also free to use Bing, oh wait, they're going to be doing it too.

I don't get why this is such an issue for people. Surfers hate popunders, they hate popups and clicking on things that don't behave as expected. Provide a surfer friendly experience, provide value to your website visitors and you'll come out ahead anyway.

Klen 12-31-2018 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388872)
You're free to use Firefox or Safari, however come February Safari will follow the better ads standards. Not sure what Firefox will do.

You're also free to use Bing, oh wait, they're going to be doing it too.

I don't get why this is such an issue for people. Surfers hate popunders, they hate popups and clicking on things that don't behave as expected. Provide a surfer friendly experience, provide value to your website visitors and you'll come out ahead anyway.

Surfers hates a lot of things, like paying for porn, yet we still expect for them to do it. I suppose we should stop charging for content then , huh ?

AdultKing 12-31-2018 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22388874)
Surfers hates a lot of things, like paying for porn, yet we still expect for them to do it. I suppose we should stop charging for content then , huh ?

Don't be ridiculous, this is about website experience. People still pay for porn.

Klen 12-31-2018 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388878)
Don't be ridiculous, this is about website experience. People still pay for porn.

And they still surf sites with popups so....

AdultKing 12-31-2018 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22388881)
And they still surf sites with popups so....

Yeah, they'll be able to with Chrome because Chrome will block all the ads on those sites :1orglaugh

Beaver1 12-31-2018 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388882)
Yeah, they'll be able to with Chrome because Chrome will block all the ads on those sites :1orglaugh

Bounce rate and average time on page are nearly the same, with or without the pop.

Klen 12-31-2018 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22388882)
Yeah, they'll be able to with Chrome because Chrome will block all the ads on those sites :1orglaugh

Chrome supposed to block all pops back then while it was version 64 already.All the sites which i know still working and doing pops. Not to mention bunch of other stuff which suppose to be "no more" but still working fine. :1orglaugh

mikeworks 12-31-2018 11:19 AM

I visited two mindgeek tubes (you**** and porn***) and they both had a popup appear.

247mg 12-31-2018 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeworks (Post 22388954)
I visited two mindgeek tubes (you**** and porn***) and they both had a popup appear.

Google don’t have guts to send them notifications what they send to us. They have pops and will keep their pops and google will give them top rating in serp. Discrimination

AdultKing 12-31-2018 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22388924)
Chrome supposed to block all pops back then while it was version 64 already.All the sites which i know still working and doing pops. Not to mention bunch of other stuff which suppose to be "no more" but still working fine. :1orglaugh

Yep that's right, which is why Google has gone to blocking all ads on sites that aren't compliant. Come February I think there's going to be a lot of webmasters crying because they didn't do what is needed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22388962)
Google don’t have guts to send them notifications what they send to us. They have pops and will keep their pops and google will give them top rating in serp. Discrimination

They will get exactly the same notifications, but let's face it, PornHub don't need Google as much as smaller sites because of a massive referral network and brand awareness.

noctropolis 01-01-2019 01:22 PM

I removed all popunders from my site and all my other ads having "google ad compliance" turned ON on ExoClick and google STILL says my ads are misleading after another check. What a shitty corporation.

247mg 01-01-2019 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noctropolis (Post 22389297)
I removed all popunders from my site and all my other ads having "google ad compliance" turned ON on ExoClick and google STILL says my ads are misleading after another check. What a shitty corporation.

Did you update the code of new google compliance add in site? Dod you give few hours before submitting site for review? Contact exoclick and send them latest video send to u by google

noctropolis 01-01-2019 01:53 PM

I have compliance turned ON since month. Lately only turned off popunders. Ads code for compliance on/off is same. The change is only on exoclick ads serving server scripts. Yes, I must contact exoclick.

247mg 01-01-2019 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noctropolis (Post 22389311)
I have compliance turned ON since month. Lately only turned off popunders. Ads code for compliance on/off is same. The change is only on exoclick ads serving server scripts. Yes, I must contact exoclick.

The review video will tell you what is wrong. Last time when we submit site for a review... it was decline bcz of popunder not related to ads from exo... google compliance ads was on. You need to check which type of exo ads you are using.... push notifications and normal banner and messenger ads are google complaince from exo.... any other ad are risky

Klen 01-01-2019 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22389028)



They will get exactly the same notifications, but let's face it, PornHub don't need Google as much as smaller sites because of a massive referral network and brand awareness.

Yeah i guess them spending 100k $ monthly on backlinks is just for fun and kicks.:1orglaugh

AdultKing 01-01-2019 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22389389)
Yeah i guess them spending 100k $ monthly on backlinks is just for fun and kicks.:1orglaugh

I didn't say they didn't need Google, I said they don't need them as much as most other sites. If they got temporarily de-indexed or pushed down in rankings because of a problem they would have no problem fixing the issues and recovering. Google has penalised big sites before.

A smaller site that is a main source of income for a webmaster wouldn't be able to survive a de-indexing or penalty as easily.

Beaver1 01-01-2019 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noctropolis (Post 22389311)
I have compliance turned ON since month. Lately only turned off popunders. Ads code for compliance on/off is same. The change is only on exoclick ads serving server scripts. Yes, I must contact exoclick.


The same, here exoclick google compliance function is just a joke, across all their ad formats.
Ad zones and sites get flaged, no mather if you use that function, or not.

Support is totally helpless and asking me for hours of programming and changing codes, to implement new class and trigger functions, into my site.

If chrome blocks sitewide ads (including revshare links) in february, the use of ad companies will be a risk that is not longer worth go.

Klen 01-02-2019 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22389481)
I didn't say they didn't need Google, I said they don't need them as much as most other sites. If they got temporarily de-indexed or pushed down in rankings because of a problem they would have no problem fixing the issues and recovering. Google has penalised big sites before.

A smaller site that is a main source of income for a webmaster wouldn't be able to survive a de-indexing or penalty as easily.

You cannot compare company with dozen of employees and solo webmasters.

AdultKing 01-02-2019 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 22389572)
You cannot compare company with dozen of employees and solo webmasters.

Now you're just trolling.

All I am saying is that Mindgeek would be less affected by a Google penalty than your average webmaster.

So it's important for webmasters to fix their Google issues before you get penalised or have all ads blocked in Chrome.

Klen 01-02-2019 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22389573)
Now you're just trolling.

All I am saying is that Mindgeek would be less affected by a Google penalty than your average webmaster.

So it's important for webmasters to fix their Google issues before you get penalised or have all ads blocked in Chrome.

Yes it is important to fix those issues by bypassing google checks :)

247mg 01-02-2019 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultKing (Post 22389573)
Now you're just trolling.

All I am saying is that Mindgeek would be less affected by a Google penalty than your average webmaster.

So it's important for webmasters to fix their Google issues before you get penalised or have all ads blocked in Chrome.

That’s why we small webmaster compare to Mindgeek crying and scared of doing changes because revenue will go down but keeping all fear one one side we have do the changes to get chrome compliant, simple is that....

Beaver1 01-02-2019 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22389599)
we have do the changes to get chrome compliant, simple is that....

We have to do nothing!
And if we started earlier, Google would not have the monopoly it has today.

Whats next no animations or color on ads?
Did they really believe i will spend 2 days, to ad my sites to their webmaster tools?

The Google boat i sinking and that can be compensated for years, only by their own exscessive ad abuse
and the exploitation, of their monopoly position.

247mg 01-02-2019 11:12 AM

To owner of WEBSITE

Thank you for submitting your site WEBSITE.com for review on Jan 2, 2019.

Your site’s experiences have been reviewed, and no abusive issues were found. If your site was previously in "Failing" status, your Chrome enforcement status may have changed


No popup
No in player ad
No Messenger
No Fake message
No Cloaking

Now how to earn money to pay server bill?

Klen 01-02-2019 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22389744)
To owner of WEBSITE

Thank you for submitting your site WEBSITE.com for review on Jan 2, 2019.

Your site’s experiences have been reviewed, and no abusive issues were found. If your site was previously in "Failing" status, your Chrome enforcement status may have changed


No popup
No in player ad
No Messenger
No Fake message
No Cloaking

Now how to earn money to pay server bill?

Do
Popup
In player ad
Messenger
Fake message
Cloaking
:1orglaugh

mikeworks 01-02-2019 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22389744)
No popup
No in player ad
No Messenger
No Fake message
No Cloaking

So there will be no in video adverts on youtube soon?

247mg 01-05-2019 03:57 AM

Finally submitted all sites for a review without any ads to avoid enforcement. Better ads mean to webmaster no earning 😔

brassmonkey 01-05-2019 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22390951)
Finally submitted all sites for a review without any ads to avoid enforcement. Better ads mean to webmaster no earning 😔

didn't they give you a list of acceptable practices ???

AdultKing 01-05-2019 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeworks (Post 22389762)
So there will be no in video adverts on youtube soon?

A video preroll ad is not an in player ad. An in player ad is like the pop ups that will comes up during a video.

247mg 01-05-2019 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 22390954)
didn't they give you a list of acceptable practices ???

Bettersads.org

babeterminal 01-05-2019 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 247mg (Post 22390951)
Finally submitted all sites for a review without any ads to avoid enforcement. Better ads mean to webmaster no earning 😔

what are you worrying about google for? you have an affiliate network[sort out some xml feeds,fhg dumps all formats etc etc......., drop them and bing

eveknows.................

when the tubes are not accessible and the torrents are gone

WE THE AFFILIATES WILL STILL BE HERE

I

REALLY

LIKE

|
|
|

mikeworks 01-06-2019 05:31 AM

Are plugrush 'adblock safe' popunders still ok to use?

I see there are settings for:
Activate on clickable content
Activate on any click
Turn off popunder

I have them all set to Activate on clickable content.

AdultKing 01-06-2019 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeworks (Post 22391573)
Are plugrush 'adblock safe' popunders still ok to use?

I see there are settings for:
Activate on clickable content
Activate on any click
Turn off popunder

I have them all set to Activate on clickable content.

refer to https://betterads.org

everything you need to know is there

noctropolis 01-06-2019 08:04 AM

I turn off ALL ads for review, get "safe" status, and turn almost all on again (besides popunders) - we will see how long it will last :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123