I can only drive a vehicle I don't own and it has to be my employer
 

So apparently I can drive, but only with an interlock device. . OR I can drive an employers vehicle for normal business activities. I can own no part of the business OR the vehicle.

(I'm not going to get the interlock, period)

SO


I am self employed

And I have business activities

The problem is, if I am self employed, I own that and the vehicle

So now what

Any bright ideas anyone?

I always had someone else blow in the machine

Why wouldn't you get the interlock? Do you plan on drinking and driving again?

Also, you cannot own any part of the company or the vehicle. It's to prevent people from doing exactly what you're trying to do. Why would you think there is a way around that? Also, what do you do for a living that requires you to drive?

you are fucked

You already skipped the brightest idea...by drinking and driving.

I doubt there is a legal way around it - You could use a friends company for example, but you would not be doing business for them in the vehicle...

Do what I did when I got my DUI - Sell the car and never drive again.....

Incorporate wife, transfer car to that corp, drive

Technically traveling in your own personal conveyence isn't driving. In fact it is your right. Since you can "drive" another company's vehicle should be proof enough of this. But hey why not be Mexican? You seem to be well versed with the courts so challenge them rather than bend over. Hiring a practicing lawyer to defend you lawfully within a legal system isn't the way to go as you've found.

I can only drive a vehicle I don't own and it has to be my employer
 

How can a vehicle employ you? I doubt you'd ever get paid :2 cents:

Probably doesnt want to pay the monthly fee. I dont know what it is now, but it used to be something like 150 a month. I think id be more worried about what my insurance premiums were going to go up to.

What is 'Interlock'?

A better question is what insurance company will take a chance with you. Most insurance policies require a background check for any employee driving a company car.

Next question, what kind of company provides cars to their entry level employees? Sounds like you are fucked.

Also "normal business activities" doesn't include any driving outside business hours. So what's the point?

A device that installs to your ignition. Before your car will start you have to blow in a breathalyzer. Any alcohol on your breath and it wont start. Also randomly makes you blow while you are driving so you can't just have someone blow in it to start it for you. On the old models people used to just hook air compressors into them, but the new ones make you hum while you blow so they know you are actually breathing into it. Lol

go to "silkroad.com" ,obtain "new identity", drive

are you sure about that? here in canada you can't drive any cars without an interlock, it doesn't matter who they belong to. you also *have* to have a period where you own a car with an interlock if you ever want to get your license back.

He's just dreaming.

The simple rule is that,
1. "You can work a job".
2. The job requires driving the company van, then fine to do so during work duties.
3. No fake jobs

It's number 3 that's fucking him up.

:1orglaugh

I'm not sure where you live but I'd counsel you to have a GF drive you, or a friend. If you have any mistakes while driving under this "plan" of yours, you will likely receive jail time.

can't anyone here help him drink and drive??

Maybe they have changed it again recently, but it used to be for a first offence you could opt out of the year with the interlock if you wanted. So you basically wouldnt be able to drive at all for 2 years. Rules always seem to keep getting tougher so maybe that is not the case anymore.

I will send you a compressed air canister with my 0.00 BAC breath inside. I accept Bitcoins and Paypal for payment.

I know a guy in Kansas who went the year or whatever it was without driving. Had his girlfriend(my daughter) take him everywhere.
At the end of the year, he went to get his DL reinstated, and the state asked for proof of his interlock. He told them he had not driven in the last year. They told he before he could be reinstated, he had to have an interlock for 12 months. His parents paid for a lawyer to try and fight it, but they ended up having to get the interlock and paying the fee for another year.

Stop posting here and focus on straightening out your life instead of feeling sorry for yourself.

You only get out of life what you put in,clearly based on the judgement against you by the court you put too much alcohol in too often. :helpme

Now there's a bright idea for you. STOP DRINKING !! :thumbsup

Sincerely,

Captain Obvious.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dude you are a complete fuck up in every regard, and a perfect reason why society needs police, courts and jails :2 cents:

"Yes your honor, I was arrested again.....but, the guys on GoFuckYourself.com had told me I could do it that way!"

Lol, he would say that too.

Wrong. Driving is a privilege not a right.

.

Here you need to install it on work vehicles too. :2 cents:

I love these daily updates on white trash dilemmas.

I think he's referring to those "freemen" that claim everyone has the right to travel. Search youtube for "right to travel traffic stop". There are some great traffic stop videos where these guys claim everything from being able to drive without insurance or license and not having to show ID, etc.

They either end up arrested or the cops walk away confused after 20 minutes of arguing.

Hilarious !

"The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

"The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

"The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

In the U.S. a motor vehicle is specifically defined as a contrivance used for commercial purposes. As defined in U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. § 31 : US Code - Section 31: Definitions (6) Motor vehicle. - The term "motor vehicle" means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle

The term "used for commercial puposes" means

"According to 18 USCS § 31, term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit"
http://definitions.uslegal.com/u/use...cial-purposes/

No it is not; and before you repeat your stupid response, having a drivers license is not a right, ergo, driving is not a right.

See above and below...


For the record, I have personally asked a police officer while on the stand if he as well as the DA were speaking a language other than English. He admitted they were. It's referred to legalese. The average person doesn't think anything about it but everyone (including jurors) except the lawyers and judges understand that more or less there are two separate languages being spoken in a court room. One of those being English the other legalese.

Now imagine if you are in court for whatever reason in some foreign country and you don't know the language. You would have to hire a local "practicing" lawyer.. Otherwise you're fucked. Welcome to Amerika.

BTW I'm awaiting your well educated "give me my social security check because my generation allowed this to happen" reply.

exactly, ridiculous not one of the other rejects got a proper solution huh

Obviously the answer is to not drink and drive. But there again what definition of drive are we speaking?

Why does there have to be a con job? Do you like being conned? Because either way you look at it there's one group of people who is conning the other when it comes to the legal system.

all this is taken away once you break the laws and your license is revoked, just like when you murder someone you lose most of your rights. Are you a 14 year old kid trying to argue with adults here or what?

Oh my bad, you are a 14 year old, carry on...

I could go much further but a license is a privledge to do something which would otherwise be considered illegal. Yes, your company needs a license otherwise it would be illegal. I think I've already proved my point with Supreme Court decisions that traveling isn't a priviledge but a natural right. "Driving" which is considered legally a commercial act is.

Because you can't grasp the fact that you've been conned your whole life shows your 14 year old intelligence level.